Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:12:43.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Referring to the Qualitative Dimension of Consciousness: Iconicity instead of Indexicality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2013

MARC CHAMPAGNE
MARC CHAMPAGNE*
Affiliation:
York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper suggests that reference to phenomenal qualities is best understood as involving iconicity, that is, a passage from sign-vehicle to object that exploits a similarity between the two. This contrasts with a version of the ‘phenomenal concept strategy’ that takes indexicality to be central. However, since it is doubtful that phenomenal qualities are capable of causally interacting with anything, indexical reference seems inappropriate. While a theorist like David Papineau is independently coming to something akin to iconicity, I think some of the awkwardness that plagues his account would be remedied by transitioning to a more inclusive philosophy of signs.

Cet article suggère que la référence aux qualités phénoménales devrait être conçue comme mettant à l’œuvre l’iconicité, c’est-à-dire un passage de véhicule à objet qui exploite une similarité entre les deux. Ceci s’oppose à une version de la «stratégie des concepts phénoménaux» selon laquelle l’indexicalité jouerait un rôle central. Or, étant donné qu’il est peu probable que les qualités phénoménales soient capables d’interagir avec quoi que ce soit, la référence indiciaire semble ne pas convenir. Quoi qu’un théoricien tel David Papineau parvienne indépendamment à quelque chose de semblable à l’iconicité, je crois que certains aspects problématiques qui accompagnent sa théorie se dissiperaient si l’on adoptait une philosophie du signe plus englobante.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 135 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bains, Paul 2006 The Primacy of Semiosis: An Ontology of Relations. Toronto, London, and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balog, Katalin 2009“Phenomenal Concepts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Edited by McLaughlin, Brian P., Beckermann, Ansgar, and Walter, Sven. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 292–312.Google Scholar
Beuchot, Mauricio, and Deely, John N. 1995“Common Sources for the Semiotic of Charles Peirce and John Poinsot.” The Review of Metaphysics, 48, 3: 539–566.Google Scholar
Bigelow, John, and Pargetter, Robert 2004“Acquaintance with Qualia.” In There’s Something About Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument. Edited by Ludlow, Peter, Nagasawa, Yujin, and Stoljar, Daniel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 179–195.Google Scholar
Bigelow, John, and Pargetter, Robert 2006“Re-acquaintance with Qualia.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 84, 3: 353–378.Google Scholar
Block, Ned 1990“Inverted Earth.” In Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 4: Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind. Edited by Tomberlin, James E.. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, pp. 53–79.Google Scholar
Block, Ned 1995“On a Confusion About a Function of Consciousness.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 2: 227–287.Google Scholar
Blome-Tillmann, Michael 2008“The Indexicality of ‘Knowledge.’” Philosophical Studies, 138, 1: 29–53.Google Scholar
Boler, John F.1963 Charles Peirce and Scholastic Realism: A Study of Peirce’s Relation to John Duns Scotus. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, James 2012“Philosophy and Trinity.” Symposium, 16, 1: 155–178.Google Scholar
Burks, Arthur W.1949“Icon, Index, and Symbol.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 9, 4: 673–689.Google Scholar
Carey, Susan 2009 The Origin of Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Peter 2000 Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J.1995“Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 3: 200–219.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J.1996 The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J.2003“The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief.” In Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. Edited by Smith, Quentin and Jokic, Aleksandar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 220–272.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J.2004“Imagination, Indexicality, and Intentions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 68, 1: 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, David J.2007“Phenomenal Concepts and the Explanatory Gap.” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Edited by Alter, Torin and Walter, Sven. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–194.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J.2010 The Character of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champagne, Marc 2009a“Explaining the Qualitative Dimension of Consciousness: Prescission Instead of Reification.” Dialogue, 48, 1: 145–183.Google Scholar
Champagne, Marc 2009b“A Note on M. Barbieri’s ‘Scientific Biosemiotics.’” The American Journal of Semiotics, 25, 1–2: 155–161.Google Scholar
Champagne, Marc 2009c“Some Semiotic Constraints on Metarepresentational Accounts of Consciousness.” In Semiotics 2008: Specialization, Semiosis, Semiotics. Edited by Deely, John N. and Sbrocchi, Leonard G.. New York, Ottawa, and Toronto: Legas Press, pp. 557–564.Google Scholar
Champagne, Marc 2012“Russell and the Newman Problem Revisited.” Analysis and Metaphysics, 11: 65–74.Google Scholar
Champagne, Marc Forthcoming “Just Do It: Schopenhauer and Peirce on the Immediacy of Agency.” Symposium.Google Scholar
Chemero, Anthony 2006“Information and Direct Perception: A New Approach.” In Advanced Issues on Cognitive Science and Semiotics. Edited by Farias, Priscila and Queiroz, João. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, pp. 59–72.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul M.1992 A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul M.2011“Consciousness and the Introspection of ‘Qualitative Simples.’” Eidos, 15: 12–47.Google Scholar
Cobley, Paul, ed.2010 The Routledge Companion to Semiotics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael A., and Dennett, Daniel C. 2011“Consciousness Cannot be Separated from Function.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 8: 358–364.Google Scholar
Colapietro, Vincent M.1989 Peirce’s Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Crane, Tim 2005“Papineau on Phenomenal Concepts.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 71, 1: 155–162.Google Scholar
Crane, Tim 2009“Is Perception a Propositional Attitude?” The Philosophical Quarterly, 59, 236: 452–469.Google Scholar
Daddesio, Thomas C.1995 On Minds and Symbols: The Relevance of Cognitive Science for Semiotics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence W.1997 The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence W.2011 Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Deely, John N.1990 Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Deely, John N.1994“How does Semiosis Effect Renvoi?” The American Journal of Semiotics, 11, 1–2: 11–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deely, John N.2001 Four Ages of Understanding. Toronto, London, and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Deely, John N.2002 What Distinguishes Human Understanding? South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Deely, John N.2003“The Word ‘Semiotics’: Formation and Origins.” Semiotica, 146, 1–4: 1–49.Google Scholar
Delaney, Cornelius F.1979“Peirce’s Account of Mental Activity.” Synthese, 41, 1: 25–36.Google Scholar
Deledalle, Gérard 2000 Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy of Signs: Essays in Comparative Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C.1991 Consciousness Explained. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C.1995“The Unimagined Preposterousness of Zombies.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 4: 322–326.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 1976 A Theory of Semiotics. Translated by David Osmond-Smith. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 1988“On Truth: A Fiction.” In Meaning and Mental Representations. Edited by Eco, Umberto, Santambrogio, Marco, and Violi, Patrizia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 1990 The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 2000 Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition. Translated by McEwen, Alastair. New York, San Diego, and London: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth 2002 The Varieties of Reference. Edited by McDowell, John H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Feibleman, James K.1946 An Introduction to Peirce’s Philosophy Interpreted as a System. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Fetzer, James H.2003“Consciousness and Cognition: Semiotic Conceptions of Bodies and Minds.” In Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. Edited by Smith, Quentin and Jokic, Aleksandar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 298–322.Google Scholar
Fisch, Max H.1983“Just How General is Peirce’s General Theory of Signs?” The American Journal of Semiotics, 2, 1–2: 55–60.Google Scholar
Fisch, Max H.1986 Peirce, Semeiotic, and Pragmatism. Edited by Lane Ketner, Kenneth and Kloesel, Christian J. W.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun 2006 How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson 1976 Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Second edition. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Goudge, Thomas A.1935“The View of Charles Peirce on the Given of Experience.” The Journal of Philosophy, 32, 20: 533–544.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1990“The Intrinsic Quality of Experience.” In Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 4: Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind. Edited by Tomberlin, James E.. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar
Harnad, Stevan 2002“Symbol Grounding and the Origin of Language.” In Computationalism: New Directions. Edited by Scheutz, Matthias. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 143–158.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, John 2002“Advice for Physicalists.” Philosophical Studies, 109, 1: 17–52.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher S., and McLaughlin, Brian P. 1999“There are Fewer Things in Reality than are Dreamt of in Chalmer’s Philosophy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59, 2: 445–454.Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2007“Peirce on Icons and Cognition.” In Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Architectures for Smart Applications. Edited by Priss, Uta, Polovina, Simon, and Hill, Richard. Berlin: Springer, pp. 59–68.Google Scholar
Houser, Nathan 2005“The Scent of Truth.” Semiotica, 153, 1–4: 455–466.Google Scholar
Houser, Nathan 2010“Peirce, Phenomenology and Semiotics.” In The Routledge Companion to Semiotics. Edited by Cobley, Paul. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank 1982“Epiphenomenal Qualia.” The Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 127: 127–136.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank 1986“What Mary Didn’t Know.” The Journal of Philosophy, 83, 5: 291–295.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank 2004a“Postscript on Qualia.” In There’s Something About Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument. Edited by Ludlow, Peter, Nagasawa, Yujin, and Stoljar, Daniel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 417–420.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank 2004b“Mind and Illusion.” In There’s Something About Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument. Edited by Ludlow, Peter, Nagasawa, Yujin, and Stoljar, Daniel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 421–442.Google Scholar
