Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:55:58.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Appraisal and Pedagogical Practice: Performance-Based Assessment Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Extract

In the United States, educators of most school subjects, including arts and dance, are developing alternative measures to evaluate student learning at all educational levels. These measures can substitute for or supplement the short answer, multiple-choice, often standardized tests in common use. To differentiate this form of assessment of student learning from “tests,” innovators identify it by interchangeable names: authentic, performance, or performance-based assessment. In this essay I use these terms interchangeably. The innovators of authentic assessment focus on what students actually understand about the subjects they learn and if they can demonstrate their learning/understanding in two ways: in performance (doing) and with comprehension (explaining). In the study of dance, students more often demonstrate their learning by doing/dancing than they do by explaining. With both graduate and undergraduate dance students, I have experienced how performance-based assessment can facilitate the interaction of doing/dancing and explaining.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alter, Judith B. 1999. “Self-Appraisal of Learning for Pre-Service Dance Teachers with Teachers' Responses.” Abstract in New Horizons! 1999 Inaugural Conference Proceedings Manual. Bethesda, MD: National Dance Education Association.Google Scholar
Boykoff, Baron Joan and Wolfe, Dennie Palmer, eds. 1996. Performance-Based Student Assessment: Challenges and Possibilities. Ninety-fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Colwell, Richard. 1998. “Preparing Student Teachers in Assessment.” Arts Education Policy Review 99 (4): 2936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. 1996. Teacher Education for the Arts Disciplines: Issues Raised by the National Standards for Arts Education. (March).Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, Linda, Ancess, Jacqueline, Falk, Beverly. 1995. Authentic Assessment in Action: Studies of Schools and Students at Work. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Gallwey, Timothy W. 1997. The Inner Game of Tennis. Rev. ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gardner, Howard. 1983. Frames of Mind: Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: basic Books.Google Scholar
Howard, Gardner. and Perkins, David, eds. 1989. Art, Mind and Education: Research from Project Zero. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Goleman, Daniel, Kaufman, Paul, and Ray, Michel. 1992. The Creative Spirit. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Hanna, Judith Lynne. 1999. Partnering Dance and Education: Intelligent Moves for Changing Times. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Laban, Rudolph. 1975. Modern Educational Dance. Boston: Plays Incorporated.Google Scholar
Levine, Mindy N. 1994. Widening the Circle: Towards a New Vision For Dance Education, A Report of the National Task Force on Dance Education. Washington, DC: Dance/USA.Google Scholar
Marienau, C. and Fiddler, M.. 1997. “Enhancing Your Career Through Self-Assessment.” Journal of AHIMA 68 (10): 3033.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ruth. 1992. Testing for Learning: How New Approaches to Evaluation Can Improve American Schools. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Palomba, Catherine A. and Banta, Trudy W.. 1999. Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Pitman, Walter. 1998. Learning the Arts in An Age of Uncertainty. Ontario, Canada: Arts Education Council of Ontario.Google Scholar
Popham, James W. 1999. Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know. 2nd ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Ross, ed. 1986. Assessment in Arts Education: A Necessary Discipline or a Loss of Happiness? Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Sizer, Theodore R. 1992. Horace's School: Redesigning the American High School. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Grant P. 1993. Assessing Student Performance: Exploring the Purpose and Limits of Testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Grant P.. 1998. Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar