Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T21:58:25.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evocative gene–environment correlation in the mother–child relationship: A twin study of interpersonal processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Ashlea M. Klahr ,
Katherine M. Thomas ,
Christopher J. Hopwood ,
Kelly L. Klump  and
S. Alexandra Burt
Ashlea M. Klahr
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Katherine M. Thomas
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Christopher J. Hopwood
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Kelly L. Klump
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
S. Alexandra Burt*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Alex Burt, Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 107D Psychology Building, East Lansing, MI 48824; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The behavior genetic literature suggests that genetically influenced characteristics of the child elicit specific behaviors from the parent. However, little is known about the processes by which genetically influenced child characteristics evoke parental responses. Interpersonal theory provides a useful framework for identifying reciprocal behavioral processes between children and mothers. The theory posits that, at any given moment, interpersonal behavior varies along the orthogonal dimensions of warmth and control and that the interpersonal behavior of one individual tends to elicit corresponding or contrasting behavior from the other (i.e., warmth elicits warmth, whereas control elicits submission). The current study thus examined these dimensions of interpersonal behavior as they relate to the parent–child relationship in 546 twin families. A computer joystick was used to rate videos of mother–child interactions in real time, yielding information on mother and child levels of warmth and control throughout the interaction. Analyses indicated that maternal control, but not maternal warmth, was influenced by evocative gene–environment correlational processes, such that genetic influences on maternal control and child control were largely overlapping. Moreover, these common genetic influences were present both cross-sectionally and over the course of the interaction. Such findings not only confirm the presence of evocative gene–environment correlational processes in the mother–child relationship but also illuminate at least one of the specific interpersonal behaviors that underlie this evocative process.

Type
Special Section Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 25 , Issue 1: Gene–Environment Correlation in Developmental Psychopathology , February 2013 , pp. 105 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anchin, J. C., & Pincus, A. L. (2010). Evidence-based interpersonal psychotherapy with personality disorders: Theory, components, and strategies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. E., Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1986). Mothers' interactions with normal and conduct-disordered boys: Who affects whom? Developmental Psychology, 22, 604.Google Scholar
Antonucci, T. C., & Mikus, K. (1988). The power of parenthood: Personality and attitudinal changes during the transition to parenthood. In Michaels, G. Y. & Goldberg, W. A. (Eds.), The transition to parenthood: Current theory and research (pp. 62–84): New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, L. A., Barton, M., & Raine, A. (2002). The Southern California Twin Register at the University of Southern California. Twin Research, 5, 456–459.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1–103.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1973). The development of instrumental competence through socialization. In Pick, A. D. (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium of Child Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 3–46). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., & Jaffee, S. R. (2006). The multiple determinants of parenting Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 3. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (2nd ed., pp. 38–85). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boker, S. M., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Coupled dynamics and mutually adaptive context. In Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Card, N. A. (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614.Google Scholar
Burt, S. A. (2009). Are there meaningful etiological differences within antisocial behavior? Results of a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, S. A., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. (2003). Parent–child conflict and the comorbidity among childhood externalizing disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 505–513.Google Scholar
Burt, S. A., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). How are parent–child conflict and childhood externalizing symptoms related over time? Results from a genetically informative cross-lagged study. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 145–165.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. E., & Barkley, R. A. (1979). The interactions of normal and hyperactive children with their mothers in free play and structured tasks. Child Development, 50, 217–224.Google Scholar
Deater-Deckard, K., & O'Connor, T. G. (2000). Parent–child mutuality in early childhood: Two behavioral genetic studies. Developmental Psychology, 36, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deater-Deckard, K., Pylas, M., & Petrill, S. A. (1997). The Parent–Child Interaction System (PARCHISY). London: Institute of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., & Bullock, B. M. (2004). Premature adolescent autonomy: Parent disengagement and deviant peer process in the amplification of problem behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 515–530.Google Scholar
Dix, T., & Meunier, L. N. (2009). Depressive symptoms and parenting competence: An analysis of 13 regulatory processes. Developmental Review, 29, 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (2003). A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 39, 349.Google Scholar
Eley, T. C., Napolitano, M., Lau, J. Y. F., & Gregory, A. M. (2010). Does childhood anxiety evoke maternal control? A genetically informed study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 772–779.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M. E., Button, T. M. M., Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., & Hetherington, E. M. (2007). Parenting and adolescent antisocial behavior and depression: Evidence of Genotype × Parenting Environment interaction. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ge, X., Conger, R. D., Cadoret, R. J., Neiderhiser, J. M., Yates, W., Troughton, E., et al. (1996). The developmental interface between nature and nurture: A mutual influence model of child antisocial behavior and parent behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32, 574–589.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, H. H., Lemery, K. S., Buss, K. A., & Campos, J. J. (1999). Genetic analyses of focal aspects of infant temperament. Developmental Psychology, 35, 972–985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harlaar, N., Santtila, P., Björklund, J., Alanko, K., Jern, P., Varjonen, M., et al. (2008). Retrospective reports of parental physical affection and parenting style: A study of Finnish twins. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 605–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, D. A., McStephen, M., Levy, F., & Pearsall-Jones, J. (2002). Recruitment and attrition in twin register studies of childhood behavior: The example of the Australian twin ADHD project. Twin Research, 5, 324–328.Google Scholar
Herndon, R. W., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Genetic and environmental influences on adolescents' perceptions of current family environment. Behavior Genetics, 35, 373–380.Google Scholar
Hettema, J., Neale, M., & Kendler, K. (1995). Physical similarity and the equal-environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric disorders. Behavior Genetics, 25, 327–335.Google Scholar
Huijts, T., Kraaykamp, G., & Subramanian, S. V. (2011). Childlessness and psychological well-being in context: A multilevel study on 24 European countries. European Sociological Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/esr/jcr037Google Scholar
Jaffee, S. R., Belsky, J., Harrington, H., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2006). When parents have a history of conduct disorder: How is the caregiving environment affected? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 309–319.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (1996). Parenting: A genetic–epidemiologic perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 11–20.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Neale, M. C., Kessler, R. C., Heath, A. C., & Eaves, L. J. (1993). A test of the equal-environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric illness. Behavior Genetics, 23, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S., Sham, P. C., & MacLean, C. J. (1997). The determinants of parenting: An epidemiological, multi-informant, retrospective study. Psychological Medicine, 27, 549–563.Google Scholar
Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Klahr, A. M., & Burt, S. A. (2012). Elucidating the origins of individual differences in parental behavior: A meta-analysis of the genetic and environmental etiology of parenting. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Klahr, A. M., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G., & Burt, S. A. (2011). The association between parent–child conflict and adolescent conduct problems over time: Results from a longitudinal adoption study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 46–56.Google Scholar
Klahr, A. M., Rueter, M., McGue, M., Iacono, W., & Burt, S. A. (2011). The relationship between parent–child conflict and adolescent antisocial behavior: Confirming shared environmental mediation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 683–694.Google Scholar
Klump, K. L., & Burt, S. A. (2006). The Michigan State University Twin Registry (MSUTR): Genetic, environmental and neurobiological influences on behavior across development. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 971–977.Google Scholar
Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Oxford: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, P., Ganiban, J., Neiderhiser, J. M., Pedersen, N. L., Hansson, K., Cederblad, M., et al. (2003). Remembered parental bonding in adult twins: Genetic and environmental influences. Behavior Genetics, 33, 397–408.Google Scholar
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lynch, S. K., Turkheimer, E., D'Onofrio, B. M., Mendle, J., Emery, R. E., Slutske, W. S., et al. (2006). A genetically informed study of the association between harsh punishment and offspring behavioral problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 190–198.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In Mussen, P. H. & Hetherington, E. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Maestripieri, D. (1999). The biology of human parenting: Insights from nonhuman primates. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 411–422.Google Scholar
Markey, P., Lowmaster, S., & Eichler, W. (2010). A real-time assessment of interpersonal complementarity. Personal Relationships, 17, 13–25.Google Scholar
Markey, P. M., Markey, C. N., & Tinsley, B. (2005). Applying the interpersonal circumplex to children's behavior: Parent–child interactions and risk behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 549–559.Google Scholar
McGue, M., & Bouchard, T. J. (1984). Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behavior Genetics, 14, 325–343.Google Scholar
McLeod, B. D., Wood, J. J., & Weisz, J. R. (2007). Examining the association between parenting and childhood anxiety: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 155–172.Google Scholar
McMahon, R. J., Forehand, R. L., & Foster, S. L. (2005). Helping the noncompliant child: Family-based treatment for oppositional behavior. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Menaghan, E. G. (1989). Psychological well-being among parents and nonparents. Journal of Family Issues, 10, 547–565.Google Scholar
Morris-Yates, A., Andrews, G., Howie, P., & Henderson, S. (1990). Twins: A test of the equal environments assumption. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 81, 322–326.Google Scholar
Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling (6th ed.). Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Lichtenstein, P., Spotts, E. L., & Ganiban, J. (2007). Father–adolescent relationships and the role of genotype–environment correlation. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 560–571.Google Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Pedersen, N. L., Lichtenstein, P., Spotts, E. L., Hansson, K., et al. (2004). Genetic and environmental influences on mothering of adolescents: A comparison of two samples. Developmental Psychology, 40, 335–351.Google Scholar
O'Connor, T. G., Deater-Deckard, K., Fulker, D., Rutter, M., & Plomin, R. (1998). Genotype–environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: Antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting. Developmental Psychology, 34, 970–981.Google Scholar
O'Connor, T. G., Hetherington, E. M., Reiss, D., & Plomin, R. (1995). A twin-sibling study of observed parent–adolescent interactions. Child Development, 66, 812–829.Google Scholar
Peeters, H., Van Gestel, S., Vlietinck, R., Derom, C., & Derom, R. (1998). Validation of a telephone zygosity questionnaire in twins of known zygosity. Behavior Genetics, 28, 159–161.Google Scholar
Pincus, A. L. (2005). A contemporary integrative interpersonal theory of personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin, P. (2008). Behavioral genetics. New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nesselroade, J. R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1988). Genetic influence on childhood family environment perceived retrospectively from the last half of the life span. Developmental Psychology, 24, 738–745.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Reiss, D., Hetherington, E. M., & Howe, G. W. (1994). Nature and nurture: Genetic contributions to measures of the family environment. Developmental Psychology, 30, 32–43.Google Scholar
Prinzie, P., Stams, G. J. J. M., Deković, M., Reijntjes, A. H. A., & Belsky, J. (2009). The relations between parents' Big Five personality factors and parenting: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 351–362.Google Scholar
Rende, Richard D., Slomkowski, C. L., Stocker, C., Fulker, D. W., & Plomin, R. (1992). Genetic and environmental influences on maternal and sibling interaction in middle childhood: A sibling adoption study. Developmental Psychology, 28, 484–490.Google Scholar
Sadler, P., Ethier, N., Gunn, G. R., Duong, D., & Woody, E. (2009). Are we on the same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patterns during interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1005–1020.Google Scholar
Sadler, P., & Woody, E. (2003). Is who you are who you're talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarily in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 80–96.Google Scholar
Scarr, S., & Carter-Saltzman, L. (1979). Twin method: Defense of a critical assumption. Behavior Genetics, 9, 527–542.Google Scholar
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype → environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.Google Scholar
Seifritz, E., Esposito, F., Neuhoff, J. G., Lüthi, A., Mustovic, H., Dammann, G., et al. (2003). Differential sex-independent amygdala response to infant crying and laughing in parents versus nonparents. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 1367–1375.Google Scholar
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 199–202.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Ethier, N., & Sadler, P. (2012). Momentary assessment of interpersonal process in psychotherapy. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2003). Parenthood and marital satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 574–583.Google Scholar
van der Bruggen, C. O., Stams, G., & Bogels, S. M. (2008). Research review: The relation between child and parent anxiety and parental control: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 1257–1269.Google Scholar
van Geert, P. L. C., & Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. (2005). A dynamic systems approach to family assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 240–248.Google Scholar
Wade, T. D., & Kendler, K. S. (2000). The genetic epidemiology of parental discipline. Psychological Medicine, 30, 1303–1313.Google Scholar
Wasserman, G. A., Miller, L. S., Pinner, E., & Jaramillo, B. (1996). Parenting predictors of early conduct problems in urban, high-risk boys. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 1227–1236.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1996). An informal history of the interpersonal circumplex tradition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 217–233.Google Scholar