Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:33:34.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Complexity in Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

R. Paul Thompson
R. Paul Thompson
Affiliation:
Scarborough College, University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rolf Gruner (1977) has argued that natural selection plus time does not entail, and hence does not explain, evolution. This according to Gruner is the result of the undeniable fact that evolution involves an increase in the complexity of organisms:

Since increase in complexity is part of the concept of evolution, evolution is not explained by the theory of natural selection. The Darwinian or Neo-Darwinian affirms the reality of evolution and seems to believe that it can be accounted for in terms of natural selection. But it could be accounted for in this way only if the assumption were justified that generally the more complex organism is better adapted to its environment, and thus stands a better chance to survive and breed, than the less complex organism. And this assumption is not justified. “The more complex, the better adapted” will not do even as a rule of thumb, as most biologists today will be prepared to admit (711).

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 255 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blum, H. F., Time's Arrow and Evolution (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Bronowski, J., “New Concepts in the Evolution of Complexity: Stratified Stability and Unbounded Plans”, Zygon 5 (1970), 1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A., The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruner, R., “On Evolution and its Relation to Natural Selection”, Dialogue 16 (1977), 708–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C., “Adaptation”, Scientific American 239 (09 1978), 212–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. Maynard, “The Status of Neo-Darwinism”, in Towards a Theoretical Biology, ed. Waddington, C. H., vol. 2 (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1969).Google Scholar
Rensch, B., Biophilosophy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Saunders, P. T. and Ho, M. W., “On the Increase in Complexity in Evolution”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 63 (1976), 375–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stebbins, G. L., Processes of Organic Evolution (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966).Google Scholar
Wicken, J. S., “The Generation of Complexity in Evolution: A Thermodynamic and Information-Theoretical Discussion”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 77 (1979), 349–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed