Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:57:18.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Yves Hamant
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The rich text by Roberte Hamayon can be viewed from several angles. I will limit myself to one by noting that this particular case offers a very interesting illustration of the treatment of ethnic questions in Russia following the collapse of the USSR.

Type
Article Commentary
Information
Diogenes , Volume 49 , Issue 194 , June 2002 , pp. 22 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2002

References

Notes

1. According to the Russian tradition, which has been imposed on all inhabitants of the USSR, each person is referred to by their forename, their patronymic and their family name. The patronymic is used here as a further indication of ethnic origin.

2. L.L. Abaeva, B.P. Kranev, Social'no-politicheskij analiz vyborov v respublike Burjatii [Political and social analysis of the elections in the Republic of Buryatia], September 1994]: http://www.iea.ras.ru/Russian/publications/applied/69.html.

3. See, for example, V.A. Rudnev, Sovetskie prazdniki, obrjady, ritualy [Soviet festivals, rites and rituals], Leningrad, Leninizdat 1979.