Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:59:31.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Motor impairments, neurological signs, and developmental level in individuals with Angelman syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2004

Eva Beckung
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Suzanne Steffenburg
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Göteborg University, Sweden.
Mårten Kyllerman
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the character of motor dysfunction in individuals with Angelman syndrome (AS). Thirty-three children and adolescents (median age 6 years, range 18 months to 23 years) were consecutively investigated for learning disability, epilepsy, and motor dysfunction to detect suspected AS. Twenty-three individuals (13 males, 10 females; median age 5 years 6 months, range 21 months to 23 years) fulfilled international consensus criteria for AS. Clinical diagnosis was supported by a positive DNA methylation test in eleven participants. Ten participants (seven males, three females; median age six years, range 18 months to 13 years) did not comply with consensus criteria for AS and were regarded as a comparison group. There was no significant difference between the AS and the comparison group regarding age or developmental level. Median developmental quotient level was 26 months (range 8 to 63 months); median gross motor developmental level in participants with AS was 24 months (range 8 to 60 months); median fine motor developmental level was 15 months (range 6 to 60 months). Muscle strength, spasticity, tremor, and coactivation were assessed: distal lower limb spasticity, ataxic like gait, stiff lower limbs, and the presence of coactivation during locomotion were significantly more frequent in participants with AS than in the comparison group (p<0.05). Asymmetry of muscle strength and spasticity were frequent. Neurological abnormalities were insufficient for a diagnosis of cerebral palsy and impeded function less than immaturity in both AS groups. Risk of increasing impairment needs to be anticipated to prevent negative long-term effects of muscle imbalance and motor asymmetries in individuals with AS.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2004 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)