Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:27:40.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Lawrence Resnick

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

J. F. M. Hunter
J. F. M. Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is quite difficult to respond briefly and effectively to such a devastating charge as that the only merit your book has is that it is honest. My strategy will be, by showing that a few of Resnick's criticisms are ill-taken, to generate the presumption that the same could be said of a lot more of them. I will first discuss some minor points, and then two larger issues.

Type
Critical Notices/Etudes Critiques
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Spring 1988 , pp. 157 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)