Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:47:54.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of deviant peers on the development of boys' disruptive and delinquent behavior: A temporal analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2009

Kate Keenan ,
Rolf Loeber ,
Quanwu Zhang ,
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber  and
Welmoet B. van Kammen
Kate Keenan
Affiliation:
Pritzker School of Medicine
Rolf Loeber*
Affiliation:
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic
Quanwu Zhang
Affiliation:
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber
Affiliation:
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic
Welmoet B. van Kammen
Affiliation:
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic
*
Rolf Loeber, Ph.D., Life History Studies, 3811 O'Hara Street, 302 Iroquois Building, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concurrent and predictive influence of deviant peers on boys' disruptive and delinquent behavior was examined in a community sample of fourth- and seventh-grade boys, who were followed-up over six data waves. Analyses were conducted separately for three different types of behavior problems: authority conflict, covert, and overt disruptive behavior. Consistent with the existing literature, concurrent relations between peers' and boys' disruptive behavior were expected to be significant. A more informative test, however, was whether exposure to deviant peers resulted in boys' subsequent initiation of disruptive behavior. Although peer influences were expected in the predictive analyses, the relations were hypothesized to differ by type of behavior. The potential moderating effects of hyperactivity and poor parenting practices were also examined to test the hypothesis that boys who are already at risk for behavior problems will be more susceptible to deviant peer influence. Results supported the significant concurrent and predictive relation between exposure to deviant peers and boys' engagement in disruptive and delinquent behavior. There were no significant moderating effects of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or parenting practices on peer influence.

Type
Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 7 , Issue 4: Developmental Processes in Peer Relations and Psychopathology , Fall 1995 , pp. 715 - 726
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
Biederman, J., Newcorn, J., & Sprich, S. (1991). Comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with conduct, depressive, anxiety, and other disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 564–577.Google Scholar
Buikhuisen, W., & Mednick, S. A. (1988). The need for an integrative approach in criminology. In Buikhuisen, W. & Mednick, S. A. (Eds.), Explaining criminal behavior. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D. (1993). Developmental psychopathology: Reactions, reflections, projections. Developmental Review, 13, 471–502.Google Scholar
Costello, A. J., Edelbrock, C. S., Dulcan, M. K., Kalas, R., & Klaric, S. H. (1984). Report on the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC). Unpublished manuscript. Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
DiLalla, L. F., Mitchell, C. M., Arthur, M. W., & Pagliocca, P. M. (1988). Aggression and delinquency: Family and environmental factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17(3), 233–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Emler, N., Reicher, S., & Ross, A. (1987). The social context of delinquent conduct. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28(1), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gittelman, R., Mannuzza, S., Shenker, R., & Bonagura, N. (1985). Hyperactive boys almost grown up. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 937–947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henggeler, S. W. (1991). Multidimensional causal models of delinquent behavior and their implications for treatment. In Cohen, R. & Siegel, A. W. (Eds.), Context and development (pp. 211–231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. P. (1993). Exploring the direct and indirect family effects of adolescent drug use. The Journal of Drug Issues, 25(3), 535–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lahey, B. B., Hart, E. L., Pliszka, S., Applegate, B. A., McBurnett, K. (1993). Neurophysiological correlates of conduct disorder: A rationale and review of research. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeber, R. (1988). Natural histories of conduct problems, delinquency, and associated substance use. In Lahey, B. & Kazdin, A. (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology, volume. 11 (pp. 73–115). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & van Kammen, W. B. (1994). Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems during childhood and adolescence. Unpublished manuscript. University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., Keenan, K., & Zhang, Q. (1994). Boys'experimentation and persistence in developmental pathways toward serious delinquency. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In Tonry, M. & Morris, N. (Eds.), Crime and justice (pp. 29–149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., van Kammen, V., & Farrington, D. (1989). Development of a new measure of self-reported antisocial behavior in young children: Prevalence and reliability. In Klein, M. W. (Ed.), Self-report methodology in criminologic research (pp. 203–225). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., van Kammen, V., & Farrington, D. (1991). Initiation, escalation and desistance in juvenile offending and their correlates. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 36–82.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., Wung, P., Keenan, K., Giroux, B., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., van Kammen, W., & Maughan, B. (1993). Developmental pathways in disruptive child behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 103–133.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. (1990). Juvenile delinquency and attention deficit disorder: Boys developmental trajectories from age 13 to age 15. Child Development, 61, 893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental typology. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701.Google Scholar
Pabon, E., Rodriguez, O., & Gurin, G. (1992). Clarifying peer relations and delinquency. Youth & Society, 24(2), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. E. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. E. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1984). The correlation of family management practices and delinquency. Child Development, 55, 1299–1307.Google Scholar
Reiss, A. J., & Farrington, D. P. (1991). Advancing knowledge about co-offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 360–395.Google Scholar
Simons, R. L., Conger, R. D., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1988). A multistage social learning model of the influences of family and peers upon adolescent substance use. The Journal of Drug Issues, 18(3), 293–316.Google Scholar
Simons, R. L., Whitbeck, L. B., Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (1991). Parenting factors, social skills, and value commitments as precursors to school failure, involvement with deviant peers, and delinquent behavior. Journal of Youth and A dolescence, 20(6), 645–664.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (1986). Latchkey children and susceptibility to peer pressure: An ecological analysis. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar