Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T00:29:38.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elements for a Theory of the Frontier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Claude Raffestin
Claude Raffestin*
Affiliation:
University of Geneva
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“Frontier” is included in the general category of “limit” (limes: a road bordering a field). But what is at the origin of limit, frontier? An authority, a power that can exercise “the social function of ritual and social significance of the line, the limit whose ritual legitimizes passage, transgression” (Bourdieu, 1982, p. 121). The limit, a traced line, sets up an order that is not only spatial but temporal, since it not only separates a “this side” from a “that side” but also a “before” and an “after”. This dual nature of the limit is at work in the myth of the founding of Rome. Any limit, any frontier, is intentional: it proceeds from a will; it is never arbitrary. Its legitimacy was originally established by a religious ritual and later, by a political procedure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 34 , Issue 134 , June 1986 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Angel, J., Les Frontières, Paris, 1938.Google Scholar
Andre, L., Louis XIV et l'Europe, Paris, Albin Michel, 1950.Google Scholar
Ardrey, R., The Territorial Imperative, New York, Atheneum, 1966.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E., Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, Vol. II, Paris, Ed. de Minuit, 1969.Google Scholar
Benvenuti, F., “Evoluzione storica del concetto di confine,” in Confini e Regioni, Boundaries and Regions, Trieste, 1973.Google Scholar
Boggs, S.W., International Boundaries, Study of Boundary Functions and Problems, New York, 1940.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., Ce que parler veut dire, Paris, Fayard, 1982.Google Scholar
Claval, P., Espace et pouvoir, Paris, P.U.F., 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Blij, H.J., Systematic Political Geography, New York, John Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
Dion, R., Les Frontières de la France, Paris, 1947.Google Scholar
Girard, R., La violence et le sacré, Paris, Grasset, 1972.Google Scholar
Guichonnet, P.; Raffestin, C., Géographie des frontières, Paris, P.U.F., 1974.Google Scholar
Guillemain, B., “De la dynamique des systèmes aux frontières linéaires”, in Confini e Regioni: Boundaries and Regions, Trieste, 1973.Google Scholar
Jones, S.B., Boundary Making: a Handbook for Statesmen, Washington, 1945.Google Scholar
Kristof, L.K.D., “The Nature of Frontiers and Boundaries,” in De Blij, H.J., Systematic Political Geography, New York, London, Sydney, 1967.Google Scholar
Laborit, H., L'homme et la ville, Paris, Flammarion, 1971.Google Scholar
Laborit, H. L'inhibition de l'action, Paris, Masson; New York, Barcelona, Milan, 1979.Google Scholar
Moles, A.; Rohmer, E., Psychologie de l'espace, Paris, Castermann, 1972.Google Scholar
Sanguin, A.L., La Géographie politique, Paris, P.U.F., 1977.Google Scholar
Turner, F.J., La Frontière dans l'histoire des Etats-Unis, Paris, 1963.Google Scholar
Von Uexküll, J., Mondes animaux et monde humain, Paris, Médiations, 1965.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Paris, Gallimard, 1961.Google Scholar