Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:24:38.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descriptions, référence et anaphore*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Richard Vallée
Richard Vallée
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dans le paradigme russellien (Russell, 1905), les termes dénotants ou termes quantifiés (Neale, 1990) comme «plusieurs hommes», «quelques hommes», «tous les hommes», sont analysés à l'aide de quantificateurs, de variables, de prédicats et de connecteurs logiques à l'intérieur de phrases complètes exprimant des propositions générales. Les descriptions définies comme les descriptions indéfinies y sont aussi traitées comme des termes quantifiés.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , Fall 1994 , pp. 611 - 634
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Chastain, C. 1975 «Reference and Context». Dans K. Gunderson, dir., Language, Mind, and Knowledge (Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol. 7). Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, p. 194–269.Google Scholar
Church, A. 1942 «Review of Quine's “Whitehead and the Rise of Modern Logic”». Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 6–8, p. 100–101.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. 1979 «The Interpretation of Pronouns». Dans F. Heny et H. Schnelle, dir., Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 10: Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table. New York, Academic Press, p. 61–92.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 1981 Meaning, Quantification and Necessity. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Donnellan, K. S. 1978 «Speaker Reference, Descriptions, and Anaphora». Dans P. Cole, dir., Pragmatics (Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9). New York, Academic Press, p. 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. 1977 «Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses 1». Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 7, p 467–536. Aussi dans Evans, 1985, p. 76–152.Google Scholar
Evans, G. 1980 «Pronouns». Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 11, p. 337–362. Aussi dans Evans, 1985, p. 214–248.Google Scholar
Evans, G. 1982 The Varieties of Reference. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. 1985 Collected Papers. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. et Sag, I. 1982 «Referential and Quantificational Indefinites». Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 5, p. 355–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamut, L. T. F. 1991 Logic, Language, and Meaning. Vol. 2: Intensional Logic and Logical Grammar. Traduit du hollandais. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1962 Reference and Generality. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, I. 1988 The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. New York et Londres, Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. 1989 «Demonstratives». Dans J. Almog, J. Perry et H. Wettstein, dir, Themes from Kaplan. New York, Oxford University Press, p. 481–563.Google Scholar
King, J. C. 1988 «Are Indefinite Descriptions Ambiguous?» Philosophical Studies, vol. 53, p. 417–440.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1977 «Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference”. Dans P. French, T. Uehling et H. Wettstein, dir., Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, p. 6–27.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1979 «Scorekeeping in a Language Game». Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 8, p. 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, P. et Neale, S. 1991 «Indefinite Descriptions : In Defense of Russell». Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 14, p. 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, S. 1990 Descriptions. Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Richards, B. 1984 «On Interpreting Pronouns». Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 7, p. 287–324.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1905 «On Denoting». Mind, vol. 14, p. 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, S. 1989 «Review of Evans». The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 84, p. 141–156.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1950 «On Referring». Mind, vol. 59, p. 320–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1952 Introduction to Logical Theory. Londres, Methuen.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. 1984 «Pronouns and Pronominal Descriptions: A New Semantical Category», Philosophical Studies, vol. 45, p. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar