Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:56:48.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plausible Reasoning. By Nicholas Rescher. Assen/Amsterdam: Van Gorcum. 1976. Pp. 124.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Douglas N. Walton
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comptes Rendus—Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hamblin, C. L., Fallacies, London: Methuen, 1970.Google Scholar

2 See the review of Hamblin's Fallacies by Englebretsen, George, Dialogue, 12, 1973. pp. 151–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Morgan, Augustus De, Formal Logic, London: Taylor and Walton, 1847, pp. 281–85.Google Scholar

4 See also the discussion in Woods, John and Walton, Douglas, ‘Ad Verecundiam’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 7, 1974, pp. 135–53.Google Scholar

5 In this he diverges from Polya, and other writers on plausibility.

6 See Woods and Walton, ‘Ad Verecundiam,’ for an analysis of the structure of appeals to expertise that takes factors of “the domain of expertise” into account.

7 An index would have helped.

8 Whately, Richard, Elements of Logic, New York: William Jackson, 1836Google Scholar. See also Richard Whately, Elements of Rhetoric, 1828, photo-offset reprint edited by Douglas Ehninger. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1963.