Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:42:02.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Proposed Exhaustion of Truth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

John Collins
Affiliation:
London, U.K.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, W. 1996 A Realist Conception of Truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. 1936 Language, Truth, and Logic. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. 1990The Status of Content.” Philosophical Review, 99: 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. 1994 Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1975 Reflections on Language. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000 New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. 1996The Rediscovery of Light.” Journal of Philosophy, 93: 211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. 2001Truth Conditions without Interpretation.” Sorites, 13: 5272Google Scholar
Collins, J. 2002Truth or Meaning? A Question of Priority.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, M. 1994 Correspondence and Disquotation: An Essay on the Nature of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984 Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1990The Structure and Content of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy, 87: 279328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1996The Folly of Trying to Define Truth.” Journal of Philosophy, 94: 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, M. 1984 Realism and Truth. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, J. 1988Tarski on Truth and Logical Consequence.” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 53: 5179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, H. 1986 “The Deflationary Conception of Truth.” In Fact, Science, and Morality. Edited by MacDonald, G. and Wright, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55117.Google Scholar
Field, H. 1994Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content.” Mind, 103: 249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, H. 2001 “Postscript to Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content.” In Truth and the Absence of Fact. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1975 The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1981 “The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy.” In Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 257316.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1998a Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1998b In Critical Condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1952 “On Sense and Meaning.” In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Edited by Geach, P. and Black, M.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 5678.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1976 “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.” In Philosophical Logic. Edited by Strawson, P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1738.Google Scholar
Gettier, E. 1963Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?Analysis, 23: 121–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettier, E. 1992 A Prosentential Theory of Truth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grover, D., Camp, J., and Belnap, N. 1975A Prosentential Theory of Truth.” philosophical Studies, 27: 73124. Reprinted in Grover 1992, pp. 70–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A. 1993A Critique of Deflationism.” Philosophical Topics, 21: 5781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, J. 1999 “A Perspective on Truth and Meaning.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Hahn, L.. Peru, IL.: Open Court, pp. 671–86.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 1990 Truth. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 1998 Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwich, P. 1999 “The Minimalist Conception of Truth.” In Truth. Edited by Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239–63.Google Scholar
Hull, D. 2000 Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1993Robust Deflationism.” Philosophical Review, 103: 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. 1975Outline of a Theory of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy, 72: 690716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980 Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leeds, S. 1978Theories of Reference and Truth.” Erkenntnis, 13: 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. 2000 “How to Acquire a Representational Theory of Mind.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Edited by Sperber, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, C. 1998Deflating Truth: Pragmatism vs. Minimalism.” The Monist, 81: 407–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, A. 1989NOA's Ark-Fine for Realism.” Philosophical Quarterly, 39: 383–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975 “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’ “In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1990 “Is Water Necessarily H20?” In Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 5479.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1953 From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1986 Philosophy of Logic. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1987 Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. 1927Facts and Propositions.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 7: 152–70.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. 2000 Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schantz, R. 2000 “Truth, Correspondence, and Reference: How Deflationists Diverge from Tarski.” In Circularity, Definition, and Truth. Edited by Chapuis, A. and Gupta, A.. New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research, pp. 317–32.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 1999 Understanding Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1950Truth.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 24: 129–56.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. 1944 “The Semantic Conception of Truth.” In Semantics and the Philosophy of Language. Edited by Linsky, L.. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1952, pp. 1347.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. 1956 “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 152277.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1980 “What Would Be a Substantial Theory of Truth?” In Philosophical Subjects: Essays Presented to P. F. Strawson. Edited by van Straaten, Z.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–221.Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1976 What Is Truth? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. 1992 Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. 1999 “Truth: A Traditional Debate Reviewed.” In Truth. Edited by Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 203–38.Google Scholar