Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:55:29.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Qu'est-ce qu'une experience «aisthétique» selon Platon?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Franck Fischer
Franck Fischer
Affiliation:
Montpellier, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I study the extension which, according to Plato, the activity of aisthesis should receive. After a survey of the subject, I argue first that, if human aisthesis is antepredicative, it is nevertheless apparent in doxic judgement. Next, I study what distinguishing objects means for aisthesis, arguing that such a distinction involves the mysterious presence of those “common” somethings mentioned in the Theaetetus. I proceed to make the point that we are unable, in the light of the texts, to determine whether aisthesis can name its objects. Finally, I suggest translating “aesthetic experience” as “perceptual experience.”

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , Winter 2003 , pp. 27 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Anderson, R. 1987 «The Theory of Perception in Plato's Theaetetus», dans Plato, Time, and Education. Essays in Honor of Robert S. Brumbaugh, New York, State University of New York Press, p. 61–81.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1994 Introduction à la République de Platon, traduction par B. Han, Paris, PUF, lre éd. 1991.Google Scholar
Bedu-Addo, J. T. 1976 «A Theory of Mental Development. Plato's Republic V-VII», Platon, vol. 28, p. 288–301.Google Scholar
Bedu-Addo, J. T. 1985 «Plato on the Object of Knowledge. Theaetetus 185c ff.», dans Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on His Seventieth Birthday, Bristol, Classical Press, p. 301–311.Google Scholar
Bondeson, W. 1969 «Perception, True Opinion and Knowledge in Plato's Theaetetus», Phronesis, vol. 14, p. 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 1998 Introduction au Théétète de Platon, traduction par M. Narcy, Paris, PUF, lre ed. 1990.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1970 «Plato on Sense-Perception and Knowledge (Theaetetus 184–186)», Phronesis, vol. 15, p. 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1935 Plato's Theory of Knowledge, Londres, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Des Places, E. 1961 «La langue philosophique de Platon. Le vocabulaire de l'être», Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres, p. 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixsaut, M. 1985 Le naturel philosophe. Essaisur les dialogues de Platon, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Fouillée, A. 1869 La philosophie de Platon, tome 2, Paris, Baillière.Google Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R. 1936 A Study in Plato, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Joubaud, C. 1991 Le corps humain dans la philosophie platonicienne, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1981 «Some Philosophical Uses of “To Be” in Plato», Phronesis, vol. 26, p. 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modrak, D. K. 1981 «Perception and Judgment in the Theaetetus», Phronesis, vol. 26, p. 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nédoncelle, M. 1970 «Les données auditives et le problème du langage dans l'allégorie de la caverne», Revue des sciences religieuses, vol. 44, p. 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robin, L. 1935 Platon, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Silverman, A. J. 1990 «Plato on Perception and “Commons”», Classical Quarterly, vol. 40, p. 148–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulez, A. 1991 La grammaire philosophique de Platon, Paris, PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar