Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:28:27.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postscript, June 1985

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

André Gombay
André Gombay
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Editor has very kindly offered me a last word; and I avail myself of the offer not so much to defend, improve or retract what I wrote a year ago as to acquaint the readers of Dialogue with a legal development that has occurred since then. That is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the so-called Perka case.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , Winter 1985 , pp. 613 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Perka el al. v. The Queen (1984), 14 C.C.C. (3rd), 387–421.