Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:58:09.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Concept of Ideology in Sartre: ‘Situatedness’ as an Epistemological and Anthropological Concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1968

Hermann Wein
Hermann Wein
Affiliation:
Göttingen University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The main sources of the style of contemporary philosophy, sources which run counter to the style of classical philosophy, come together in the intellectual development and works of Jean-Paul Sartre. In him can be seen the styles of Hegel, Kierkegaard, Marx, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and perhaps even of Wittgenstein. Sartre's L'être et le néant was one focal point of these influences. A re-evaluation of Marx is characteristic of his later works. Marx's philosophical theory is more than just a theory:

… it was not the idea which unsettled us; nor was it the condition of the worker, which we knew abstractly but which we had not experienced. No, it was the two joined together. It was—as we would have said then in our idealist jargon even as we were breaking with idealism—the Proletariat as the incarnation and vehicle of an idea.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , June 1968 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sartre, J.-P., Critique de la reason dialectique (Paris: 1960), p. 23Google Scholar. Eng. trans., Barnes, Hazel E.: Search for a Method (New York: Knopf, 1963), p. 18Google Scholar.

2 Tworczość (1957, no. 4).

3 Sartre, op. cit., p. 24; Barnes, p. 20.

4 Whitehead, A. N., Process and Reality (New York: 1929) p. xGoogle Scholar.

5 Cf. Claude, Lévi-Strauss, Anthropologie structurale (Paris: 1958)Google Scholar.

6 C. J. Friedrich's translation of Hegel's term ‘Wirklichkeit’, which plays a key role in Marx's philosophy.

7 Sartre, op. cit., p. 107; Barnes, p. 174.

8 Marx, , Die Frühschriften (Stuttgart: 1953) p. 339Google Scholar. Trans. The German Ideology (New York: International Publ., 1963) p. 197Google Scholar.

9 Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 731. Formula adopted by Husserl: cf. Broekman, Jan M., Phaenomenologie und Egologie, Phaenomenologica XII (The Hague: 1963)Google Scholar.

10 Kant, op. cit., B 709.

11 Schaff, Adam, Marx oder Sartre ? Versuch einer Philosophic des Menschen (Vienna: 1964)Google Scholar; see also his Marksizm i jednostka ludzka (Warsaw: 1965)Google Scholar and his A Philosophy of Man (New York, Monthly Review Press: 1963)Google Scholar.

12 Compare the concept ‘meta-anthropology’ in the still unpublished papers of Scheler.

13 Cf. Wein, H., Philosophie ah Erfahrungswissenschqft (The Hague: 1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Wittgenstein, , Philosophical Investigations (Oxford; Blackwell, 1958) 125Google Scholar.

15 Sartre, op. cit., p. 95; Barnes, pp. 150–1.

16 Sartre, op. cit., p. 110; Barnes, pp. 180–1.