Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:20:17.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Related Pleasures: An Inquiry into Audience Experiences of Watching Dance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Matthew Reason  and
Dee Reynolds
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dance is frequently described as being “about” movement. “Dance,” writes Ann Daly, “although it has a visual component, is fundamentally a kinesthetic art” (Daly 1992, 243). Audience experiences of dance can therefore be conceptualized in terms of responses to movement, most prominently in terms of what has been described as “kinesthetic empathy.” What does it mean, however, to watch, respond to, or appreciate movement? And how does the historical and theoretical concept of kinesthetic empathy relate to contemporary audiences' articulations of the experience of watching dance?

This article sets out to answer these questions by exploring different kinds of kinesthetic and empathetic responses and pleasures (and indeed displeasures) articulated by spectators of live dance across different styles and contexts. Pleasure is of particular importance to audience studies because it relates to motivations. Why do people seek out dance performances to watch? What are they looking for in the experience? In this context, we are interested in kinesthetic empathy as a mode of engaging with dance that can give pleasure to spectators and can be a strong motivating factor in why people choose to watch dance.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , Winter 2010 , pp. 49 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 200

References

Works Cited

Barker, Martin. 2006. “I Have Seen the Future and It Is Not Here Yet …; or, on Being Ambitious for Audience Research.” Communication Review 9 (2): 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthoz, Alain. 2000. The Brain's Sense of Movement. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Nice, Richard. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calvo-Merino, Beatriz, Jola, CorinneGlaser, Daniel, and Haggard, Patrick. 2008. “Towards a Sensorimotor Aesthetics of Performing Art.” Consciousness and Cognition 17: 911–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvo-Merino, Beatriz, Grèzes, Julie, Glaser, Daniel, Passingham, Richard, and Haggard, Patrick. 2006. “Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation.” Current Biology 16 (19): 1905–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvo-Merino, Beatriz, Grèzes, Julie, Passingham, Richard, and Haggard, Patrick. 2005. “Action Observation and Acquired Motor Skills: An fMRI Study with Expert Dancers.” Cerebral Cortex 15: 1243–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clifton, Thomas. 1983. Music as Heard: A Study in Applied Phenomenology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Ann. 1992. “Dance History and Feminist Theory: Reconsidering Isadora Duncan and the Male Gaze.” In Gender in Performance: The Presentation of Difference in the Performing Arts, edited by Senelick, Laurence, 239–59. Hanover, NH: Tufts University/University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Foster, Susan. 2008. “Movement's Contagion: The Kinesthetic Impact of Performance.” In The Cambridge Companion to Performance Studies, edited by Davis, Tracy C., 46–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Susan. 2010. “Dancing with the ‘Mind's Muscles’: A Brief History of Kinesthesia and Empathy.” Keynote address, presented at the conference Kinesthetic Empathy: Concepts and Contexts, University of Manchester, April 2010 (available at <http://www.watchingdance.ning.com>).).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Foster,+Susan.+2010.+“Dancing+with+the+‘Mind's+Muscles’:+A+Brief+History+of+Kinesthesia+and+Empathy.”+Keynote+address,+presented+at+the+conference+Kinesthetic+Empathy:+Concepts+and+Contexts,+University+of+Manchester,+April+2010+(available+at+).>Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2002. The Work of Dance: Labor, Movement and Identity in the 1930s. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Gallese, Victor. 2008. “Empathy, Embodied Simulation, and the Brain: Commentary on Aragno and Zepf/Hartmann.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 56: 769–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geraghty, Christine. 1998. “Audiences and ‘Ethnography’: Questions of Practice.” In The Television Studies Book, edited by Geraghty, Christine and Lusted, David, 141–57. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Gibson, James Jerome. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gould, Glenn. 1984. The Glenn Gould Reader. Edited by Page, Tim. London: Butler and Tanner Ltd.Google Scholar
Hagendoorn, Ivar. 2004. “Some Speculative Hypotheses about the Nature and Perception of Dance and Choreography.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (3–4): 79–110.Google Scholar
Hagendoorn, Ivar. Forthcoming. “Dance, Choreography and the Brain.” In Art and the Senses, edited by Melcher, D. and Bacci, F., 499–514. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Järvinen, Hanna. 2007. “Some Steps Towards a Historical Epistemology of Corporeality.” In Society of Dance History Scholars, 30th Annual Conference Co-sponsored with CORD, 145–48. Paris: Centre national de la danse.Google Scholar
Lambert, Carrie. 2002. “On Being Moved: Rainer and the Aesthetics of Empathy.” In Yvonne Rainer: Radical Juxtapositions 1961–2002, edited by Sachs, S., 41–64. Philadelphia, PA: University of the Arts.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1933. The Modern Dance. New York: A. S. Barnes.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1936/1968. America Dancing: The Background and Personalities of the Modern Dance. New York: Dance Horizons.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1939. Introduction to the Dance. New York: Dance Horizons.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1963. John Martin's Book of the Dance. New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
McConachie, Bruce. 2008. Engaging Audiences: A Cognitive Approach to Spectating in the Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionary of English (OED). 2003. Edited by Soanes, C. and Stevenson, A.. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reason, Matthew. 2006. “Young Audience and Live Theatre, Part 1: Methods, Participation and Memory in Audience Research.” Studies in Theatre and Performance 26 (2): 129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Dee. 2007. Rhythmic Subjects: Uses of Energy in the Dances of Mary Wigman, Martha Graham and Merce Cunningham. Alton: Dance Books.Google Scholar
Sauter, Willmar. 2000. The Theatrical Event: Dynamics of Performance and Perception. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Schoenmakers, Henri. 1990. “The Spectator in the Leading Role: Developments in Reception and Audience Research within Theatre Studies.” In New Directions in Theatre Research, edited by Sauter, Willmar, 93–106. Munksgaard: Nordic Theatre Studies.Google Scholar
Silverman, David. 1993. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stein, Edith. 1970. On the Problem of Empathy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Titchener, Edward. 1909. Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of Thought Processes. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar