Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:22:44.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proving Realism Transcendentally: Replies to Rolf George and William Harper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Kenneth R. Westphal
Kenneth R. Westphal
Affiliation:
University of Kent, Canterbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium/Tribune du livre
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , Fall 2007 , pp. 737 - 750
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burge, Tyler 1992 “Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1950–1990.” The Philosophical Review, 101, 1: 3–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 2003 The Logical Structure of the World. Translated by George, R. A.. LaSalle, IL: Open Court. Originally published as Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Welkreis, 1928.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth 1975 “Identity and Predication.” Journal of Philosophy, 72, 13: 343–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael 1992 Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
George, Rolf 1981 “Kant's Sensationism.” Synthese, 47, 2: 229–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Rolf 2007 “Kantian Constructions: On Westphal's Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism.” Dialogue, 46, 4: 717–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, William 1984 “Kant's Empirical Realism and the Distinction between Subjective and Objective Succession.” In Kant's Empirical Realism and the Distinction between Subjective and Objective Succession. Edited by Meerbote, R. and Harper, W.. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 108–37.Google Scholar
George, Rolf 1991 “Newton's Classic Deductions from Phenomena.” PSA 1990, 2: 183–96.Google Scholar
George, Rolf 1997 “Isaac Newton on Empirical Success and Scientific Method.” In Isaac Newton on Empirical Success and Scientific Method. Edited by Earman, L. and Norton, J. D.. Pittsburgh, PA: The University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 55–86.Google Scholar
George, Rolf 1998 “Measurement and Approximation: Newton's Inferences from Phenomena versus Glymour's Bootstrap Confirmation.” In Measurement and Approximation: Newton's Inferences from Phenomena versus Glymour's Bootstrap Confirmation. Edited by Weingartner, G., Schurz, G., and Dorn, G.. Vienna: Hölder-Picher-Tempsky, pp. 265–87.Google Scholar
George, Rolf 1999 “The First Six Propositions in Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation.” The St. John's Review, 45, 2: 74–93.Google Scholar
George, Rolf 2002 “Howard Stein on Isaac Newton: Beyond Hypotheses.” In Howard Stein on Isaac Newton: Beyond Hypotheses. Edited by Malament, D. B.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 71–112.Google Scholar
George, Rolf 2007 “Comments on Westphal.” Dialogue, 46, 4: 729–36.Google Scholar
Forthcoming Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence for Universal Gravity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1902- Kants Gesammelte Schriften. 29 vols. Könniglich Preussische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: G. Reimer (now De Gruyter). Citations are to Critique of Pure Reason: “A” for the 1781 edition; “B” for the 1787 edition; “KdU” for Kritik der Urteilskraft (Ak 6).Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice 1998 Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SirNewton, Isaac 1999 Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by Cohen, I. B. and Whittman, A.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sextus, Empiricus 1933 Outlines of Pyrrhonism (Pyrrhonian Hypotyposes). Works, Vol. 1. Translated by Bury, R. G.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Cited here as PH.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry 1999 “The Goal of Transcendental Arguments.” In The Goal of Transcendental Arguments. Edited by Stern, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1989 Hegel's Epistemological Realism. Philosophical Studies Series, Vol. 43. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1995 “Kant's Dynamic Constructions.” Journal of Philosophical Research, 20: 381–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2004a Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2004b “Must the Transcendental Conditions for the Possibility of Experience Be Ideal?” In Eredità Kantiane (1804–2004): questioni emergenti eproblemi irrisolti. Edited by Ferrini, C.. Napoli: Bibliopolis, pp. 107–26.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2005 “Kant, Wittgenstein, and Transcendental Chaos.” Philosophical Investigations, 28, 4: 303–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007 “Consciousness and Its Transcendental Conditions: Kant's Anti-Cartesian Revolt.” In Consciousness and Its Transcendental Conditions: Kant's Anti-Cartesian Revolt. Edited by Heinämaa, S., Lähteenmäki, V., and Remes, P.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 223–43.Google Scholar