Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-27T13:53:04.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The World We Found: The Limits of Ontological TalkMark Sacks La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1989, x + 198 p.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

James O. Young
James O. Young
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 124 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Two recent discussions of this issue are, however, overlooked by Sacks. First, there is no mention of Foster, John, The Case for Idealism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982).Google Scholar A more serious omission is the lack of a discussion of Michael Dummett's suggestion that metaphysical debates are, at root, debates about the sort of meaning possessed by various classes of sentences.

2 David Hume, Treatise, Book I, Part IV, Section II.

3 Carnap, Rudolf, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Revue Internationale de philosophie, 11 (1950); 20–40.Google ScholarQuine, W. V. O., “On Carnap's Views on Ontology,” in his The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976), p. 203–11Google Scholar.