Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:29:44.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Logical, analogical, and psychological reasoning in autism: A test of the Cosmides theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2009

Fiona J. Scott  and
Simon Baron-Cohen
Fiona J. Scott*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, University of London
Simon Baron-Cohen
Affiliation:
Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Cambridge
*
Fiona J. Scott, Department of Psychology, University of Greenwich, Southwood Site, Avery Hill Road, Eltham, London SE9 2HB.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An important regulatory process in the development of behavior is cognition. However, cognition as a blanket term is far too broad to be useful. Rather, specific types of cognition need to be examined separately. One proposal is that one type of human reasoning evolved in a social context, to solve social problems. Here, we report two experiments that use autism to test a prediction from that theory: that social intelligence should be independent of nonsocial intelligence. Autism was chosen because deficits in social reasoning (“theory of mind”) are well known. The question we tested was whether their theory of mind deficit was dissociable from abstract and relational reasoning ability. In particular, we expected that the abnormalities in the behavioral development of children with autism would be regulated by abnormalities in theory of mind reasoning rather than other forms of reasoning. Children with autism and matched controls were given tests of abstracting reasoning, which did not involve mental state understanding. Results showed that children with autism performed comparably to the control groups, both on a test of transitive inferential reasoning and on a test of analogical reasoning. These results lend support to the specificity of the theory of mind hypothesis for autism and to Cosmides' theory of the evolution of social intelligence. They also show that cognition as a regulatory process in development needs to be examined in highly specific ways.

Type
Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 8 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Regulatory Process , Winter 1996 , pp. 235 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S. (1990). Autism: A specific cognitive disorder of ‘mindblindness.’ International Review of Psychiatry, 2, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1994). How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mindreading. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive (Current Psychology of Cognition), 13, 513–552.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition, 21, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. (1993). Understanding other minds; Perspectives from autism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1983). Test for reception of grammar (TROG). Abingdon, UK: Medical Research Council, Chapel Press.Google Scholar
Brothers, L. (1990). The social brain: A project for integrating primate behaviour and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts in Neuroscience, 1, 27–51.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E., & Trabasso, T. (1971). Transitive inferences and memory in young children. Nature, 232, 456–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (Eds.). (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charman, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1992). Understanding drawings and beliefs: A further test of the metarepresentation theory of autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charman, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (in press). Understanding models, photos, and beliefs: A test of the modulatory thesis of metarepresentation. Cognitive Development.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Folstein, S. E., & Rutter, M. L. (1988). Autism: Familial aggregation and genetic implications. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frith, U., & Happe, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond the “theory of mind.” Cognition, 50, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goswami, U., & Brown, A. L. (1989). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition, 35, 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, N. K. (1976). The social function of intellect. In Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A. (Eds.), Growing pains in ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jolly, A. (1966). Lemur social behaviour and primate intelligence. Science, 153, 501–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., Bellugi, U., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Is there a social module? Language, face-processing, and theory of mind in Williams Syndrome and autism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leekam, S., & Perner, J. (1991). Does the autistic child have a meta-representational deficit? Cognition, 41, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretence and representation: The origins of theory of mind. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1991). The theory of mind impairment in autism: Evidence for a modular mechanism of development? In Whiten, A. (Ed.), Natural theories of mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1994). Pretending and believing: Issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition, 50, 211–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, A. M., & Roth, D. (1993). What autism teaches us about metarepresentation. In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Understanding other minds; Perspectives from autism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. & Thaiss, L. (1992). Domain specificity in conceptual development: Neuropsychological evidence from autism. Cognition, 43, 225–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perner, J. (1993). The theory of mind deficit in autism: Rethinking the metarepresentation theory. In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. London: Penguin Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a “theory of mind”? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M. (1978). Language disorder and infantile autism. In Rutter, M. & Schopler, E. (Eds.), Autism: A reappraisal of concepts and treatments. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1983). An islet of ability in autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 613–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1993). Why do autistic individuals show superior performance on the block design test? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 1351–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed