Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:21:20.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Role for Reason in Science*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Jonathan Y. Tsou
Jonathan Y. Tsou
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Notice/Étude critique
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , Summer 2003 , pp. 573 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carnap, Rudolf 1937 The Logical Syntax of Language. Translated by Smeaton, A.. London: Kegan Paul. Originally published as Logische Syntax der Sprache. Wien: Springer, 1934.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1967 The Logical Structure of the World. Translated by George, R. A.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Originally published as Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Weltkreis, 1928.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1983 “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” Reprinted (with revisions) in Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings. 2nd ed. Edited by Benacerraf, P. and Putnam, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241–57. Originally published in Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 11 (1950): 20–40.Google Scholar
Coffa, J. Alberto 1991 The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. Edited by Wessels, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creath, Richard, ed. 1990 Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Disalle, Robert 2002 “Reconsidering Kant, Friedman, Logical Positivism, and the Exact Sciences.” Philosophy of Science, 69: 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Arthur 1984 “The Natural Ontological Attitude.” In Scientific Realism. Edited by Leplin, J.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael 1983 Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and the Philosophy of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael 1992 Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael 1997 “Philosophical Naturalism.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 71: 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael 1999 Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael 2001 Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publishers.Google Scholar
Horgan, John 1996 The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twiligh t of the Scientific Age. New York: Broadway.Google Scholar
Howard, Don 1994 “Einstein, Kant, and the Origins of Logical Empiricism.” In Logic, Language, and the Structure of Scientific Theories: Proceedings of the Carnap-Reichenbach Centennial, University of Konstanz, 21–24 May 1991. Edited by Salmon, W. and Wolters, G.. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 45–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977 “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice.” In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 320–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1983 “Rationality and Theory Choice.” Journal of Philosophy, 80: 563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1993 “Afterwords.” In World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science. Edited by Horwich, P.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 311–41.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Originally published in 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, Larry 1977 Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1970 “Normal Science and Its Dangers.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Edited by Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1981 Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, Andrew, ed. 1999 Key Philosophers in Conversation: The Cogito Interviews. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard V. 1969 “Epistemology Naturalized.” In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard V. 1970 Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. 1980 “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Reprinted (with revisions) inform a Logical Point of View: Nine Logic-Philosophical Essays. 2nd rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: University of Harvard Press, pp. 20–46. Originally published in Philosophical Review, 60 (1951): 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans 1958 The Philosophy of Space and Time. Translated by Reichenbach, M. and Freund, J.. New York: Dover. Originally published as Philosophie der Raum-Zeit–Lehre. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1928.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans 1965 The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Translated by Reichenbach, M.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Originally published as Relativitatstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori. Berlin: Springer, 1920.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans 1969 Axiomatization of the Theory of Relativity. Translated by Reichenbach, M.. Berkeley, CA: University of Ca lifornia Press. Originally published as Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum–Zeit-Lehre. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1924.Google Scholar
Reisch, George A. 1991 “Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism?” Philosophy of Science, 58: 264–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Alan W. 1998 Carnap's Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan W. 2002 “Narrating the History of Reason Itself: Friedman, Kuhn, and a Constitutive A Priori for the Twenty-First Century.” Perspectives on Science, 10: 253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilpp, Paul A., ed. 1963 The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 11. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz 1979 “Critical or Empiricist Interpretation of Modern Physics?” Translated by Heath, P.. Reprinted in Moritz Schlick: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Edited by Mulder, H. L. and van de Velde-Schlick, B. F. B.. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 322–34. Originally published as “Kritizistische oder empiristische Deutung der neuen Physik?” Kant-Studien, 26 (1921): 96–111.Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz 1985 General Theory of Knowledge. Translated by Blumberg, A.. La Salle, IL: Open Court. Originally published as Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre. Berlin: Naturwissenschaftliche, 1918.Google Scholar
Stein, Howard 1989 “Yes, but …: Some Skeptical Remarks on Realism and AntiRealism.” Dialectica, 43: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar