Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:16:37.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The (logical) importance of not existing1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

R.  and
V. Routley
R.
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
V. Routley
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An Adequate theory of meaning and truth is semantically important. Such a theory necessarily includes in its analysis nonentities, items that do not exist. So what is semantically, and hence logically, important is bound to include nonentities. In virtue of the modifier ‘semantically“, the first premiss is analytic (what is semantically important may not be important), and it is comparatively uncontroversial. By contrast the second premise of the syllogism, which we want to stick to, is decidedly controversial. So too is the thesis (advanced in [2] and [3] and in Chisholm [15]) – which implies the inadequacy of classical logical theories – that there are a great many natural language statements, statements an adequate theory should be able to treat of, which cannot be analysed logically, and semantically, without the equivalent of an appeal to nonentities. Defence of the thesis has been somewhat piecemeal, taking the form that all the theories so far offered which try to dispense with nonentities break down or run into insuperable difficulties, difficulties which are readily surmounted given appropriate talk about nonentities. In what follows we shall outline more general sorts of argument for the thesis, designed to show that no theory which dispenses with nonentities as objects of discourse can do justice to the data.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 129 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Smart, J.J.C., ‘A Critique of Meinongian semantics’, paper presented at the Australasian Association of Logic Conference, Melbourne, 1977.Google Scholar
[2] R., and Routley, V., ‘Rehabilitating Meinong's theory of objects’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 27 (1973), 224–54.Google Scholar
[3] Routley, R., ‘Exploring Meinong's Jungle, I and II', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (forthcoming). An expanded version will appear as Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond, RSSS, Australian National University, 1979.Google Scholar
[4] Quine, W.V., From a Logical Point of View, Second edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1964).Google Scholar
[5] Routley, R., ‘Existence and identity in quantified modal logics’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 10 (1969), 113–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Parsons, T., ‘A prolegomenon to Meinongian semantics’, Journal of Philosophy, 71 (1974), 561–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Brady, R.T. and Routley, R., ‘Don't care was made to care’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 51 (1973), 211–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Parsons, T., ‘A Meinongian analysis of fictional objects’, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 1 (1975), 73–86.Google Scholar
[9] Meinong, A., Über Annahmen, Second edition, Barth, Leipzig, 1910.Google Scholar
[10] Thomason, R., ‘Indirect discourse is not quotational’, The Monist, 60 (1977), 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Routley, R. and Meyer, R.K., Relevant Logics and Their Rivals, RSSS, Australian National University, 1978.Google Scholar
[12] Smart, J.J.C., Philosophy and Scientific Realism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1963.Google Scholar
[13] SirHamilton, William, The Works of Thomas Reid, D.D., Eighth edition, James Thin, Edinburgh, 1845.Google Scholar
[14] R. and Routley, V., ‘Ideal objects on a Meinongian theory of universals’, Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy, vol. 5 Varna (1975), p. 581–84.Google Scholar
[15] Chisholm, R.M., ‘Beyond being and nonbeing’, Philosophical Studies, 24 (1973) 245–57; also in Jenseits von Sein and Nichtsein (edited R. Haller), Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Armstrong, D.M., Perception and The Physical World, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1961.Google Scholar
[17] Linsky, L., Referring, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1967.Google Scholar
[18] Moore, G.E., Philosophical Papers, Allen and Unwin, London, 1959.Google Scholar
[19] Kaplan, B.(ed.), The Inner World of Mental Illness, Harper and Row, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
[20] Huxley, A., The Doors of Perception, Penguin, London, 1959.Google Scholar
[21] Chisholm, R.M. (ed.), Realism and the Background to Phenomenology, Free Press, Illinois, 1960.Google Scholar