Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:06:14.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Justification, Inclusion, and Discursive Equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2017

THOMAS M. BESCH
THOMAS M. BESCH*
Affiliation:
Wuhan University
*
*<[email protected]>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper challenges the view that public justification sits well with emancipatory and egalitarian intuitions. I engage political liberalism’s view of public justification. A standard objection to this view is that public justification should be more inclusive in scope. This is both plausible and problematic in emancipatory and egalitarian terms. If inclusive public justification allocates discursive standing that has much discursive purchase, as seems desirable in emancipatory terms, it is unable to allocate equal discursive standing within relevant scopes. And, if it must allocate equal discursive standing, discursive equality should be construed in terms that allow for unequal discursive purchase.

Cet article remet en question les supposés rapports entre justification publique et toute intuition émancipatrice et égalitaire. Je m’y confronte à l’idée de justification publique selon le libéralisme politique. On lui objecte habituellement que la justification publique devrait être plus inclusive. Ceci est plausible autant que problématique en termes d’émancipation et d’égalité. Si une justification publique inclusive rend possible une posture ayant un fort poids discursif («discursive purchase»), tel qu’on le voudrait du point de vue de l’émancipation, elle ne peut étendre cette posture à tous les domaines pertinents. De plus, si la justification inclusive doit offrir des postures discursives équivalentes, cette égalité discursive devrait être conçue en des termes qui permettent des poids discursifs inégaux.

Keywords

public justificationreciprocityrespectequalitypolitical liberalism
Type
Original Article/Article original
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 591 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arneson, Richard 2004 “Democracy is Not Intrinsically Just.” In Justice and Democracy, eds. Dowding, K., Goodin, R.E., Pateman, C., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besch, Thomas M. 1998 Über John Rawls’s politischen Liberalismus. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Besch, Thomas M. 2004 On Practical Constructivism and Reasonableness. PhD diss., University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Besch, Thomas M. 2012 “Political Liberalism, the Internal Conception, and the Problem of Public Dogma.” Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series) 2 (1): 153–177.Google Scholar
Besch, Thomas M. 2013 “On Political Legitimacy, Reasonableness, and Perfectionism.” Public Reason 5 (1): 58–74.Google Scholar
Besch, Thomas M. 2014 “On Discursive Respect.” Social Theory and Practice 40 (2): 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besch, Thomas M. 2017a “On justification, idealization, and discursive respect.” Manuscript. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/33343942/On_justification_idealization_and_discursive_purchase.Google Scholar
Besch, Thomas M. 2017b “Political liberalism and public justification: the deep view.” Manuscript. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/25694168/Political_liberalism_and_public_justification_the_deep_view.Google Scholar
Brower, Bruce W. 1994 “The Limits of Public Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 91 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Paul F. 1994 “Secular Fundamentalism” Columbia Law Review 94 (6): 1814–1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, David 2015 “Against Public Reason.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Vol.1, eds. Sobel, D., Vallentyne, P., Wall, S., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 112–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, David 2008 Democratic Authority. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer 2010 “The Justification of Human Rights and the Basic Right to Justification: A Reflexive Approach.” Ethics 120 (4): 711–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, Rainer 2011 “The Ground of Critique: On the Concept of Human Dignity in Social Orders of Justification.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (9): 965–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, Rainer 2012 The Right to Justification. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer 2015a “Noumenal Power.” Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, Rainer 2015b “A critical theory of politics: Grounds, method and aims. Reply to Simone Chambers, Stephen White and Lea Ypi.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (3): 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda 2007 Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, Gerald 1996 Justificatory Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean 1989 “Should Political Philosophy Be Done Without Metaphysics?” Ethics 99 (4): 791–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Jean 1992 “The Moral Commitments of Liberalism.” In The Idea of Democracy, eds. Copp, D., Hampton, J., Roemer, J.R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 292–313.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles 1990 “Political Liberalism.” Political Theory 18 (3): 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles 1996 The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles 2008 The Autonomy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles 2015 “Political Liberalism. Its Motivation and Goals.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Vol. 1, eds. Sobel, D., Vallentyne, P., Wall, S., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63–87.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen 1991 Liberal Virtues. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1991 Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1988 “Ethical Reasoning and Ideological Pluralism.” Ethics 98 (4): 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1996 Toward Justice and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2000 Bounds of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 1995a “Public Practical Reasoning: An Archeology.” Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (1): 43–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 1995b “Public Practical Reason: Political Practice.” In Theory and Practice, eds. Shapiro, I., DeCew, J.W., New York: New York University Press, 345–385.Google Scholar
Quong, Jonathan Quong 2011 Liberalism without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1980 “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 7 (9): 515–577.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 2001 Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Edited by Kelly, Erin. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 2005 Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ronzoni, Miriam 2010 “Constructivism and Practical Reason: On Intersubjectivity, Abstraction, and Judgment.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1): 74–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2015 “Against Equal Respect and Concern, Equal Rights, and Egalitarian Impartiality.” In Do All Persons Have Equal Moral Worth?, ed. Steinhoff, U., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142–172.Google Scholar
Vallier, Kevin 2011 “Against Public Reason Liberalism’s Accessibility Requirement.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3): 366–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallier, Kevin 2015a “Public justification versus public deliberation: the case for divorce.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2): 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallier, Kevin 2015b “In Defence of Intelligible Reasons in Public Justification.” Philosophical Quarterly 66 (264): 596–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Steven 2016 “The Pure Theory of Public Justification.” Social Philosophy and Policy 32 (2): 204–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar