Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:12:26.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Begging the Question?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2010

M. E. Williams
M. E. Williams
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion/Note
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , March 1968 , pp. 567 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Johnson, Oliver A., “Begging the Question,” Dialogue, Vol. VI, No. 2 (September 1967), pp. 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Ibid., p. 135.

3 Ibid., p. 145.

4 Ibid., p. 150.

5 Cf. Ibid., p. 150: “For one who rejects logic, no word can any longer have any meaning because he has no way of affirming a single meaning for it and ruling out incompatible meanings.”

6 Johnson also seems to betray an ontology when he writes: “According to my conclusion we know that a proposition is true if we can demonstrate it to be logically necessary. We are thus entitled to believe that what the proposition asserts is a correct description of the nature of things.”