Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:29:46.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descartes's Dilemma of Eminent Containment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Geoffrey Gorham
Geoffrey Gorham
Affiliation:
Macalester College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , Winter 2003 , pp. 3 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariew, Roger 1999 Descartes and the Last Scholastics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bedau, Mark 1986 “Cartesian Interaction.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 10: 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan 2001 Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broughton, Janet 1986 “Adequate Causes and Natural Kinds.” In Human Nature and Natural Knowledge: Essays Presented to Marjorie Grene on the Occasion of Her Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Edited by Donagan, Alan, Petrovich, Anthony, and Wedin, Michael. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Chávez-Arvizo, Enrique 1997 “Descartes Interactionism and His Principle of Causality.” European Legacy, 7: 959–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clatterbaugh, Kenneth 1980 “Descartes's Causal Likeness Principle.” Philosophical Review, 89: 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, John 1986 Descartes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1985 The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. 2 vols. Edited by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1991 The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: The Correspondence. Edited by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, and Kenny, Anthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René 1996 Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 vols. Edited by Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel 1993 “Descartes and Occasionalism.” In Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Edited by Nadler, Steven. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1995 “J-B Morin and the Second Objections.” In Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies. Edited by Ariew, Roger and Grene, Marjorie. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gorham, Geoffrey 1999 “Causation and Similarity in Descartes.” In New Essays on the Rationalists. Edited by Gennaro, R. and Huenemann, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gorham, Geoffrey 2002 “Descartes on the Innateness of All Ideas.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 32: 355–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, David, and Hausman, Alan 1997 Descartes's Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early Modern Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas 1987 “Descartes and the Action of Body on Mind.” Studia Leibnitiana, 19, 1:41–53.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony 1968 Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas4 1998 “The Cartesian Dialectic of Creation.” In Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy. Edited by Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Eileen 1987 “Mind-Body Interaction and Metaphysical Consistency: A Defense of Descartes.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 25: 227–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radner, Daisie 1985 “Is There a Problem of Cartesian Interaction?” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 23: 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad 1997 “Descartes on Innate Ideas, Sensation and Scholasticism: The Response to Regius.” In Oxford Studies in the History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Studies in Seventeenth-Century European Philosophy. Edited by Stewart, M. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad 2000 “The Disappearance of Analogy in Descartes, Spinoza, and Regis.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 30: 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secada, Jorge 2000 Cartesian Metaphysics: The Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch 1982 The Ethics and Selected Letters. Translated by Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Suarez, Francisco 1947 On the Various Kinds of Distinctions: Disputation VII. Translated by Vollert, Cyril. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Suarez, Francisco 1994 On Efficient Causality: Metaphysical Disputations 17–19. Translated by Freddoso, Alfred J.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Suarez, Francisco 1998 “Metaphysical Disputations.” In Descartes's Meditations: Background Source Materials. Edited and Translated by Ariew, Roger, Cottingham, John, and Sorell, Tom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suarez, Francisco 2000 On the Formal Cause of Substance: Metaphysical Disputation 15. Translated by Kronen, John and Reedy, Jeremiah. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Vinci, Thomas 1998 Cartesian Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret 1991 “Descartes on the Origin of Sensation.” Philosophical Topics, 19: 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar