Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:57:08.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acting-Intuition and Pathos in Nishida and Miki: For the Invisible of the Post-Hiroshima Age, or Irradiated Bodies and Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Nobuo Kazashi*
Affiliation:
Kobe University
*
Nobuo Kazashi, Kobe University, 1-17-3 Yakushigaoka, Hiroshima, Japan 731-5154. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One of the hallmarks of Kitaro Nishida (1870-1945) and the Kyoto School formed around him is their emphatic endeavor to reconsider perennial philosophical questions from what they called the “stand of the acting-self.” In this paper we begin by bringing into relief the contemporary significance of Nishida’s pioneering notions – such as “logic of place,” “acting-intuition,” and “historical body” – by relating them to some kindred meditations by James, Merleau-Ponty, and Heidegger. Along the way, we call into question some shortcomings that we consider inherent in these philosophical perspectives – with special attention to their expression in the thought of Nishida’s disciple, Kiyoshi Miki, who sought to advance his master’s thought critically under the headings of “dialectics of logos and pathos” and “formative imagination.” Then, we discuss some issues regarding inhuman weapons – particularly the so-called DU (depleted uranium) weapons, which we regard as the “nuclear shadow” – in order to illustrate the aspects of human reality to which Nishida and Miki failed to give adequate consideration. In particular, we examine the destructive capabilities of our “technological bodies” and the reality of the often invisible “pathos of others” – especially in times of war – which ultimately is ours as well.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2011

References

Akamatsu, T (1994) 三木清—哲学的思索の軌跡. Kyoto: ミネルヴァ書房.Google ScholarPubMed
Findlay, J, Gilchrist, I (2003) Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
James, W (1912) Essays in Radical Empiricism, ed. Perry, RB. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
James, W (1909) A Pluralistic Universe. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Kazashi, N (1995) The musicality of the other: Schutz, Merleau-Ponty, and Kimura. In Crowell, SG (ed.) Prism of the Self. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 171188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazashi, N (1999) Bodily logos: James, Nishida, and Merleau-Ponty. In Olkowski, D, Morely, J (eds) Merleau-Ponty: Interiority and Exteriority, Psychic Life and the World. Albany: State University of New York Press, 121134.Google Scholar
Kazashi, N (2000) De la pluralité de lieu: James, Nishida et Sôseki. In Berque, A (ed.) Logique de lieu et dépassement de la modérnité. Bruxelles: Edition Ousia, 263286.Google Scholar
Kazashi, N (2009) The passion for philosophy in a post-Hiroshima age: Rethinking Nishida’s philosophy of history. In Bouso, R, Heisig, JW (eds) Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy: Confluences and Cross-Currents, 6: 129140. Nagoya: Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture.Google Scholar
Kazashi, N (2010) DU (Depleted Uranium) problem as the nuclear shadow: Iraq War as seen from Hiroshima. In Rinnert, C, Farouk, O, Inoue, Y (eds) Hiroshima and Peace. Hiroshima: Keisuisha, 230244.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T (2010) <主体のゆくえ> 日本近代思想史への一視角. Tokyo: 講談社.Google ScholarPubMed
Lakoff, G, Johnson, M (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mayeda, G (2006) Time, Space and Ethics in the Philosophy of Watsuji Tetsuro, Kuki Shuzo, and Martin Heidegger. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M (1964) The Primacy of Perception, ed. Edie, J. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern UP.Google Scholar
Miki, K (1940) 哲学入門. Tokyo: 岩波書店.Google Scholar
Miki, K (2001) 創造する構想力, ed. Ômine, A. Kyoto: 灯影舎.Google ScholarPubMed
Miki, K (2007) 東亜協同体論集, ed. Uchida, H. Tokyo: こぶし書房.Google ScholarPubMed
Nishida, K (1953–55) 西田幾多郎全集, 19 vols. Tokyo: 岩波書店.Google Scholar
Nishida, K (1965) 哲学論文集. Tokyo: 岩波書店.Google ScholarPubMed
Nishida, K (1970) Fundamental Problems of Philosophy: The World of Action and The Dialectical World. Translated by Dilworth, D.A. Tokyo: Sophia UP. [The original Japanese edition was published in 1930.]Google Scholar
Nishida, K (1988) 西田幾多郎哲学論集, vol. II, ed. Ueda, S. Tokyo: 岩波書店.Google Scholar
Nishida, K (1990) An Inquiry into the Good. Translated by Abe, M, Ives, C. New Haven: Yale UP. [The first English translation was made by Valdo H Viglielmo under the title of A Study of Good and published by Printing Bureau of the Japanese Government in Tokyo in 1960.]Google Scholar
Nishitani, K (1991) Nishida Kitaro: The Man and His Thought. Translated by Yamamoto, S, Heisig, JW. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Noë, A (2005) Action in Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Odin, S (1996) The Social Self in Zen and American Pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tashiro, A (2001) Discounted Casualties: The Human Cost of Depleted Uranium. Hiroshima: Chugoku Shimbun.Google Scholar
Townsend, S (2009) Miki Kiyoshi 1897–1945: Japan’s Itinerant Philosopher. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, H (2004) 三木清—個性者の構想力. Tokyo: 御茶の水書房.Google ScholarPubMed
Varela, F, Thompson, E, Rosch, E (1991) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watsuji, T (1996) Watsuji Tetsuro’s Rinrigaku. Translated by Yamamoto, S, Carter, RE. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, AN (1925) Science and the Modern World. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar