Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:04:45.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Teleology and Final Causation in Aristotle and in Contemporary Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2012

Michael Chase*
Affiliation:
CNRS-Centre Jean Pépin Villejuif (Paris)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: With a view to suggesting the possible relevance of Aristotelian thought to current notions of complexity and self-organization, studies Aristotle’s notions of teleology and final causation. After a sketch of the historical process by which such notions were finally rejected in the science of Galileo and Newton, attention is drawn to some contemporary trends in philosophy of science that argue for a return to some (modified) versions of the notion of final causation (I. Prigogine, R. Thom, S. Rosen). These arguments are illustrated by the example of Bénard cells, and the theories of Schneider, Kay, and D. Sagan.

RÉSUMÉ: En vue de suggérer l’éventuelle pertinence de la pensée aristotélicienne dans le cadre des notions actuelles de la compléxité et de l’auto-organisation, l’on étudie les notions aristotéliciennes de téléologie et de causalité finale. Après une esquisse du processus historique qui a vu le rejet définitif de telles notions à l’époque de Galilée et de Newton, l’on souligne un certain nombre de tendances dans la philosophie des sciences contemporaine où l’on fait appel à un retour d’une version modifiée de la notion de causalité finale (I. Prigogine, R. Thom, S. Rosen). Ces arguments sont illustrés par l’exemple des cellules de Bénard, ainsi que par les théories de Schneider, de Kay et de D. Sagan.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlinski, David 1995 A Tour of the Calculus. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans 1989 Die Genesis der kopernikanischen Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bouquiaux, Laurence 1994 L’harmonie et le chaos: le rationalisme leibnizien et la “nouvelle science.” Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de l’Institut supérieur de philosophie /Éditions Peeters.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario 1979 Causality and Modern Science. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Chase, Michael 2008 “The Medieval Posterity of Simplicius’ Commentary on the Categories: Thomas Aquinas and al-Fârâbî.” In Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. Newton, Lloyd A., 9–29. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Peter and Highfield, Roger 1990 The Arrow of Time. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dalleur, Philippe 2006Fécondité de la notion de «bords» vivants chez Thom.” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 104 (2): 312–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring, Ingemar 1966 Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens. Heidelberg: Carl Winter – Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Falcon, Andrea 2006 “Aristotle on Causality.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-causality)Google Scholar
Frank, Lawrence K. 1935Structure, Function and Growth.” Philosophy of Science 2 (2): 210–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furley, David F.1966Lucretius and the Stoics.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 13: 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, James 1987 Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan 1985 Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on His Seventieth Birthday. Pittsburgh: Mathesis /Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan 1987 “Aristotle’s Conception of Final Causality.” In Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, ed. Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., 204–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gribbin, John 2004 Deep Simplicity: Bringing Order to Chaos and Complexity. NewYork: Random House.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1981 Aristotle, an Encounter. Vol. 6 of A History of Greek Philosophy. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre 2006 The Veil of Isis: An Essay on the History of the Idea of Nature. Trans. Chase, Michael. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1995 “Philosophy of Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J., 140–67. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Monte Ransome 2005 Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Stuart A., 1995 At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Stuart A. 2000 Investigations. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, H. 1971 Science and Change: 1500-1700. New York/Toronto: World University Library.Google Scholar
Koch, Isabelle 2005 “Le «Dieu vivant» d’Aristote.” In La «Métaphysique» d’Aristote: perspectives contemporaines. Première rencontre aristotélicienne (Aix-en-Provence, 21-24 octobre 1999), ed. Narcy, Michel and Tordesillas, Alonso, 199–213. Paris: Vrin; Bruxelles: Ousia.Google Scholar
Krafft, Fritz 2001Naturwissenschaften. IV.F: Machina Mundi.” Vol. 15.1 of Der NeuePauly, Enzyklopädie der Antike, Rezeptions- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte, col. 826–8. Stuttgart/Weimar: Verlag J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Lambert, Dominque and Rezsöhazy, René 2004 Comment les pattes viennent au serpent. Essai sur l’étonnante plasticité du vivant. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Largeault, Jean 2006 Systèmes de la nature. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Leunissen, Mariska 2010 Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, Roger 1999 Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto R. and Varela, Francisco J. 1998 The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Rev. ed. Boston/London: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Monod, Jacques 1971 Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. London: Founts.Google Scholar
Morowitz, Harold J. 1993 Entropy and the Magic Flute. New York/London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolis, Grégoire and Prigogine, Ilya 1989 Exploring Complexity: An Introduction. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
O’Grady, R. T. and Brooks, D. R. 1988 “Teleology and Biology.” In Entropy, Information and Evolution: New Perspectives on Physical and Biological Evolution, ed. Weber, B. H., Depew, D. J., and Smith, J. D.. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, Pierre 1995 Aristote, Parties des animaux: livre I, trad. et notes par Jean-Marie Le Blond; introd. et mises à jour par P. P. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Penrose, Roger 2010 Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle 1986 La nouvelle alliance: métamorphose de la science. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle 1986 “Irreversibility and Space-Time Structure.” In Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time, ed. Griffin, D. R., 232–50. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle 2001 Entre le temps et l’éternité. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Rosen, Robert 1991 Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Robert 2000 Essays on Life Itself. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rowan Robinson, Michael 2002Was Aristotle the First Physicist?” physicsworld.com (http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/3494)Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1959 Wisdom of the West. New York: Crescent Books.Google Scholar
Schneider, Eric D. and Kay, James J. 1994Life as a Manifestation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.” Mathematical and Computer Modeling 19 (6–8): 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Eric D. and Sagan, Dorion 2005 Into the Cool: Energy Flow, Thermodynamics, and Life. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, Erwin 1992 What Is Life: The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell, with Mind and Matter, and Autobiographical Sketches. Cambridge NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Alwyn C. 2002 Neuroscience: A Mathematical Primer. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Scott, Alwyn C 2007 The Nonlinear Universe: Chaos, Emergence, Life. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Sedley, David 1991Is Aristotle’s Teleology Anthropocentric?Phronesis 36: 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David 2007 Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, T. L. 2002Darwin’s Concept of Final Cause: Neither New nor Trivial.” Biology and Philosophy 17: 323–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, Richard 1980 Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Thom, René 1977 Stabilité structurelle et morphogenèse. Paris: InterÉditions.Google Scholar
Thom, René 1980 Modèles mathématiques de la morphogenèse. Paris: Christian Bourgeois.Google Scholar
Thom, René 1990 Apologie du Logos. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Thom, René 1991a “Matière, forme et catastrophes.” In Penser avec Aristote. Études réunies sous la direction de M. A. Sinaceur, 367–98. Toulouse: Éditions Erès.Google Scholar
Thom, René 1991b “Aristote et l’avènement de la science moderne: la rupture galiléenne.” In Penser avec Aristote. Études réunies sous la direction de M. A. Sinaceur, 489–96. Toulouse: Éditions Erès.Google Scholar
Ulanowicz, Robert E. 1990Aristotelian Causalities in Ecosystem Development.” Oikos 57 (1): 42–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldrop, M. Mitchell 1992 Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Wicken, Jeffrey S. 1981Causal Explanations in Classical and Statistical Thermodynamics.” Philosophy of Science 48 (1): 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar