Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:33:01.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Asking What Women Want the Right Question? Underrepresentation in Philosophy and Gender Differences in Interests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2018

STACEY GOGUEN
STACEY GOGUEN*
Affiliation:
Northeastern Illinois University
*
*<[email protected]>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In discussions of the underrepresentation of women in professional philosophy, those sceptical of discrimination as an explanation often suggest that gender differences in interests are a plausible alternative hypothesis. Some suspect that if women’s differing interests explains underrepresentation, then interventions suggested by the discrimination hypothesis might be unnecessary—or even risky. I argue that one needs to consider how stereotypes might influence interests, and that doing so can provide a more even-handed assessment of the risks involved in proposed interventions.

Dans les discussions concernant la sous-représentation des femmes dans le domaine de la philosophie professionnelle, ceux et celles qui sont sceptiques quant à l’explication par la discrimination suggèrent souvent que les différences de genre dans les intérêts constituent une autre hypothèse possible. Certain.e.s croient que si les intérêts différents des femmes expliquaient la sous-représentation, les interventions suggérées par l’hypothèse de la discrimination ne seraient pas nécessaires, voire seraient risquées. Je maintiens qu’on doit considérer la façon dont les stéréotypes exerceraient une influence sur les intérêts, et que ce faisant, on peut offrir une évaluation plus équilibrée des risques découlant des interventions proposées.

Keywords

underrepresentation of womeninterestsstereotypesstereotype threatbelonging uncertaintyinductive riskboundaries of philosophy
Type
Special Issue: Philosophy and its Borders
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 409 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda, ed. 2003 Singing in the Fire: Stories of Women in Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Allen-Hermanson, Sean 2017 “Leaky Pipeline Myths: In Search of Gender Effects on the Job Market and Early Career Publishing in Philosophy.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 953. <http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00953/full>.Google Scholar
Antony, Louise 2012 “Different Voices or Perfect Storm: Why Are There So Few Women in Philosophy?” Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3): 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arisaka, Yoko 2001 “Reflections on ‘What is Philosophy? The Status of Non-Western Philosophy in the Profession.’” APA Newsletter on Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies 1 (1): 31–33.Google Scholar
Baron, Sam, Dougherty, Tom, and Miller, Kristie 2015 “Why Is There Female Under-Representation among Philosophy Majors?” Ergo 2 (14): 329–365.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon 2003 The Essential Difference: The Truth about the Male and Female Brain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bastion, Michelle 2013 “Finding Time for Philosophy,” in Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?, Hutchinson, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 215–228.Google Scholar
Beebee, Helen, and Saul, Jennifer 2011 “Women in Philosophy in the UK: A Report by the British Philosophical Association and the Society for Women in Philosophy UK.” British Philosophical Association. <http://www.bpa.ac.uk/uploads/2011/02/BPA_Report_Women_In_Philosophy.pdf>.Google Scholar
Benétreau-Dupin, Yann, and Beaulac, Guillaume 2015 “Fair Numbers: What Data Can and Cannot Tell us about the Underrepresentation of Women in Philosophy.” Ergo 2 (3): 59–81.Google Scholar
Berenbaum, Sheri A. 1999 “Effects of Early Androgens on Sex-Typed Activities and Interests in Adolescents with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia.” Hormones and Behavior 35 (1): 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botts, Tina Fernandes, Kofi Bright, Liam, Cherry, Myisha, Mallarangeng, Guntur, and Spencer, Quayshawn 2014 “What is the State of Blacks in Philosophy?” Critical Philosophy of Race 2 (2): 224–242.Google Scholar
Bowles, Hannah. 2014 “Why Women Don’t Negotiate Their Job Offers.” Harvard Business Review. <https://hbr.org/2014/06/why-women-dont-negotiate-their-job-offers/>.Google Scholar
Bowles, Hannah Riley, Babcock, Linda, and Lai, Lei 2007 “Social Incentives for Gender Differences in the Propensity to Initiate Negotiations: Sometimes it Does Hurt to Ask.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103 (1): 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 2009 “The Undergraduate Pipeline Problem.” Hypatia 24 (2): 216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 2015 “Precluded Interests.” Hypatia 30 (2): 475–485.Google Scholar
Castle, Cora 1913 A Statistical Study of Eminent Women. New York: The Science Press. <https://archive.org/details/statisticalstudy00castrich>.Google Scholar
Census Bureau, United States 2015 “Quick Facts.” <https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/00>..>Google Scholar
Crasnow, Sharon 2009 “What Do the Numbers Mean?” APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 8 (2): 13–16.Google Scholar
Crouch, Margaret 2012 “Implicit Bias and Gender (and Other Sorts of) Diversity in Philosophy and the Academy in the Context of the Corporatized University.” Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3): 212–226.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Christopher 2015 “Pre-college Causes of Women’s Underrepresentation in Philosophy.” Thesis. Georgia State University.Google Scholar
Dodds, Susan, and Goddard, Eliza 2013 “Not Just a Pipeline Problem: Improving Women’s Participation in Philosophy of Australia,” in Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?, Hutchinson, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 143–161.Google Scholar
Dotson, Kristie 2013 “How Is This Paper Philosophy?” Comparative Philosophy 3 (1): 3–29.Google Scholar
Dotson, Kristie 2011 “Concrete Flowers: Contemplating the Profession of Philosophy.” Hypatia 26 (2): 403–409.Google Scholar
Doucet, Mathieu, and Beaulac, Guillaume 2013 “Report of the CPA Equity Survey: historical trends.” The Canadian Philosophical Association. <https://www.acpcpa.ca/cpages/reports>..>Google Scholar
Douglas, Heather 2000 “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–579.Google Scholar
Elliot, Kevin, and Richards, Ted, eds. 2017 Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feng, Jing, Spence, Ian, and Pratt, Jay 2007 “Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Cognition.” Psychological Science 18 (10): 850–855.Google Scholar
Flore, Paulette, and Wicherts, Jelte 2015 “Does Stereotype Threat Influence Performance of Girls in Stereotyped Domains? A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of School Psychology 53 (1): 25–44.Google Scholar
Fogliati, Vincent, and Bussey, Kay 2013 “Stereotype Threat Reduces Motivation to Improve: Effects of Stereotype Threat and Feedback on Women’s Intentions to Improve Mathematical Ability.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 37 (3): 310–324.Google Scholar
Forbes, Chad, Schmader, Toni, and Allen, John J.B. 2008 “The Role of Devaluing and Discounting in Performance Monitoring: A Neurophysiological Study of Minorities under Threat.” SCAN 3 (3): 253–261.Google Scholar
Gines, Kathryn T. 2011 “Being a Black Woman Philosopher: Reflections on Founding the Collegium of Black Women Philosophers.” Hypatia 26 (2): 430–437.Google Scholar
Goguen, Stacey. 2016 “Stereotype Threat, Epistemic Injustice, and Rationality” in Implicit Bias & Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Brownstein, Michael and Saul, Jennifer (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 216–237.Google Scholar
Handley, Ian M., Brown, Elizabeth R., Moss-Racusin, Corinne A., and Smith, Jessi L. 2015 “Quality of Evidence Revealing Subtle Gender Biases in Science is in the Eye of the Beholder.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (43): 13201–13206.Google Scholar
Hansen, Katherine, Gerbasi, Margaret, Todorov, Alexander, Kruse, Elliott, and Pronin, Emily 2014 “People Claim Objectivity After Knowingly Using Biased Strategies.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40 (6): 691–699.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally 2008 “Changing the Ideology and Culture of Philosophy: Not by Reason (Alone).” Hypatia 23 (2): 210–223.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Kelly M., Trawalter, Sophie, Axt, Jordan R., and Norman Oliver, M. 2015 “Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs about Biological Differences between Blacks and Whites.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (16): 4296–4301.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Diane E., and Tarzian, Anita J. 2001 “The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias Against Women in the Treatment of Pain.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 29 (1): 13–27.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Katrina, and Jenkins, Fiona, eds. 2013 Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huguet, Pascal, Brunot, Sophie, and Monteil, Jean Marc 2001 “Geometry versus Drawing: Changing the Meaning of the Task as a Means to Change Performance.” Social Psychology of Education 4 (3-4): 219–234.Google Scholar
Inzlicht, Michael, and Schmader, Toni 2011 Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan-Young, Rebecca 2011 Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, Meena, Liao, Shen-yi, Deveaux, Monique, and Dalecki, Maggie Forthcoming “The Underrepresentation of Women in Prestigious Ethics Journals.” Hypatia.Google Scholar
Kruger, Justin, and Dunning, David 1999 “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–1134.Google Scholar
Kugler, Matthew 2007 “Valuing Thoughts, Ignoring Behavior: The Introspection Illusion as a Source of the Bias Blind Spot.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (4): 565–578.Google Scholar
Manne, Kate 2015 “Letter to the Editor.” July 22. The Times Literary Supplement. Archived: <http://dailynous.com/2015/07/15/is-philosophy-to-stupid-for-women/>.Google Scholar
Marcous, Carmen Maria 2014 “How to Solve the Diversity Problem.” APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 13 (2): 22–27.Google Scholar
Major, Brenda, Spencer, Steven, Schmader, Toni, Wolfe, Connie, and Crocker, Jennifer 1998 “Coping with Negative Stereotypes about Intellectual Performance: The Role of Psychological Disengagement.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (1): 34–50.Google Scholar
Moss-Racusin, Corinne A., Dovidio, John F., Brescoll, Victoria L., Graham, Mark J., and Handelsman, Jo 2012 “Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (41): 16474–16479.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mary, Steele, Claude, and Gross, James 2007 “Signaling Threat: How Situational Cues Affect Women in Math, Science, and Engineering Settings.” Psychological Science 18 (10): 879–885.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics 2013 “Digest of Education Statistics.” <http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_318.10.asp>..>Google Scholar
