Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T03:28:13.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kapila Vatsyayan and Dance Scholarship: India and Beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Mohd Anis Md Nor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Beyond the Indian subcontinent Kapila Vatsyayan has become a legend. Although far from the center of the great Indian tradition, Southeast Asian dance scholars emulate Vatsyayan's work and have attempted similar studies of the classical dances within the Indie tradition in Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Many of us in Southeast Asia only hope that we can measure up to the strength of her scholarship. For us, the notion of the “great” and “small” traditions is both real and overwhelming.

Thirty years ago scholarship in Asian dance attained new heights with the publication of Vatsyayan's celebrated Classical Indian Dance in Literature and the Arts, the first exploration by an indigenous scholar of the relationship between classical Indian dance, literature, and sculpture. In particular, Vatsyayan opened new frontiers in the understanding of rasa theory beyond its convention as mood and evocation. She explicated the notion of rasa as a state of being and aesthetic theories of dance along with the study of literature, sculpture, painting, music and theater. Her work demonstrated an implicit understanding of performance theory and of deconstruction and reconstruction processes, by which I essentially mean emic attempts to construe or interpret dance. Deconstruction involves the dismantling of a dance form, genre, or repertory into the smallest units of contrasted movements recognized by people of a given dance tradition, while reconstruction refers to the ways these movements are structured within a larger movement system (1).

Type
Kapila Vatsyayan∼Honorary Papers
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , Summer 2000 , pp. 95 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brakel-Papenhuyzen, Clara. Classical Javanese Dance: The Surakarta Tradition and Its Terminology. Leiden: KITLV Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahyono, M. Dwi. “Economic Function of the Performing Arts in the Ancient Java and Bali Societies (IX-XI A.D.),” in SEAMEO-SPAFA Symposium on History of Performing Arts in Southeast Asia, Kuala Lumpur, National Arts Academy, 7-24 June 1997.Google Scholar
Fine Arts Department. Service of Archaeological Dances. Bangkok: Krom Silpakom, 1967.Google Scholar
Kaeppler, Adrienne L. “Dance and the Concept Of Style,” in Buckland, Theresa and Gore, Georgiana, eds. Dance, Styles, Youth, Identities. Straznice, Czech Republic: Institute of Folk Culture, Straznice and International Council for Traditional Music, 1998.Google Scholar
Miettinen, Jukka O.Classical Dance and Theatre in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mohd, Anis Md Nor. “Malaysia,” in The Dances of Asean. Brunei: ASEAN COCI, 1998.Google Scholar
Mohd, Anis Md Nor.Regional Performance Tradition in Contemporary Thai Performing Arts. Bangkok: Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 1996.Google Scholar
Poolthupya, Srisurang. “Thailand,” in The Dances of Asean. Brunei: ASEAN COCI, 1998.Google Scholar
Rutnin, Mattani Modjara. Dance, Drama, and Theatre in Thailand. Tokyo: The Toyo Bunko, 1993.Google Scholar
Sedyawati Hadimulyo, Edi. “Gambyong menurut Serat Cabolan dan Centini,” in Tari: Tinjauan dari Berbagai Segi. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya, 1984.Google Scholar
Sedyawati Hadimulyo, Edi. Pertumbuhan Seni Pertunjukan. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1981.Google Scholar
Sedyawati Hadimulyo, Edi. “Tari dalam sejarah kesenian Jawa dan Bali kuna,” in Jurusan Ilmu-Ilmu Sejarah. Jakarta: Fakulti Sastera. Universitas Indonesia, 1977.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Rapila. “Notes on the Relationship of Music and Dance in India,” Ethnomusicology 7, no. 1 (January 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatsyayan, Rapila. Classical Indian Dance in Literature and the Arts. New Delhi: Sangeet Natak Akademi, 1968.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Rapila. Indian Classical Dance. New Delhi: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1974.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Rapila. Ramayana in the Arts of Asia. Teheran: Asian Cultural Documentation Centre for UNESCO, 1975.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Rapila. Traditions of Indian Folk Dance. New Delhi: Indian Book Co., 1976.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Rapila. “The Dance Sculptures of Lara-Djonggrang (Prambanan),” National Centre for the Performing Arts Quarterly Journal 6, no. 1 (March 1977) ‘lsquo;Bombay’.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Rapila. “Some Evidence of Dance in Pagan,” National Centre for the Performing Arts Quarterly Journal 6, no. 4 (December 1977) ‘Bombay’.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Rapila. Dance in Indian Painting. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Rapila. Dance Sculpture in Sarangapani Temple. Madras: Society for Archaeological, Historical, and Epigraphical Research, 1982.Google Scholar