Jappy, Anthony 1985“‘Beauty’: Sign-Systems that Work.” Kodicas/Code: Ars Semeiotica, 8, 1–2: 111–120.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David 1989 Themes From Kaplan. Edited by Almog, Joseph, Perry, John, and Wettstein, Howard K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kilpinen, Erkki 2008“Memes Versus Signs: On the Use of Meaning Concepts about Nature and Culture.” Semiotica, 171, 1–4: 215–237.Google Scholar
Kim, Hanseung 2010“Two Notions of Indexicality.” Semiotica, 180, 1–4: 47–67.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy 2010“Transparency and Representationalist Theories of Consciousness.” Philosophy Compass, 5, 10: 902–913.Google Scholar
Kirk, Robert 1994 Raw Feeling: A Philosophical Account of the Essence of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, Robert 2005 Zombies and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleisner, Karel, and Stella, Marco 2009“Monsters We Met, Monsters We Made: On the Parallel Emergence of Phenotypic Similarity under Domestication.” Sign Systems Studies, 37, 3–4: 454–476.Google Scholar
Kull, Kalevi 2009“Vegetative, Animal, and Cultural Semiosis: The Semiotic Threshold Zones.” Cognitive Semiotics, 4: 8–27.Google Scholar
Lachs, John, and Talisse, Robert, eds.2008 American Philosophy: An Encyclopedia. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2008“The Problem of the Essential Icon.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 45, 3: 207–232.Google Scholar
Levin, Janet 2007“What is a Phenomenal Concept?” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Edited by Alter, Torin and Walter, Sven. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–110.Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph 1983“Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap.” Pacific Philosophical Quaterly, 64: 354–361.Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph 2001 Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph 2007“Phenomenal Concepts and the Materialist Constraint.” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Edited by Alter, Torin and Walter, Sven. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–166.Google Scholar
Livingston, Paul M.2004 Philosophical History and the Problem of Consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loar, Brian 1990“Phenomenal States.” In Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 4: Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind. Edited by Tomberlin, James E.. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, pp. 81–108.Google Scholar
Loar, Brian 1997“Phenomenal States.” In The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. Edited by Block, Ned, Flanagan, Owen, and Güzeldere, Güven. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 597–616.Google Scholar
Loar, Brian 1999“Should the Explanatory Gap Perplex Us?” In Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, vol. 2. Edited by Rockmore, Tom. Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center, pp. 99–104.Google Scholar
Maran, Timo 2003“Mimesis as a Phenomenon of Semiotic Communication.” Sign Systems Studies, 31, 1: 191–215.Google Scholar
Margolis, Eric, and Laurence, Stephen 1999“Concepts and Cognitive Science.” In Concepts: Core Readings. Edited by Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–81.Google Scholar
Masrour, Farid 2011“Is Perceptual Phenomenology Thin?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 83, 2: 366–397.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1968 The Visible and the Invisible. Edited by Lefort, Claude. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett 1984 Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. With an introduction by Dennett, Daniel C.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles W.1971 Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moyer, Robert S., and Landauer, Thomas K. 1967“Time Required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality.” Nature, 215, 109: 1519–1520.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1974“What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” Philosophical Review, 83, 4: 435–450.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1986 The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nida-Rümelin, Martine 2008“Phenomenal Character and the Transparency of Experience.” In The Case for Qualia. Edited by Wright, Edmond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 309–324.Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried 1995 Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried 2003“Crisis of Representation?” Semiotica, 143, 1–4: 9–15.Google Scholar
Nubiola, Jaime 1996“Scholarship on the Relations Between Ludwig Wittgenstein and Charles S. Peirce.” In Studies on the History of Logic. Edited by Angelelli, Ignacio and Cerezo, Maria. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 281–294.Google Scholar
O’Dea, John 2002“The Indexical Nature of Sensory Concepts.” Philosophical Papers, 31, 2: 169–181.Google Scholar
O’Dea, John 2008“Transparency and the Unity of Experience.” In The Case for Qualia. Edited by Wright, Edmond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 299–308.Google Scholar
Papineau, David 2002 Thinking about Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, David 2007“Phenomenal and Perceptual Concepts.” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Edited by Alter, Torin and Walter, Sven. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–144.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1931–58 The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Edited by Hartshorne, Charles, Weiss, Paul, and Burks, Arthur W.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1992 The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 1. Edited by Houser, Nathan and Kloesel, Christian. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1998 The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2. Edited by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, John 1979“The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” Noûs, 13, 1: 3–21.Google Scholar
Perry, John 1997“Indexicals and Demonstratives.” In Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Edited by Hale, Robert and Wright, Crispin. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 586–612.Google Scholar
Perry, John 2001 Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pitt, David 2004“The Phenomenology of Cognition or ‘What Is It like to Think That P?’” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69, 1: 1–36.Google Scholar
Potrč, Matjaž 2008“The World of Qualia.” In The Case for Qualia. Edited by Wright, Edmond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–124.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J.2002 Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J.2007“Mental Pointing: Phenomenal Knowledge without Concepts.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 9–10: 184–211.Google Scholar
Ransdell, Joseph M.1979“The Epistemic Function of Iconicity in Perception.” In Studies in Peirce’s Semiotic. Edited by Laine Ketner, Kenneth and Ransdell, Joseph M.. Lubbock: Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism, pp. 51–66.Google Scholar
Ransdell, Joseph M.2003“Iconicity Revisited.” Recherches sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry, 23, 1–3: 221–240.Google Scholar
Robinson, Howard 2004“Dennett on the Knowledge Argument.” In There’s Something About Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument. Edited by Ludlow, Peter, Nagasawa, Yujin, and Stoljar, Daniel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 69–73.Google Scholar
Robinson, Howard 2008“Why Frank Should Not Have Jilted Mary.” In The Case for Qualia. Edited by Wright, Edmond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 223–245.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, David M.2010“How to Think About Mental Qualities.” Philosophical Issues, 20: 368–393.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1910–11“Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11: 108–128.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand [1912] 1997 The Problems of Philosophy. With an introduction by John Perry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand [1918] 1985 The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Edited by Pears, David F.. Chicago and LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand [1940] 1997 An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. With an introduction by Thomas Baldwin. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Savan, David 1987 An Introduction to C. S. Peirce’s Full System of Semeiotic. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.Google Scholar
Schroer, Robert 2010“Where’s the Beef? Phenomenal Concepts as both Demonstrative and Substantial.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 88, 3: 505–522.Google Scholar
Seager, William E.1999 Theories of Consciousness. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seager, William E.2006“The ‘Intrinsic Nature’ Argument for Panpsychism.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13, 10–11: 129–145.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.1980“Minds, Brains, and Programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 3: 417–424.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.1983 Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A.1976“Iconicity.” Modern Language Notes, 91, 6: 1427–1456.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A.1990“Indexicality.” The American Journal of Semiotics, 7, 4: 7–28.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A.2003“Nonverbal Communication.” In Classic Readings in Semiotics. Edited by Perron, Paul and Danesi, Marcel. New York, Ottawa, and Toronto: Legas Press, pp. 173–182.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Lawrence 2011 Embodied Cognition. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shin, Sun-Joo 2002 The Iconic Logic of Peirce’s Graphs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Short, Thomas L.2006“Response to Carl Hausman.” Recherches sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry, 26, 2–3: 157–176.Google Scholar
Siegel, Susanna 2011 The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smithies, Declan 2011“What is the Role of Consciousness in Demonstrative Thought?” The Journal of Philosophy, 108, 1: 5–34.Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran 2010“From Mimicry to Mime by Way of Mimesis: Reflections on a General Theory of Iconicity.” Sign Systems Studies, 38, 1–4: 18–66.Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik 1999“How to Learn More: An Apology for a Strong Concept of Iconicity.” In Iconicity: A Fundamental Problem in Semiotics. Edited by Degn Johansson, Troels, Skov, Martin, and Brogaard, Berit. Aarhus, DE: Nordic Summer University Press, pp. 21–58.Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik 2007 Diagrammatology: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Stoljar, Daniel 2005“Physicalism and Phenomenal Concepts.” Mind and Language, 20, 5: 469–494.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael 2000 Consciousness, Color, and Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael 2002“Representationalism and the Transparency of Experience.” Noûs, 36, 1: 137–151.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Julius R.1965 Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three Essays in the History of Thought. Madison and Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Josh 2011“Abusing the Notion of What-it’s-likeness: A Response to Block.” Analysis, 71, 3: 438–443.Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, Lawrence 1986 Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
West, Donna E.2012“The Semiosis of Indexical Use: From Degenerate to Genuine.” The American Journal of Semiotics, 28, 3–4: 301–324.Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas 1983“Why Semantic Ascent Fails.” Metaphilosophy, 14, 3–4: 276–290.Google Scholar
Wright, Edmond 2008“Why Transparency is Unethical.” In The Case for Qualia. Edited by Wright, Edmond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 341–366.Google Scholar
Yablo, Stephen 1993“Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 1: 1–42.Google Scholar