Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:40:32.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Desired and the Desirable in Dewey's Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1963

Irving Block
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario.

Extract

That x is desired is a necessary but not a sufficient ground for claiming that x is good or that x ought to be or that x is desirable—and these three phrases I take to be synonymous for Dewey. Everything that is desirable is desired but it is not the case that everything that is desired is desirable. What else is needed to make a desire desirable is the main burden of Dewey's ethics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 John Dewey, Logic, The Theory of Inquiry, Henry Holt, 1938, p. 66.

2 I have used quotes around this word to indicate that I have been using it as Dewey uses it in his specific meaning of the word. Hereafter, the quotes will be dropped with the understanding that I still intend Dewey's meaning of the term.

3 Ibid., p. 165.

4 Ibid., p. 68–9, The italicized words are Dewey's.

5 John Dewey, Quest for Certainty; Minton, Balch & Co., 1929, p. 277

6 D. W. Prall, Collected Papers; see articles of the discussion between Dewey and Prall in the Journal of Philosophy, 1943.

7 Philosophical Review No. 58, 1949.

8 John Dewey, Philosopher of Science and Freedom, ed. S. Hook, p. 194.

9 Quest for Certainty, p. 276.