Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:39:54.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parsing profiles of temperamental reactivity and differential routes to delay of gratification: A person-based approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2018

Jennifer H. Suor ,
Melissa L. Sturge-Apple  and
Hannah R. Jones-Gordils
Jennifer H. Suor*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Melissa L. Sturge-Apple
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Hannah R. Jones-Gordils
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jennifer H. Suor, Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, 355 Meliora Hall, Rochester, NY 14627. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Informed by a developmental psychopathology perspective, the present study applied a person-based approach to examine whether associations between early sociocontextual experiences (e.g., socioeconomic factors and maternal discipline practices) and preschool-age children's delay of gratification vary across profiles of children's temperamental reactivity. In addition, the study examined the direct and mediating role of children's set shifting in associations with delay of gratification within each profile. The sample consisted of 160 socioeconomically and ethnically diverse mothers and their 5-year-old children drawn from a longitudinal study of mother–child relationships. Latent profile analyses identified three profiles of temperamental reactivity distinguished by sensitivity to reward and punishment and negative affectivity. Multigroup analysis revealed maternal sensitive discipline (observed during a parent–child compliance task) at age 3.5 predicted longer delay of gratification at age 5 in the punishment reactivity/negative affectivity group. Maternal inductive reasoning discipline at age 3.5 predicted longer delay in the low temperamental reactivity group. For children with the reward reactivity/negative affectivity profile, higher family income at age 3.5 predicted longer delay of gratification at age 5, which was mediated by children's set shifting. Findings underscore the utility of person-based approaches for delineating differential developmental routes toward children's delay of gratification.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 31 , Special Issue 1: The effect of maltreatment experiences on maltreating and dysfunctional parenting: A search for mechanisms , February 2019 , pp. 341 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21NR010857-01, and by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F31HD086941. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We are much appreciative of the mothers and children who participated in this project. We also thank the students and staff on the project, including Courtney Ball, Janise Carmichael, Michael Skibo, Jennifer Torres, and Caryn Stark.

References

Ahadi, S. A., Rothbart, M. K., & Ye, R. (1993). Children's temperament in the US and China: Similarities and differences. European Journal of Personality, 7, 359–378. doi:10.1002/per.2410070506.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. K., Hillier, A., Smith, R. M., Tivarus, M. E., & Beversdorf, D. Q. (2007). Beta-adrenergic modulation of cognitive flexibility during stress. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 468–478. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.468.Google Scholar
Arnsten, A. F. (2015). Stress weakens prefrontal networks: Molecular insults to higher cognition. Nature Neuroscience, 18, 1376–1385. doi:10.1038/nn.4087.Google Scholar
Ayduk, O., Mendoza-Denton, R., Mischel, W., Downey, G., Peake, P., & Rodriguez, M. L. (2000). Regulating the interpersonal self: Strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 776–792. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.776.Google Scholar
Ayduk, O., Zayas, V., Downey, G., Cole, A. B., Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2008). Rejection sensitivity and executive control: Joint predictors of borderline personality features. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 151–168. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.002.Google Scholar
Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Ridge, B. (1998). Interaction of temperamental resistance to control and restrictive parenting in the development of externalizing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 34, 982–995. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.982.Google Scholar
Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338–363. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.8.3.338.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (1997). Theory testing, effect size evaluation, and differential susceptibility to rearing influence: The case of mothering and attachment. Child Development, 68, 598–600. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb04221.x.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (2005). Differential susceptibility to rearing influence. In Ellis, B. J. & Bjorklund, D. F. (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 139–163). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Hsieh, K. H., & Crnic, K. (1998). Mothering, fathering, and infant negativity as antecedents of boys’ externalizing problems and inhibition at age 3 years: Differential susceptibility to rearing experience? Development and Psychopathology, 10, 301–319. doi:10.1017/S095457949800162X.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908. doi:10.1037/a0017376.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Woodworth, S., & Crnic, K. (1996). Troubled family interaction during toddlerhood. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 477–495. doi:10.1017/S0954579400007227.Google Scholar
Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319. doi:10.1017/S095457949700206X.Google Scholar
Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., & Whipple, N. (2010). From external regulation to self-regulation: Early parenting precursors of young children's executive functioning. Child Development, 81, 326–339. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01397.x.Google Scholar
Biederman, J., Rosenbaum, J. F., Hirshfeld, D. R., Faraone, S. V., Bolduc, E. A., Gersten, M., … Reznick, J. S. (1990). Psychiatric correlates of behavioral inhibition in young children of parents with and without psychiatric disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 21–26. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810130023004.Google Scholar
Blair, C., Berry, D. J., & FLP Investigators. (2017). Moderate within-person variability in cortisol is related to executive function in early childhood. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 81, 88–95. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.03.026.Google Scholar
Blair, C., Granger, D. A., Willoughby, M., Mills-Koonce, R., Cox, M., Greenberg, M. T., … Fortunato, C. K. (2011). Salivary cortisol mediates effects of poverty and parenting on executive functions in early childhood. Child Development, 82, 1970–1984. doi:10.1037/a0026472.Google Scholar
Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2012). Individual development and evolution: Experiential canalization of self-regulation. Developmental Psychology, 48, 647–657. doi:10.1037/a0026472.Google Scholar
Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 271–301. doi:10.1017/S09545794050145.Google Scholar
Bugental, D. B. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 187–209. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.187.Google Scholar
Bugental, D. B., & Goodnow, J. G. (1998). Socialization processes. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, 5th ed., pp. 389–462). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M. (2003). Executive function in context: Development, measurement, theory, and experience. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68, 138–151. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2003.06803012.x.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M. (2005). Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 595–616. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_3.Google Scholar
Choe, D. E., Olson, S. L., & Sameroff, A. J. (2013). Effects of early maternal distress and parenting on the development of children's self-regulation and externalizing behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 437–453. doi:10.1017/S0954579412001162.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D. (1993). Developmental psychopathology: Reactions, reflections, projections. Developmental Review, 13, 471–502. doi:10.1006/drev.1993.1021.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996). Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 597–600. doi:10.1017/S0954579400007318.Google Scholar
Cipriano, E. A., & Stifter, C. A. (2010). Predicting preschool effortful control from toddler temperament and parenting behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 221–230. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2010.02.004.Google Scholar
Conway, A., & Stifter, C. A. (2012). Longitudinal antecedents of executive function in preschoolers. Child Development, 83, 1022–1036. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01756.x.Google Scholar
Davis, R. N., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). Cognitive inflexibility among ruminators and nonruminators. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 699–711. doi:10.1023/a:100559141240.Google Scholar
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1994). Temperament and attention: Orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1128–1139. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1128.Google Scholar
Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (2006). Motivation, self-regulation, and self-organization. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 502–532). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470939390.ch12.Google Scholar
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., Gendler, T. S., & Gross, J. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 35–55. doi:10.1177/1745691615623247.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., & Steinberg, L. (2015). Unpacking self-control. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 32–37. doi:10.1111/cdep.12107.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Edwards, A., Spinrad, T. L., Sallquist, J., Eggum, N. D., & Reiser, M. (2013). Are effortful and reactive control unique constructs in young children? Developmental Psychology, 49, 2082–2094. doi:10.1037/a0031745.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., & Vaughan, J. (2007). Effortful control and its socioemotional consequences. In Gross, J. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 287–306). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Reiser, M., Cumberland, A., Shepard, S. A., … Thompson, M. (2004). The relations of effortful control and impulsivity to children's resiliency and adjustment. Child Development, 75, 25–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00652.x.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Fabes, R. A., Smith, C. L., Reiser, M., Shepard, S. A., … Cumberland, A. J. (2003). The relations of effortful control and ego control to children's resiliency and social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 39, 761–776. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.761.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Spinrad, T. L., Cumberland, A., Liew, J., Reiser, M., … Losoya, S. H. (2009). Longitudinal relations of children's effortful control, impulsivity, and negative emotionality to their externalizing, internalizing, and co-occurring behavior problems. Developmental Psychology, 45, 988–1008. doi:10.1037/a0016213.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., Spinrad, T. L., Valiente, C., Fabes, R. A., & Liew, J. (2005). Relations among positive parenting, children's effortful control, and externalizing problems: A three-wave longitudinal study. Child Development, 76, 1055–1071. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00897.x.Google Scholar
Evans, G. W. (2003). A multimethodological analysis of cumulative risk and allostatic load among rural children. Developmental Psychology, 39, 924–933. doi:10.1037/0012 1649.39.5.924.Google Scholar
Evans, G. W., & English, K. (2002). The environment of poverty: Multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment. Child Development, 73, 1238–1248. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00469.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.Google Scholar
Francis, L. A., & Susman, E. J. (2009). Self-regulation and rapid weight gain in children from age 3 to 12 years. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 163, 297–302. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.579.Google Scholar
Frankenhuis, W. E., Panchanathan, K., & Nettle, D. (2016). Cognition in harsh and unpredictable environments. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 76–80. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.011.Google Scholar
Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Bodin, S. D., Dane, H. E., Barry, C. T., & Loney, B. R. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits and developmental pathways to severe conduct problems. Developmental Psychology, 39, 246–260. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.2.246.Google Scholar
Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10, 483–527. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(95)90024-1.Google Scholar
Gagnon, S. A., & Wagner, A. D. (2016). Acute stress and episodic memory retrieval: Neurobiological mechanisms and behavioral consequences. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369, 55–75. doi:10.1111/nyas.12996.Google Scholar
Gallimore, R., Weiss, L. B., & Finney, R. (1974). Cultural differences in delay of gratification: A problem of behavior classification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 72–80. doi:10.1037/h0036606.Google Scholar
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 31–60. doi:10.1037/0033 2909.134.1.31.Google Scholar
Goodnight, J. A., Bates, J. E., Newman, J. P., Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (2006). The interactive influences of friend deviance and reward dominance on the development of externalizing behavior during middle adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 573–583. doi:10.1007/s10802-006-9036-9.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In Strelau, J. & Angleitner, A. (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 105–128). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2010). Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development, 81, 687–709. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01426.x.Google Scholar
Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child's internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.4.Google Scholar
Hagenaars, J. A., & McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millenium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360.Google Scholar
Henderson, H. A., & Wachs, T. D. (2007). Temperament theory and the study of cognition-emotion interactions across development. Developmental Review, 27, 396–427. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.06.004.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. (1983). Affective and cognitive processes in moral internalization: An information processing approach. In Higgins, E. T., Ruble, D., & Hartup, W. (Eds.), Social cognition and social development: A sociocultural perspective (pp. 236–274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houck, G. M., & LeCuyer-Maus, E. A. (2004). Maternal limit setting during toddlerhood, delay of gratification, and behavior problems at age five. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25, 28–46. doi:10.1002/imhj.10083.Google Scholar
Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 302–317. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x.Google Scholar
Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. N. (2013). Rational snacking: Young children's decision-making on the marshmallow task is moderated by beliefs about environmental reliability. Cognition, 126, 109–114. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G. (1995). Children's temperament, mothers’ discipline, and security of attachment: Multiple pathways to emerging internalization. Child Development, 66, 597–615. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00892.x.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G. (1997). Multiple pathways to conscience for children with different temperaments: From toddlerhood to age 5. Developmental Psychology, 33, 228–240. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.2.228.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., Aksan, N., & Joy, M. E. (2007). Children's fearfulness as a moderator of parenting in early socialization: Two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 43, 222–237. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.222.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36, 220–232. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.220.Google Scholar
Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 199–214. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.2.199.Google Scholar
Kuczynski, L., Marshall, S., & Schell, K. (1998). Value socialization in a bi-directional context. In Grusec, J. E. & Kuczynski, L. (Eds.), Parenting and children's internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 23–52). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Laredo, S. A., Steinman, M. Q., Robles, C. F., Ferrer, E., Ragen, B. J., & Trainor, B. C. (2015). Effects of defeat stress on behavioral flexibility in males and females: Modulation by the mu-opioid receptor. European Journal of Neuroscience, 41, 434–441. doi:10.1111/ejn.12824.Google Scholar
Lee, W. S., & Carlson, S. M. (2015). Knowing when to be “rational”: Flexible economic decision making and executive function in preschool children. Child Development, 86, 1434–1448. doi:10.1111/cdev.12401.Google Scholar
Lemery, K. S., Essex, M. J., & Smider, N. A. (2002). Revealing the relation between temperament and behavior problem symptoms by eliminating measurement confounding: Expert ratings and factor analyses. Child Development, 73, 867–882. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00444.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., Moran, L., Zalewski, M., Ruberry, E., Kiff, C., & Thompson, S. (2015). Relations of growth in effortful control to family income, cumulative risk, and adjustment in preschool-age children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 705–720. doi:10.1007/s10802-014-9941-2.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., West, S. G., & Sandler, I. N. (1998). Temperament as a predictor of symptomatology in children: Addressing contamination of measures. Child Development, 69, 164–181. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06141.x.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., Wolchik, S. A., Sandler, I. N., & West, S. G. (2000). The additive and interactive effects of parenting and temperament in predicting adjustment problems of children of divorce. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 232–244. doi:10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_9.Google Scholar
Leve, L. D., Kim, H. K., & Pears, K. C. (2005). Childhood temperament and family environment as predictors of internalizing and externalizing trajectories from ages 5 to 17. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 505–520. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-6734-7.Google Scholar
Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.Google Scholar
Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.767.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Fritz, M. S., Williams, J., & Lockwood, C. M. (2007). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 384–389. doi:10.3758/BF03193007.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. doi:10.1023/A:1026595011371.Google Scholar
Magen, E., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Harnessing the need for immediate gratification: Cognitive reconstrual modulates the reward value of temptations. Emotion, 7, 415–428. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.415.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Ludtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 191–225. doi:10.1080/10705510902751010.Google Scholar
Matton, A., Goossens, L., Braet, C., & Vervaet, M. (2013). Punishment and reward sensitivity: Are naturally occurring clusters in these traits related to eating and weight problems in adolescents? European Eating Disorders Review, 21, 184–194. doi:10.1002/erv.2226.Google Scholar
McEwen, B. S., & Sapolsky, R. M. (1995). Stress and cognitive function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 205–216. doi:10.1016/0959-4388(95)80028-X.Google Scholar
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2004). Finite mixture models. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Melby, J. N., & Conger, R. D. (2001). The Iowa family interaction rating scales: Instrument summary. In Kerig, P. K. & Lindahl, K. M. (Eds.), Family observational coding systems: Resources for systemic research (pp. 33–58). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). A latent profile analysis of the Five-Factor Model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 915–919. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.022.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3.Google Scholar
Michaelson, L., de la Vega, A., Chatham, C. H., & Munakata, Y. (2013). Delaying gratification depends on social trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00355.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1958). Preference for delayed reinforcement: An experimental study of a cultural observation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 57–61. doi:10.1037/h0041895.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., … Shoda, Y. (2011).”Willpower” over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 252–256. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq081.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., & Baker, N. (1975). Cognitive appraisals and transformations in delay behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 254–261. doi:10.1037/h0076272.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1970). Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 329–337. doi:10.1037/h0029815.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933–938. doi:10.1126/science.2658056.Google Scholar
Moore, B., Mischel, W., & Zeiss, A. (1976). Comparative effects of the reward stimulus and its cognitive representation in voluntary delay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 419–424. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.419.Google Scholar
Moran, L., Lengua, L. J., Zalewski, M., Ruberry, E., Klein, M., Thompson, S., & Kiff, C. (2017). Variable-and person-centered approaches to examining temperament vulnerability and resilience to the effects of contextual risk. Journal of Research in Personality, 67, 61–74. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.03.003.Google Scholar
Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In Kaplan, D. (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 346–369). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Muthén, B. (2006). Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction, 101, 6–16. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01583.x.Google Scholar
Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x.Google Scholar
Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, I. (2008). Growth mixture modeling: Analysis with non-Gaussian random effects. In Fitzmaurice, G., Davidian, M., Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (Eds.), Longitudinal data analysis (pp. 143–165). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Author.Google Scholar
Neuenschwander, R., & Blair, C. (2017). Zooming in on children’s behavior during delay of gratification: Disentangling impulsigenic and volitional processes underlying self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 154, 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.09.007Google Scholar
Nigg, J. T. (2017). Annual Research Review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 361–383. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12675.Google Scholar
Noble, K. G., McCandliss, B. D., & Farah, M. J. (2007). Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Developmental Science, 10, 464–480. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00600.x.Google Scholar
O'Brien, B. S., Frick, P. J., & Lyman, R. D. (1994). Reward dominance among children with disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 131–145. doi:10.1007/BF02232724.Google Scholar
Olson, S. L., Bates, J. E., & Bayles, K. (1990). Early antecedents of childhood impulsivity: The role of parent-child interaction, cognitive competence, and temperament. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 317–334. doi:10.1007/BF00916568.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. D., & Gray, J. A. (1999). The neuroscience of personality. In John, O. P. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 277–299). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Plessow, F., Fischer, R., Kirschbaum, C., & Goschke, T. (2011). Inflexibly focused under stress: Acute psychosocial stress increases shielding of action goals at the expense of reduced cognitive flexibility with increasing time lag to the stressor. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3218–3227. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00024.Google Scholar
Price-Williams, D. R., & Ramirez, M. III. (1974). Ethnic differences in delay of gratification. Journal of Social Psychology, 93, 23–30. doi:10.1080/00224545.1974.9923126.Google Scholar
Putnam, S. P., & Rothbart, M. K. (2006). Development of short and very short forms of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 102–112. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_09.Google Scholar
Putnam, S. P., & Stifter, C. A. (2005). Behavioral approach–inhibition in toddlers: Prediction from infancy, positive and negative affective components, and relations with behavior problems. Child Development, 76, 212–226. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00840.x.Google Scholar
Raver, C. C., Blair, C., & Willoughby, M. (2013). Poverty as a predictor of 4-year-olds’ executive function: New perspectives on models of differential susceptibility. Developmental Psychology, 49, 292–304. doi:10.1037/a0028343.Google Scholar
Raver, C. C., Jones, S. M., Li-Grining, C., Zhai, F., Bub, K., & Pressler, E. (2011). CSRP's impact on low-income preschoolers’ preacademic skills: Self-regulation as a mediating mechanism. Child Development, 82, 362–378. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01561.x.Google Scholar
Raver, C. C., & Leadbeater, B. J. (1995). Factors influencing joint attention between socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescent mothers and their infants. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 251–271). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Razza, R. A., & Raymond, K. (2013). Associations among maternal behavior, delay of gratification, and school readiness across the early childhood years. Social Development, 22, 180–196. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00665.x.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, M. L., Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1989). Cognitive person variables in the delay of gratification of older children at risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 358–367. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.358.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Ahadi, S. (1994). Temperament and the development of personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 55–66. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.55.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey, K. L., & Fisher, P. (2001). Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: The Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Child Development, 72, 1394–1408. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00355.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 105–176). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In Eisenberg, N., Damon, W., & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3., pp. 99–166). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Derryberry, D., & Posner, M. I. (1994). A psychobiological approach to the development of temperament. In Bates, J. E. & Wachs, T. D. (Eds.), Temperament: Individual differences at the interface of biology and behavior (pp. 83–116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x.Google Scholar
Sanson, A., & Rothbart, M. K. (1995). Child temperament and parenting. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.). Handbook of parenting (Vol. 4., pp. 299–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136.Google Scholar
Seeyave, D. M., Coleman, S., Appugliese, D., Corwyn, R. F., Bradley, R. H., Davidson, N. S., … Lumeng, J. C. (2009). Ability to delay gratification at age 4 years and risk of overweight at age 11 years. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 163, 303–308. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.12.Google Scholar
Sethi, A., Mischel, W., Aber, J. L., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (2000). The role of strategic attention deployment in development of self-regulation: Predicting preschoolers’ delay of gratification from mother–toddler interactions. Developmental Psychology, 36, 767–777. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.6.767.Google Scholar
Stifter, C. A., Putnam, S., & Jahromi, L. (2008). Exuberant and inhibited toddlers: Stability of temperament and risk for problem behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 401–421. doi:10.1017/S0954579408000199.Google Scholar
Sturge-Apple, M. L., Davies, P. T., Cicchetti, D., Hentges, R. F., & Coe, J. L. (2017). Family instability and children's effortful control in the context of poverty: Sometimes a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 685–696. doi:10.1017/S0954579416000407.Google Scholar
Sturge-Apple, M. L., Suor, J. H., Davies, P. T., Cicchetti, D., Skibo, M. A., & Rogosch, F. A. (2016). Vagal tone and children's delay of gratification: Differential sensitivity in resource-poor and resource-rich environments. Psychological Science, 27, 885–893. doi:10.1177/0956797616640269.Google Scholar
Sulik, M. J., Daneri, M. P., Pintar, A. I., & Blair, C. (2016). Self-regulation in early childhood: Theory and measurement. In Balter, L. & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (3rd ed., pp. 123–140). New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Suor, J. H., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Davies, P. T., & Cicchetti, D. (2017). A life history approach to delineating how harsh environments and hawk temperament traits differentially shape children's problem-solving skills. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 902–909. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12718.Google Scholar
Taylor, J., Reeves, M., James, L., & Bobadilla, L. (2006). Disinhibitory trait profile and its relation to cluster B personality disorder features and substance use problems. European Journal of Personality, 20, 271–284. doi:10.1002/per.585.Google Scholar
Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x.Google Scholar
United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2012, January 26). 2012 Department of Health and Human Services poverty guidelines. Federal Register, 77, 4034–4035.Google Scholar
United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2013, January 24). 2013 Department of Health and Human Services poverty guidelines. Federal Register, 78, 5182–5183.Google Scholar
Wachs, T. D., & Gruen, G. (1982). Early experience and human development. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wachs, T. D., Pollitt, E., Cueto, S., & Jacoby, E. (2004). Structure and cross-contextual stability of neonatal temperament. Infant Behavior and Development, 27, 382–396. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2004.02.001.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. C., Lengua, L. J., Tininenko, J., Taylor, A., & Trancik, A. (2009). Physiological profiles during delay of gratification: Associations with emotionality, self-regulation, and adjustment problems. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 780–790. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2009.05.002.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. S., & Matheny, A. P. (1983). Assessment of temperament in infant twins. Developmental Psychology, 19, 172–183. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.19.2.172.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Farver, J. A. M., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Temperament, harsh and indulgent parenting, and Chinese children's proactive and reactive aggression. Child Development, 80, 244–258. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01257.x.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D. (2006). The Dimensional Change Card Sort: A method of assessing executive function in children. Nature Protocols, 1, 297–301. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.46.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., Frye, D., & Rapus, T. (1996). An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them. Cognitive Development, 11, 37–63. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90027-1.Google Scholar
Zytkoskee, A., Strickland, B. R., & Watson, J. (1971). Delay of gratification and internal versus external control among adolescents of low socioeconomic status. Developmental Psychology, 4, 93–98. doi:10.1037/h0030376.Google Scholar