Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:04:36.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transcending Gender in the Performance of Kathak

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Purnima Shah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kathak, a classical dance form of Northern India, portrays an iconographic representation of the cultural constructs of the Hindu world view, most particularly, the ideology of gender roles within the culture. Essentially a dance form that emerged from within the Hindu religious beliefs and practices, Kathak was significantly influenced by the bhakti movement popularized in the early medieval period on the one hand, and on the other, by its incorporation in the Moghal courts after the fifteenth century. However, I limit my arguments to the Hindu concept of gender and its portrayal in the performance of Kathak. This paper focuses on the fluidity of gender performance in light of the indigenous philosophical concepts of “oneness” or non-dualism exemplified in Kathak abhinaya (1). This study is inspired by my observation and participatory experience as a dancer-performer of this form.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , Fall 1998 , pp. 2 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avalon, Arthur, trans. Mahanirvana Tantra (Tantra of the Great Liberation). New York: Dover Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Empire of Signs. Translated by Howard, Richard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1982.Google Scholar
Bhatta, Somadeva. Katha Sarit Sagara. Edited and translated by Brockhaus, Hermann. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1839.Google Scholar
Maharaj, Birju. Personal communication with author, Summer 1991.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice. “Descent and Sources of Contradiction in Representations of Women and Kinship.” In Gender and Kinship, edited by Collier, Jane F. and Yanagisako, Sylvia J., 324–340. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bosch, F. D. K.The Golden Germ: An Introduction to Indian Symbolism. The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1960.Google Scholar
Crooke, William C.The Tribes and Castes of the Northwestern Provinces and Oudh 3. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1896.Google Scholar
Egnor, Margaret Trawick. “The Sacred Spell and Other Conceptions of Life in Tamil Culture.” Ph.D. dissertation University of Chicago, 1978.Google Scholar
Foley, Kathy. “My Bodies: The Performer in West Java.” The Drama Review 34/2 (1990): 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, Manomohan, trans. The Natyasastra: A Treatise on Hindu Dramaturgy and Histrionics. Calcutta: Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1950.Google Scholar
Gross, Rita. “Hindu Female Deities as a Resource for the Contemporary Rediscovery of the Goddess.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 46 (1978): 269–92.Google Scholar
Haberman, David L.Acting as a Way of Salvation: A Study of Raganuga Bhakti Sadhana. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hein, Norvin. The Miracle Plays of Mathura. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Kane, P. V.History of Sanskrit Poetics. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas, 1961.Google Scholar
Katz, Jonathan. “The Musical Portions of Sangitaratnakara: A Critical Edition and Commentary.” D.Phil, thesis, University of Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
Krishnamachariar, M.History of Classical Sanskrit Literature. 3d. ed.Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas, 1974.Google Scholar
Larson, Gerald James, and Bhattacharya, Ram Shankar, eds. Samkhya: A Dualist Tradition in Indian Philosophy. Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Majumdar, Abhay Kumar. The Samkhya Conception of Personality. Delhi: Bharatiya Book Corporation, 1981.Google Scholar
Mason, J. L., and Patwardhan, M. V.Aesthetic Rapture: The Rasadhyaya of Natyashastra. Poona: Deccan College and Postgraduate Research Institute, 1970.Google Scholar
Meigs, Anna. “Multiple Gender Ideologies and Statuses.” In Beyond the Second Sex: New Directions in the Anthropology of Gender. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.Google Scholar
O'Flaherty, Wendy Doniger. Asceticism and Eroticism in the Mythology of Shiva. London: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
O'Flaherty, , trans. Hindu Myths: A Source Book Harmondsworth, Baltimore: Penguin, 1975.Google Scholar
O'Flaherty, , trans. Women, Androgynes, and Other Mythical Beasts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy. “Broken Symmetries: Memory, Sight, Love.” In Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Rawson, Philip S.The Art of Tantra. Greenwich: New York Graphic Society, 1973.Google Scholar
Shah, Purnima. “Innovations in Contemporary Kathak.” Master's thesis, Department of Dance, University of California at Los Angeles, 1992.Google Scholar
Shah, Purnima. “Farmayishi Poetics of Kathak: Significance of Reception.” UCLA Journal of Dance Ethnology 18 (1994): 1–7.Google Scholar
Singer, Milton, ed. Krishna: Myths, Rites and Attitudes. Honolulu: East-West Center Press, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarrilli, Phillip B.The Kathakali Complex: Actor, Performance and Structure. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications, 1984.Google Scholar
Zarrilli, Phillip B. “What Does it Mean to ‘Become a Character’: Power, Presence and Transcendence in Asian In-body Disciplines of Practice.” In By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatres and Ritual, edited by Schechner, Richard and Appel, Willa, 118–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Heinrich. Myths and Symbols in Indian Art and Civilization. Edited by Campbell, Joseph. New York: Harper and Row, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Heinrich. The Art of Indian Asia: Its Mythology and Transformations. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar