Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:00:19.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Narrative Constitution of Friendship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

CHRISTOPHER MOORE*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
SAMUEL FREDERICK
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

We argue that friendship is constituted in the practice of narration, not merely identified through psychological or sociological criteria. We show that whether two people have, as Aristotle argues, ‘lived together’ in ‘mutually acknowledged goodwill’ can be determined only through a narrative reconstruction of a shared past. We demonstrate this with a close reading of Thomas Bernhard’s Wittgenstein’s Nephew: A Friendship (1982). We argue that this book provides not only an illustration but also an enactment of the practice of friendship as the urge to redeem—and thus to instantiate—Aristotelian suzên (‘living together’) by means of its telling.

Nous soutenons que l’amitié se constitue dans la pratique de la narration, et n’est donc pas identifiable uniquement par des critères psychologiques ou sociologiques. En effet, que deux personnes aient, comme Aristote le fait valoir, «vécu ensemble» dans la «bienveillance mutuellement reconnue» ne peut être déterminé qu’à travers une reconstruction narrative d’un passé partagé. Cela est démontré par une lecture attentive du Neveu de Wittgenstein : une amitié (1982) de Thomas Bernhard. Nous soutenons que ce livre fournit non seulement une illustration, mais aussi une mise en scène de la pratique de l’amitié comme envie de racheter — et donc d’instancier — par son récit le suzên («vivre ensemble») aristotélicien.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Mark M. 2002 “Fragments of a Deluge: The Theater of Thomas Bernhard’s Prose.” In Konzett, Matthias (Ed.), A Companion to the Works of Thomas Bernhard (pp. 119135). Rochester, NY: Camden House.Google Scholar
Bagley, Benjamin 2015 “Loving Someone in Particular.” Ethics 125 (2): 477507.Google Scholar
Bailey, Derek 1992 Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Barthofer, Alfred 1979 “Wittgenstein mit Maske, Dichtung und Wahrheit in Thomas Bernhards Roman ‘Korrektur.’” Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur 23 (4): 185197.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Thomas 1988 Wittgenstein’s Nephew: A Friendship. McLintock, David (Trans.). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Thomas 2008 “Wittgensteins Neffe.” 1982. In Höller, Hans and Mittelmayer, Manfred (Eds.), Erzählungen III (pp. 207307). Vol. 13 of Huber, Martin and Schmidt-Dengler, Wendelin (Eds.), Werke. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Thomas 2015 Journalistisches, Reden, Interviews. Bayer, Wolfram, Huber, Martin, Mittelmayer, Manfred (Eds.). Vol. 22.1 of Huber, Martin and Schmidt-Dengler, Wendelin (Eds.), Werke. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Betz, Uwe 1997 Polyphone Räume und karnevalisiertes Erbe: Analysen des Werks Thomas Bernhards auf der Basis Bachtinscher Theoreme. Würzburg: Ergon.Google Scholar
Billenkamp, Michael 2008 Thomas Bernhard: Narrativik und poetologische Praxis. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley 1984 Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Seymour 1978 Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Tom 2009 “Joint Attention to Music.” British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (1): 5973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, Tom 2014 “Narrative and Character Formation.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (3): 303315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, Monika 2003 “Metanarrative and Metafictional Commentary: From Metadiscursivity to Metanarration and Metafiction.” Poetica: Zeitschrift für Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft 35 (1/2): 139.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry 2004 The Reasons of Love. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Freudenberg, Rachel 1995 “Fictions of Friendship in Twentieth-century German Literature: Mann’s ‘Doktor Faustus,’ Grass’s ‘Katz und Maus,’ Bernhard’s ‘Der Untergeher’ and ‘Wittgensteins Neffe,’ and Wolf’s ‘Nachdenken über Christa T.’” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Gignoux, , Claire, Anne 2010 “La maladie mortelle : Le neveu de Wittgenstein de Thomas Bernhard et À l’ami qui ne m’a pas sauvé la vie d’Hervé Guibert.” Romantic Review 101 (3): 395407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans, Höller 1993 Thomas Bernhard. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Kurt 2001 Aus Gesprächen mit Thomas Bernhard. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Honegger, Gitta 2001 Thomas Bernhard: The Making of an Austrian. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jusdanis, Gregory 2014 A Tremendous Thing: Friendship from the Iliad to the Internet. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kirchmayr, Raoul 2005 “‘Am Ende des Lebens’: Amicizia e scrittura in ‘Il nipote di Wittgenstein.’” aut aut 325: 110134.Google Scholar
Klebes, Martin 2006 Wittgenstein’s Novels. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Niko 2003 “Love as Valuing a Relationship.” Philosophical Review 112 (2): 135189.Google Scholar
Konzett, Matthias 1995 “Publikumsbeschimpfung: Thomas Bernhard’s Provocations of the Austrian Public Sphere.” German Quarterly 68 (3): 251270.Google Scholar
Lynch, Sandra 2005 Philosophy and Friendship. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Michael 2008 “Reflections on Comic Reconciliations: Ethics, Memory, and Anxious Happy Endings.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (1): 7787.Google Scholar
Mittelmayer, Manfred 2011 “Lächerlich, charakterlos, furchterregend. Zu Thomas Bernhards Rhetorik der Bezichtigung.” In Knape, Joachim and Kramer, Olaf (Eds.), Rhetorik und Sprachkunst bei Thomas Bernhard (pp. 2544). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Moran, Richard 2015 The Story of My Life: Narrative and Self-Understanding. The Aquinas Lecture. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Morneweg, Annelie 2004 Elemente des Komischen in der Autobiographie Thomas Bernhards. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander 2016 On Friendship. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie 1996 Wittgenstein’s Ladder. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pfleger, Alexandra 2009 Der erinnerte Freund: Das Thema der Freundschaft in der Gegenwartsliteratur. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul 1983–1985 Temps et récit, 1–3. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Savicky, Beth 2014 “Wittgenstein and Friendship.” Philosophical Investigations 37 (3): 185194.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Camillo 1980 Hommage Paul Wittgenstein. Vienna: Editions Freibord.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Camillo 1986 Wittgensteins Grössenwahn: Begegnungen mit Paul Wittgenstein. Vienna: Jungen und Volk.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Camillo 2013 Wittgensteins Freund: Eine Erinnerung. Ried im Innkreis: Verlag Hammerer.Google Scholar
Sharp, Ronald 1986 Friendship and Literature: Spirit and Form. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sorg, Bernhard 1977 Thomas Bernhard. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David 1999 “Love as a Moral Emotion.” Ethics 109 (2): 338374.Google Scholar
Weber, Albrecht 1981 “Wittgensteins Gestalt und Theorie und ihre Wirkung im Werk Thomas Bernhards.” Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur 25 (2): 86104.Google Scholar
Zangwill, Nick 2012 “Listening to Music Together.” British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (4): 379389.Google Scholar