Norlock, Kathryn 2012 “Gender Perception as a Habit of Moral Perception: Implications for Philosophical Methodology and Introductory Curriculum.” Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3): 347–362.Google Scholar
Norlock, Kathryn 2011 “Women in the Profession: A Report to the CSW,” 2011 Update. American Philosophical Association. <http://www.apaonlinecsw.org/workshops-and-summer-institutes>.Google Scholar
Nuccetelli, Susana 2003 “Is ‘Latin American Thought’ Philosophy?” Metaphilosophy 34 (4): 524–536.Google Scholar
Papineau, David 2015 “Snookered” The Times Literary Supplement. <http://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/private/snookered/>.Google Scholar
Paxton, Molly, Figdor, Carrie, and Tiberius, Valerie 2012 “Quantifying the Gender Gap: An Empirical Study of the Underrepresentation of Women in Philosophy.” Hypatia 27 (4): 949–957.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 2005 “Sex Ed.” New Republic. <https://newrepublic.com/article/68044/sex-ed>.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 2008 The Sexual Paradox: Men, Women, and the Real Gender Gap. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Rini, Adriane 2013 “Models and Values: Why Did New Zealand Philosophy Departments Stop Hiring Women Philosophers?” in Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?, Hutchinson, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 127–142.Google Scholar
Schmader, Toni 2002 “Gender Identification Moderates Stereotype Threat’s Effects on Women’s Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38 (1): 194–201.Google Scholar
Sesardic, Nevan, and Clercq, Rafael De 2014 “Women in Philosophy: Problems with the Discrimination Hypothesis.” Academic Questions 27 (4): 461–473. <https://www.nas.org/articles/women_in_philosophy_problems_with_the_discrimination_hypothesis>.Google Scholar
Sekaquaptewa, Denise, and Thompson, Mischa 2003 “Solo Status, Stereotype Threat, and Performance Expectancies: Their Effects of Women’s Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39 (1): 68–74.Google Scholar
Smith, Jessi, Sansone, Caron, and White, Paul 2007 “The Stereotyped Task Engagement Process: The Role of Interest and Achievement Motivation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (1): 99–114.Google Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth 2005 “Sex Differences in Intrinsic Aptitude for Mathematics and Science?: A Critical Review.” American Psychologist 60 (9): 950–958.Google Scholar
Spencer, Steven, Steele, Claude, and Quinn, Diane 1999 “Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1): 4–28.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada 2011 “Population by Broad Age Groups and Sex, 2011 Counts for Both Sexes, for Canada, Provinces and Territories.” Census. <http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/hlt-fst/as-sa/index-eng.cfm?Lang=E>..>Google Scholar
Statistics Canada 2011 “Education in Canada: Attainment, Field of Study and Location of Study.” <http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-012-x/99-012-x2011001-eng.cfm>..>Google Scholar
Steele, Claude, and Aronson, Joshua 1995 “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (5): 797–811.Google Scholar
Steele, Claude, Spencer, Steven, and Aronson, Joshua 2002 “Contending with Group Image: The Psychology of Stereotype and Social Identity Threat.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 34: 379–440.Google Scholar
Summers, Lawrence H. 2005 “Remarks at NBER Conference on Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce.” The Office of the President, Harvard University. <http://www.harvard.edu/president/speeches/summers_2005/nber.php>.Google Scholar
Thoman, Dustin, Smith, Jessi, Brown, Elizabeth, Chase, Justin, and Lee, Joo Young 2013 “Beyond Performance: A Motivational Experiences Model of Stereotype Threat.” Educational Psychology Review 25 (2): 211–243.Google Scholar
Thompson, Morgan, Adleberg, Toni, Sims, Sam, and Nahmias, Eddy 2016 “Why Do Women Leave Philosophy? Surveying Students at the Introductory Level.” Philosopher’s Imprint 16 (6): 1–36.Google Scholar
Thompson, Morgan 2017 “Explanations of the Gender Gap in Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 12 (3): 1–12.Google Scholar
Tremain, Shelley 2013 “Introducing Feminist Philosophy of Disability.” Disability Studies Quarterly 33 (4). <http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3877>.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, Eric Luis, and Cohen, Geoffrey 2005 “Constructed Criteria: Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination.” Psychological Science 16 (6): 474–480.Google Scholar
Uttal, David, Meadow, Nathaniel, Tipton, Elizabeth, Hand, Linda, Alden, Alison, Warren, Christopher, and Newcombe, Nora 2013 “The Malleability of Spatial Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Training Studies.” Psychological Bulletin 139 (2): 352–402.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret 2005 “Diotima’s Ghost: The Uncertain Place of Feminist Philosophy in Professional Philosophy.” Hypatia 20 (3): 153–164.Google Scholar
Walton, Gregory, and Cohen, Geoffrey 2007 “A Question of Belonging: Race, Social Fit, and Achievement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (1): 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yancy, George, ed. 1998 African-American Philosophers: 17 Conversations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yancy, George, ed. 2007 Philosophy in Multiple Voices. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Zack, Naomi, ed. 2000 Women of Color and Philosophy: A Critical Reader. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar