Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:46:36.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Iterations and Explications on Relevance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2010

F. E. Sparshott
F. E. Sparshott
Affiliation:
Victoria College, Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes—Discussion
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1973 , pp. 330 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a little more on this theme, see Sparshott, F. E., Looking for Philosophy (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1972), p. 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 The article to which Nickel refers is an elaboration of part of my Enquiry into Goodness (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1958), in which relevance is a central but undefined term. The constant theme of my substantive work in philosophy has been the desirability, in a world of rapid change, of replacing doctrines by evaluative and prudential strategies in terms of which all thinkable policies are defensible but not all defences are equally sensible. A definition of relevance in terms of what the average man believes to be relevant would not represent such a strategy.