No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2024
The terms “modem” and “modernity”, like many other terms in common use and of wide extension, are extremely complex. And a theory of modernity should have no other goal initially than to settle this polysemy in the hope of arriving at a sufficiently rigid definition that the “thing” itself can become the object of a clearer consideration. But what is the path toward this greater clarity?
1 Editions de Minuit, 1962.
2 Paul Hazard, La Crise de la conscience européenne, Paris, 1961, p. 26.
3 Curiosités esthétiques, "De l'héroîsme de la vie modeme".
4 Henri Van Lier, Le Nouvel Age, Tournai, 1962, p. 70.
5 An interesting study could be made of the mechanical model employed in the "assembly" of the Comunist party by Lenin.
6 Les mots et les choses, Paris, 1966, p. 345.