Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:40:27.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Le mythe fondateur de l’empirisme : le donné épistémologique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2013

AUDE BANDINI
AUDE BANDINI*
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

La critique sellarsienne du «mythe du donné» touche en son cœur le projet empiriste fondationnaliste, dont elle entend néanmoins sauvegarder les intuitions épistémologiques et ontologiques saines. Pour ce faire, les difficultés dirimantes soulevées par l’usage de la notion de donné doivent être d’abord clairement identifiées, puis désamorcées. Ceci aboutit à la fois à une redéfinition précautionneuse du donné comme un concept non épistémologique, et à une révision de la conception traditionnelle du rapport entre observation et théorie, connaissance directe et connaissance inférentielle.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 341 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Austin, John Langshaw 1971 Le langage de la perception, trad. Gochet, P., Paris, Armand Colin.Google Scholar
BonJour, Laurence 1985 The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 1985 (voir spécifiquement le ch. IV). Nous proposons ici notre propre formulation du dilemme sellarsien. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Francis Herbert 1930 Appearance and Reality, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 1997 «Study Guide», dans Sellars, W., Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Brandom, R., dir., Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, Charlie Dunbar 1925 The Mind and Its Place in Nature, Londres, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1997 «Empirisme, sémantique et ontologie», dans Signification et nécessité, trad. de Rouilhan, P. et Rivenc, F., Paris, Gallimard, p. 311-335.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 2002 La construction logique du monde, trad. Rivain, T., Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul Karl 1981 Problems of Empiricism: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gowans, Christopher 1989 «Two Concepts of the Given in C. I. Lewis: Realism and Foundationalism», Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 27, no 4, p. 573–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Thomas Hill 1883 Prolegomena to Ethics, Bradley, A. C., dir., Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving 1946 An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, La Salle (IL), The Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving 1952 «The Given Element in Empirical Knowledge», The Philosophical Review, vol. 61, no 2, p. 168–175.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving 1956 Mind and the World-Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge [1929], New York (NY), Dover.Google Scholar
Lyons, Jack C. 2008 «Evidence, Experience, and Externalism», Australian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 86, no 3, p. 461–479.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 2009 «Why Is Sellars’s Essay Called “ Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”?», dans Having the World in View — Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, p. 221-238.Google Scholar
Moore, George Edward 1939 «Proof of an External World», Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 25, p. 273–300.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto 1959 «Protocol Sentences», dans Ayer, A. J., dir., Logical Positivism, New York (NY), Free Press, p. 199-208.Google Scholar
Piatt, Donald A. 1935 «That Will-O’-the-Wisp, The Innocent Inscrutable Given», The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 32, no 13, p. 337–350.Google Scholar
Price, Henry Habberley 1973 Perception [1932], Londres, Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman 1969 «Epistemology naturalized», dans Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York (NY), Columbia University Press, p. 69-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman 1996 «Les deux dogmes de l’empirisme», dans Jacob, P., dir., De Vienne à Cambridge — L’héritage du positivisme logique, Paris, Gallimard, p. 93-105.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman 2008 Relativité de l’ontologie et autres essais, trad. Largeault, J. [1977], Sandra Laugier, dir., Paris, Aubier, 2008.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans 1948 «Rationalism and Empiricism: An Inquiry into the Roots of Philosophical Error», The Philosophical Review, vol. 57, no 4, p. 330–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Jay F. 2007 Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the Images, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Jacob J. 1970 The Appeal to the Given (A Study in Epistemology), Londres, Allen et Unwin.Google Scholar
Royce, Josiah 1976 The World and the Individual [1899–1901], Gloucester (MA), Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1989 Problèmes de philosophie, trad. Rivenc, F., Paris, Payot.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 2007 «La relation des sense-data à la physique», dans Mysticisme et Logique, Vernant, Denis, dir., Paris, Vrin, p. 141-166.Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz 1959 «The Foundation of Knowledge», dans Ayer, A. J., dir., Logical Positivism, New York (NY), Free Press, p. 209-227.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1956 «Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind», Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 1, p. 253–329.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1973 Givenness and Explanatory Coherence», The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, no 18, p. 612–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1974 Meaning as Functionnal Classification», Synthese, vol. 27, nos3-4, p. 417–437.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1976 «Is Scientific Realism Tenable?», PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 1976, vol. 2, p. 307–334.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1979 «More on Givenness and Explanatory Coherence», dans Dancy, Jonathan, dir., Justification and Knowledge, Dordrecht, Reidel, p. 211-227.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1981 «Foundations for a Metaphysics of Pure Process: The Carus Lectures of Wilfrid Sellars», The Monist, vol. 64, p. 3–90.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1991 «Some Reflections on Language Games» [1954], dans Science, Perception and Reality, Atascadero (CA), Ridgeview Publishing Co., p. 321–358.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1992a Empirisme et philosophie de l’esprit [1956], trad. Cayla, Fabien, Paris, l’Éclat.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1992b Science and Metaphysics; Variations on Kantian Themes [1968], Atascadero (CA), Ridgeview Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 2002 «La philosophie et l’image scientifique de l’homme», dans Philosophie de l’Esprit, Psychologie du sens commun et sciences de l’esprit, Fisette, Denis et Poirier, Pierre, dir., Paris, Vrin, p. 55-115.Google Scholar
Triplett, Timm et deVries, Willem A. 2000 Knowledge, Mind and the Given, Reading Wilfrid Sellars’ «Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind», Indianapolis (IN), Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas 1975 «Wilfrid Sellars on Scientific Realism», Dialogue, vol. 14, p. 606–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas 1976 «On the Radical Incompleteness of the Manifest Image», PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 1976, vol. 2, p. 335–343.Google Scholar
Wild, John 1940 «The Concept of the Given in Contemporary Philosophy — Its Origin and Limitations», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 1, no 1, p. 70–82.Google Scholar