Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:55:36.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descartes and Gadamer on Prejudice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Donald Ipperciel
Donald Ipperciel
Affiliation:
Faculté Saint-Jean (University of Alberta)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , Fall 2002 , pp. 635 - 652
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cauchy, Venant 1973 “La conception du philosophe à l'epoque post-aristotélicienne: diathèse et logos.” In La philosophie et les philosophes. Montréal: Les Éditions Bellarmin, pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1963 “Les règles pour la direction de l'esprit.” Oeuvres philosophiques. Edited by Alquié, F.. Paris: Gamier Frères, Vol. 1, pp. 67–204.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1984a “The Search for Truth by Means of the Natural Light.” In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 2. Translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 400–20.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1984b “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 2. Translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–383.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1985a “Discourse on the Method.” In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 1. Translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–51.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1985b “The Passions of the Soul.” In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 1. Translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René 1985c “Principles of Philosophy.” In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 1. Translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–291.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1985d “Rules for the Direction of the Mind.” In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 1. Translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René 1991 “Letter to Voetius, May 1643.” In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 3. Translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 220–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René 1996a “Discours de la méthode.” In Oeuvres. Vol. 6. Edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin, pp. iii–78.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1996b “Les passions de l';âame.” In Oeuvres. Vol. 11. Edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin, pp. 291–497.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1996c “Les principes de la philosophie.” In Oeuvres. Vol. 9. Edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin, pp. 1–362.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1996d “Regulae ad directionem ingenii.” In Oeuvres. Vol. 10. Edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin, pp. 348–488.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1996e “Recherche de la vérité par la lumière naturelle.” In Oeuvres. Vol. 10. Edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin, pp. 489–532.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1996f “Meditationes de prima philosophia.” In Oeuvres. Vol. 7. Edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1996g “Principia philosophiae.” In Oeuvres. Vol. 8. Edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin, pp. 1–353.Google Scholar
Detmer, David 1997 “Gadamer's Critique of the Enlightenment.” In The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 275–86.Google Scholar
Frank, M. 1985 Das individuelle Allgemeine. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1940 “Ernesto Grassi, Vom Vorrang des Logos.” In Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 5. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1985, pp. 310–15.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1953 “Wahrheit in den Geisteswissenschaften.” InHermeneutik. Vol. 2. Wahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen. Register. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1986, pp. 37–43.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1960a Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1986.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1960b Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward, 1975.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1963 “The Problem of Historical Consciousness.” In Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. Edited by Rabinow, Paul and Sullivan, William M.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987, pp. 82–140.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1965a “Hermeneutik und Historismus.” In Hermeneutik. Vol. 2. Wahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen. Register. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1986, pp. 387–424.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1965b “Über die Planung der Zukunft.” In Hermeneutik. Vol. 2. Wahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen. Register. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1986, pp. 155–73.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1966 “Mensch und Sprache.” In Hermeneutik. Vol. 2. Wahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen. Register. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1986, pp. 147–54.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1968 “Klassische und philosophische Hermeneutik.” In Hermeneutik. Vol. 2. Wahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen. Register. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1986, pp. 92–117.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1972 “Nachwort zur 3. Auflage.” In Hermeneutik. Vol. 2. Wahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen. Register. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1986, pp. 449–78.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1979 “Rationalität im Wandel der Zeiten.” In Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 4. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1987, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1985 “Zwischen Phänomenologie und Dialektik.” In Hermeneutik. Vol. 2. Wahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen. Register. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1986, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1990 “Heraklit-Studien.” In Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 7. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1991, pp. 43–82.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1927a Sein und Zeit. 16th ed.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1986.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1927b Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1976 ”‘Nur noch ein Gott kann uns retten’.” Der Spiegel, Nr. 23, 30. Jahrgang (May 31, 1976): 193–219.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. 1971 Validity in Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 258–64.Google Scholar
Keuth, Herbert 1995 “Zur Kritik am Anspruch einer universalen Hermeneutik.” Philosophia naturalis, 32, 2: 229–47.Google Scholar
Kockelmans, Joseph 1975 “Towards an Interpretative or Hermeneutic Social Science.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 5: 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kögler, Hans-Herbert 1992 Die Macht des Dialogs. Stuttgart: Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitscherling, Jeff 1989 “Philosophical Hermeneutics and ‘;The Tradition.’” Man and World, 22: 247–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, L. M. 1993 “Gadamer and the Enlightenment's ‘Prejudice Against All Prejudices.’;” Clio, 22, 4: 369–76.Google Scholar
Peters, Ted 1974 “The Nature and Role of Presupposition: An Inquiry into Contemporary Hermeneutics.” International Philosophical Quarterly, 14, 2 (June): 208–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachterhauser, Brice R. 1988 “Prejudice, Reason and Force.” Philosophy, 63: 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnke, Georgia 1985 “Hermeneutics and the Social Sciences: A Gadamerian Critique of Rorty.” Inquiry, 28: 339–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnke, Georgia 1994 “Hermeneutics, Tradition and the Standpoint of Women.” In Hermeneutics and Truth.” Edited by Wachterhauser, Brice. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 206–55.Google Scholar
Weinsheimer, Joel C. 1985 Gadamer's Hermeneutics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar