Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-01T07:22:42.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Predication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

George Englebretsen
George Englebretsen
Affiliation:
Bishop's University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussions/Notes
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 627 - 628
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Dialogue, 16 (1977), pp. 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Sommers, F., “Do We Need Identity?” Journal of Philosophy, 66 (1969), pp. 499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Lockwood, M., “On Predicating Proper Names,” Philosophical Review, 84 (1975), pp. 471–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 This was Aristotle's theory, at least. I have discussed it in detail in “On Propositional Form,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 21 (1980), pp. 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Leibniz: Logical Papers, ed. Parkinson, G.H.R. (Oxford, 1966), p. 66.Google Scholar

5 See: “The Calculus of Terms,” Mind, 79 (1970)Google Scholar; “On Concepts of Truth in Natural Languages,” Review of Metaphysics, 23 (1969)Google Scholar; and “The Logical and the Extra-Logical,” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 14 (1973)Google Scholar.

6 Parkinson, pp. 88–89.

7 See especially “The Calculus of Terms.”

8 Parkinson, p. 115.

9 See especially “On a Fregean Dogma,” Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics, ed. Lakatos, I. (Amsterdam, 1967)Google Scholar, and “Do We Need Identity?”

10 Most clearly in “The Calculus of Terms.”

11 I have examined this process in Three Logicians: Aristotle, Leibniz, and Sommers and the Syllogistic, Van Gorcum, forthcoming.