Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T07:45:28.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Le langage forme-t-il une condition nécessaire de la rationalité?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Joëlle Proust
Joëlle Proust
Affiliation:
C.N.R.S., Institut Jean-Nicod
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium/Tribune du livre
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , Winter 2007 , pp. 165 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K. et Rao, R. P. N. 1997 «Deictic Codes for the Embodiment of Cognition», Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 20, n° 4, p. 723–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brentano, F. 1874 Psychologie vom Empirischen Standpunkt, 3 vols., Leipzig, Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Call, J., et Tomasello, M. 1999 «A Non-Verbal Theory of Mind Test: The Performance of Children and Apes», Child Development, vol. 70, p. 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. M. 1957 Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca [NY], Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
De Sousa, R. 1984 «Teleology and the Great Shift», The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 81, p. 647–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sousa, R. 2004 Évolution et rationalité, Paris, Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Dupuy, J. P. 1994 Aux origines des sciences cognitives, Paris, Éditions La Découverte.Google Scholar
Gallistel, R. C. 1990 The Organization of Learning, Cambridge [MA], MIT Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 1996 Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature, Cambridge [MA], Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, R. R. 2001 «Rhesus Monkeys Know When They Remember», Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 98, p. 5359–5362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, P. 2004 L'intentionnalité, Paris, Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. 1982 La logique des noms propres, Paris, Minuit.Google Scholar
McAlister, L. 1974 «Chisholm and Brentano on Intentionality», Review of Metaphysics, vol. 28, n° 2, p. 328–338.Google Scholar
Proust, J. 1997 Comment l'esprit vient aux bêtes, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Proust, J. 1999 «Mind, Space and Objectivity in Non-Human Animals», Erkenntnis, vol. 511, p. 41–58.Google Scholar
Proust, J. 2002a «Imitation et agentivité», dans J. Nadel et J. Decety, dir., Imiter pour découvrir l'humain, Paris, Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Proust, J. 2002b «Can “Radical” Theories of Simulation Explain Mental Concept Acquisition?», dans J. Dokic et J. Proust, dir., Simulation and Knowledge of Action, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, p. 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proust, J. 2003 Les animaux pensent-ils?, Paris, Bayard.Google Scholar
Proust, J. 2006 «Rationality and Metacognition in Non-Human Animals», dans S. Hurley et M. Nudds, dir., Rational Animals?, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. 2001 «Visual Indexes, Preconceptual Objects, and Situated Vision», Cognition, vol. 80, p. 127–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E., et Washburn, D. A. 2003 «The Comparative Psychology of Uncertainty Monitoring and Metacognition», Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 26, n° 3, p. 317–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterelny, K. 2003 Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Call, J. et Hare, B. 2003 «Chimpanzees Understand Psychological States — The Question Is Which Ones and to What Extent», Trends in Cognitive Science, vol. 74, p. 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar