Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:41:24.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Philosophy of the Feminine to Clinical Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Yoshiko Kanai*
Affiliation:
Rissho University, Tokyo
*
Yoshiko Kanai, Rissho University, 13-5 Suzaki Kanazawaku, Yokohama 236-0028, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

By focusing on the concept of “clinical philosophy”, this paper develops a Narrative/Trauma approach to deal with the philosophical problematic of oppression and violence. It establishes a link to a “philosophy of the feminine” and brings it together with clinical wisdom to describe a “sphere of intimacy without violence”. The ideology of motherhood so deeply embedded in Japanese society makes unavoidable for feminist philosophy in Japan to question femininity from the standpoint of the double nature of female self as woman and mother. Confronting the motherhood that regulates core Japanese culture and mentality requires a critique of the practice of matri-archy in the intimate sphere. Historically, post-war Japanese family appears in continuity with the matriarchal nature of the imperial and military regime in pre-war Japan. To be fully effective, feminism should therefore transform itself from a gender category to a philosophy, and create a concept of feminine that would be the core notion of feminism as a philosophy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2011

References

Cixous, H, Clément, C (1975) La jeune née. Paris: UGE, 1018.Google Scholar
Felman, S (1993) What Does a Woman Want: Reading and Sexual Difference. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, H (2000)〈フェミニン〉の哲学. Tōkyō: 青土社.Google ScholarPubMed
Kanai, Y (2008a) ナラティブの熟成から、ボイスを紡ぎ、新たなコンセプトへ. In Kyoto Forum for Public Philosophy (2008).Google Scholar
Kanai, Y (2008b) 異なっていられる社会を 女性学/ジェンダー研究の視座. Tōkyō: 明石書店.Google Scholar
Kanai, Y (2009) 家族・親密圏・根拠地—親密圏の脱・暴力化と『自己領域』. In Kawamoto, T (ed.), 岩波講座 哲学12 性/愛の哲学. Tōkyō: 岩波書店.Google Scholar
Kano, A (1997) 日本のフェミニズム論争史. In Ebara, Y, Kanai, Y (eds), フェミニズムGoogle Scholar
Kyoto Forum for Public Philosophy (2008) 公共哲学・特巻 公共哲学の歩み. Tōkyō: 東京大学出版会.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, S (2008) イマジナリーな連帯を求めて. In Kyoto Forum for Public Philosophy (2008).Google Scholar
Miyaji, N (2005) トラウマとジェンダー 臨床からの声. Tōkyō: 金剛出版.Google ScholarPubMed
Miyaji, N (2007) 環状島=トラウマの地政学. Tōkyō: 金剛出版.Google ScholarPubMed
Morioka, M (1996) 現代女性運動の生命論 田中美津の場合. In Tetsuo, Y (ed.) 日本文化と宗教. Tōkyō: 国際日本文化研究センター.Google ScholarPubMed
Morisaki, K (1994) いのちを産む. Tōkyō: 弘文堂.Google ScholarPubMed
Morisaki, K (2008–) 森崎和江コレクション. Tōkyō: 藤原書店.Google ScholarPubMed
Noda, M (2004) 共感する力. Tōkyō: みすず書房.Google ScholarPubMed
Noguchi, Y (2003) ナラティブの臨床社会学. Tōkyō: 勁草書房.Google ScholarPubMed
Osawa, M (2008) アキハバラ発 〈00年代〉への問い. Tōkyō: 岩波書店.Google Scholar
Rich, A (1976) Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Saito, J (2000) 公共性. Tōkyō: 岩波書店.Google ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, M (1975) いのちの女たちへ とり乱しウーマンリブ論. Tōkyō: 田畑書店.Google ScholarPubMed
Washida, K (1999) 「聴く」ことの力 臨床哲学試論. Tōkyō: TBS-Britannica.Google ScholarPubMed