Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-xrnlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:49:31.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Amazonian Drugstore: Reflections On Pharmacotherapy and Phantasy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Thomas H. Lewis*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

My office is in a medical building in suburban Washington, D.C. —in Bethesda, named for the Biblical healing pool. All of the offices of my building are occupied by medical specialists, representing the most sophisticated training in the application of the scientific method. Downstairs and of service to all of us is a pharmacy, looking for all the world like a research laboratory with its gleaming surface, meticulous cleanliness, micro-balances, records, reference books, and cash register. It is neatly stocked with modern, physiologically-defined preparations of active, predictable drugs. Among the enzymes, hormones, antibiotics, and chemo therapeutics for neoplasm, are a few newly hatched, unfledged remedies, but most are dependable and thoroughly assayed. The intently busy, white-coated, unsentimental pharmacists serve a hard-headed group of practitioners and a neighborhood of upper-class, well-educated patients. It is disconcerting, then, to see the undersurface of this sophistication, the irrational shadows beneath the science. On the front counter of the pharmacy are displayed attractive colored advertisements and pleasantly seductive inducements to self-improvement through diet cults and foods, tranquilizers, energizers, protein supplements, happiness promisers, preparations to enhance sexuality, vitamins artfully combined, and many packeted stuffs of no rational or pretended use whatsoever. “Why,” I ask the gimlet-eyed pharmacist, “do you have this large display of ‘Il Wah Genuine Chinese Ginseng, the Miraculous Herb of Life’? Doesn't it violate your university training? Your integrity as a modernist?” “Oh,” says he, “ginseng makes you feel better! You have more energy. You can do more! Lots of athletes use it, and people who work too hard and feel exhausted. It's only $3.45 a package. The prescriptions you give me once in a while yield no profit, but I sell a lot of ginseng. I use it myself!” Bemused, I walk back to my office, wondering about the easy abandonment of rationality, and pull down a box of medicinals collected the year before at an open-air pharmacy in the riverside markets of Brazil. The box gives forth deliciously rich forest smells. The packets within contain barks, roots, seeds, all of purported medical value. Other packets have amulets, charms, and protectives. The colorful labels on some of the patent medicines invoke ancient saints and healers, and promise happiness, health, prosperity and power. The essential rationale for their use in indigenous medicine was illusive to me despite many conversations with indigenous healers, and many times I have gone through the hundreds of items trying to find the key to what Brazilian and North American people fundamentally want from a pharmacy. In both cultures, where does magic stop and science begin? Do shops in both countries vend talismans in the search for the enhanced life, and fetishes against death? How much of all drug use is ritual and inchoate expectation ? How can we reduce the mystification and incrementally increase the rationality of our pharmacopeia?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Araujo, Alceu Maynard. 1961. Medicina Rustica [Premio Brasiliana] (1959). São Paulo, Companhia Editora Nacional, 395 pp., 31 figs.Google Scholar
Baker, Charles E. Jr., Publisher. 1979. Physician's Desk Reference 1979 Edition 33, Oradell, New Jersey, Medical Economics Company, 2047 pp.Google Scholar
Cascudo, Cascudo Luis da. 1962. Dicionário do Folclore Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, Instituto Nacional do Livro, Ministério da Educação e Cultura, Segunda Edição, 2 vols., 795 pp. Illus.Google Scholar
Glick, Leonard B. 1967. Magic, Science, and Religion in a St. Lucian Pharmacy (read at 66th annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C., December 3, 1967).Google Scholar
Harper, Robert D. 1959. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy: 36 Systems. Spectrum Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, Francis. 1969. The Invisibles: Voodoo Gods in Haiti. McGraw-Hill, 247 pp.Google Scholar
Leonard, Henry L., Epstein, Leon J., Bernstein, Arnold and Ransom, Donald C., 1971. Mystification and Drug Misuse: Hazards in Using Psychoactive Drugs. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 133 pp.Google Scholar
Martin, Roberto D. 1978. “Modern Psychiatry and the Macumba Ritual”, Psychiatric Annals, pp. 8289.Google Scholar
Martius, D.F.T. Von. 1844. Natureza, Doenças, Medicina e Remédios Dos Indios Brasileiros, Tradução Prefácio e Notas de Peraja da Silva. Série 5a. “Brasiliana" Vol. 154. Biblioteca Pedagógica Brasileira. 1939. Rio de Janeiro, Companhia Editora Nacional, 235 pp.Google Scholar
Matta, Alfredo Augusto da. 1913. Flora Medicinal Brasileira. Imprensa Oficial.Google Scholar
Mota, Afredo da. (no date). Vocabulário Amazonense. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Orico, Osvald. (no date). Vocabulário de Crendices Amazonicas. São Paulo.Google Scholar
Ramos, Artur. 1943. O Negro Brasileiro, in: Introdução a Anthropologia Brasileira. Vol. 1, Rio de Janeiro, CEB.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Nina. 1932. Os Africanos do Brasil, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Sa Menezes, Jayme de. 1957. Medicina Indigena (na Bahia) Livraria Progresso Editora.Google Scholar
St. Clair, David. 1972. Drum and Candle. Garden City, New York, Doubleday & Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Torrey, E.F. 1972. The Mind Game: Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists, New York, Emerson Hall, Inc., 236 pp.Google Scholar
Garfield, Tourney and Plazals, J.D., 1954. “Evil Eye in Myth and Schizophrenia”, Psychiatric Quarterly. Vol. 28, pp. 475495.Google Scholar