Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:50:18.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Schematics of Continuant Identity*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Nollaig MacKenzie
Nollaig MacKenzie
Affiliation:
Glendon College, York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A natural, and popular, way to approach the identity of a continuant under a sortal F is to suppose there to be:

(a) A synchronic F-unity relation, binding bits of a world-slice into discrete F-stages.

(b) A diachronic F-unity relation, binding series of F-stages into F's.

In a Minkowskian world, of course, the synchronic and diachronic relations must reveal themselves as simply aspects of a single unity relation for F. But since the proper time of the continuant itself is the most natural generator of space and time axes, the decomposition of the unity-relation into (a) and (b) will normally be effortless.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , Summer 1986 , pp. 245 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wiggins, David, Identity and Spatio-Temporal Continuity(Oxford: Blackwell; 1967), 76. My views have been influenced by Wiggins' work, but courtesy requires me to note that, going byGoogle ScholarSameness and Substance (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980), he would find my position repellentGoogle Scholar.

2 Findcon will nicely handle Bernard Williams' problem about cases (v) and (vi) in “The Self and the Future”, Problems of the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973)Google Scholar. To maintain clarity I leave out some detail. In the end one would want to mention such things as: (1) differences in “purity” of continuity from Tl stage to T2 stage; (2) differences in viability among T2 stages; (3) normalcy (for F-identity) of the causal routes to one or another T2 stage; (4) shifts in the way a criterion of identity is applied to broken things. I should take this opportunity to bring up to date footnote 9 of my “Can 1 Cease to Be a Person”, Dialogue 21/2 (June 1982), 241:Google Scholar replace reference to nested loops and recursion with a pointer to Findcon.