Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:46:39.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“You stole my work! And you stole it poorly!” Choreography, Copyright, and the Problem of Inexpert Iterations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2021

K.E. Gover
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dance theorists and legal scholars argue that choreography is by nature ill-suited to the conceptual framework provided by copyright, even as there is widespread agreement that works of dance deserve the legal protection and cultural endorsement that its inclusion represents. I reexamine the factors that are often cited as barriers to choreography's suitability for copyright. I argue that choreography is better suited to the copyright regime than it appears, so long as we recognize that the artistic standard for substantial similarity should be different from the legal standard.

Keywords

authorshipBeyoncéchoreographycopyrightDe KeersmaekerMyersownership
Type
Article
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , April 2021 , pp. 61 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Dance Studies Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abitabile, Kathleen, and Picerno, Jeanette. 2004. “Dance and the Choreographer's Dilemma: A Legal and Cultural Perspective on Copyright Protection for Choreographic Works.” Campbell Law Review 27 (1): 39–62.Google Scholar
Adler, Amy M., and Fromer, Jeanne. 2019. “Taking Intellectual Property into Their Own Hands.” California Law Review 107 (5): 1455–1530.Google Scholar
Armelagos, Adina, and Sirridge, Mary. 1978. “The Identity Crisis in Dance.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (2): 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1977. “The Death of the Author.” In Image, Music, Text, translated by Heath, Stephen, 142–148. London: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 2006. “The Work Itself.” In Art From Start to Finish, edited by Becker, Howard S., Faulkner, Robert R., and Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara, 21–30. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benton, Kate. 2008. “Can Copyright Perform the Perfect Fouetté? Keeping Law and Choreography on Balance to Achieve the Purposes of the Copyright Clause.” Pepperdine Law Review 36 (1): 59–128.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy B. 1987. “Masking Copyright Decisionmaking: The Meaninglessness of Substantial Similarity.” U. C. Davis Law Review 20 (4): 719–767.Google Scholar
Cohen, Selma Jeanne. 1997. “Dance and the Question of Fidelity.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 31 (2): 51–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, Renee. 2012. “Dance.” In The Continuum Companion to Aesthetics, edited by Adajian, Thomas and Ribeiro, Anna Christina, 156–170. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cramer, Lauren B. 1995. “Copyright Protection for Choreography: Can It Ever Be ‘En Pointe’? Computerized Choreography or Amendment: Practical Problems of the 1976 U.S. Copyright Act and Choreography.” Syracuse Journal of Legislation and Policy 1: 145–161.Google Scholar
Dutton, Dennis. 2003. “Authenticity in Art.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, edited by Levinson, Jerrold, 258–274. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. “What Is an Author?” In Language, Counter-Memory, and Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, translated by Bouchard, Donald and Simon, Sherry, edited by Bouchard, Donald, 113–138. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1989. “Repeatability, Reconstruction, and Beyond.” Theatre Journal 41 (4): 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2002. The Work of Dance: Labor, Movement, and Identity in the 1930s. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2011. “Writing for the Body: Notation, Reconstruction, and Reinvention in Dance.” Common Knowledge 17 (2): 231–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Eriq. 2011. “Why an Allegation that Beyoncé Plagiarized is Truly Unique (Analysis).” The Hollywood Reporter, October 13.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Jane. 2005. “The Author's Name as Trademark.” Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 23 (2): 379–389.Google Scholar
Godoy-Dalmau, Gabriel. 2017. “Substantial Similarity: Kohus Got It Right.” Michigan Business and Entrepreneurial Law Review 6 (2): 231–261.Google Scholar
Goehr, Lydia. 2007. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works. Rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goudreault, Jessica. 2017. “Copyrighting the Quotidian: An Analysis of Copyright Law for Postmodern Choreographers.” Cardozo Law Review 39 (2): 751–786.Google Scholar
Gover, Karen. 2018. Art and Authority: Moral Rights and Meaning in Contemporary Visual Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, Darren Hudson. 2013. “Appropriation and Transformation.” Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal 23 (4): 101–140.Google Scholar
Jordan, Stephanie. 2002. Moving Music: Dialogues with Music in Twentieth Century Ballet. Princeton: Princeton Book Co.Google Scholar
Kraut, Anthea. 2010. “‘Stealing Steps’ and Signature Moves: Embodied Theories of Dance as Intellectual Property.” Theater Journal 62 (2): 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Anthea. 2011. “White Womanhood, Property Rights, and the Campaign for Choreographic Copyright.” Dance Research Journal 43 (1): 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Anthea. 2016. Choreographing Copyright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakes, Joi Michelle. 2005. “A Pas De Deux for Choreography and Copyright.” New York University Law Review 80 (6): 1829–1861.Google Scholar
Lamarque, Peter. 1990. “The Death of the Author: An Analytical Autopsy.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (4): 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemley, Mark. 2010. “Our Bizarre System for Proving Copyright Infringement.” Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 57 (4): 719–742.Google Scholar
Lepecki, André. 2010. “The Body as Archive: Will to Re-Enact and the Afterlives of Dances.” Dance Research Journal 42 (2): 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Nicole. 2016. “Un-Blurring Substantial Similarity: Aesthetic Judgments and Romantic Authorship in Music Copyright Law.” New York University Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law 6 (1): 91–141.Google Scholar
Manley, Pauline. 2018. “Beyoncé and the Frump: Cover-Versioning in Dance.” Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture 3 (2): 258–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. 1981. “The Autographic Nature of Dance.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (4): 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers v. Harold, 279 F. Supp. 3d. 778 (N.D. Ill. 2017).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1971. “The Absurd.” The Journal of Philosophy 68 (20): 716–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NYU Tisch. 2021. “André T. Lepicki.” Tisch Directory. Accessed January 21, 2021. https://tisch.nyu.edu/about/directory/performance-studies/93142600.Google Scholar
Pavis, Mathilde, Waelde, Charlotte, and Whatley, Sarah. 2017. “Who Can Profit From Dance? An Exploration of Copyright Ownership.” Dance Research Journal 35 (1): 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouillaude, Frédéric. 2017. Unworking Choreography. Translated by Pakes, Anna. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryberg, Jesper. 1998. “On Goodman's Autographic/Allographic Distinction.” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 33 (1): 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillaci, Sophie. 2011. Beyoncé's ‘Countdown’ Video: Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker Reacts to Plagiarism Allegations (Video).” The Hollywood Reporter, October 10. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/beyonce-countdown-video-choreographer-reacts-246276.Google Scholar
Simonson, Robert. 2009. “Channeling Fosse: Beyoncé and Beyond.” Playbill. Accessed June 3, 2010. https://www.playbill.com/article/channeling-fosse-beyonce-and-beyond-com-158175.Google Scholar
Singer, Barbara A. 1984. “In Search of Adequate Protection for Choreographic Works: Legislative and Judicial Alternatives vs. the Custom of the Dance Community.” University of Miami Law Review 38 (2): 287–319.Google Scholar
Sparshott, Francis. 1995. A Measured Pace: Toward a Philosophical Understanding of the Arts of Dance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulcas, Roslyn. 2011. “Has Beyoncé Stepped Over the Line?” The Times, October 26.Google Scholar
Tang, Xiyin. 2012. “The Artist as Brand: Toward a Trademark Conception of Moral Rights.” Yale Law Journal 122 (1): 218–257.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Rebecca. 2013. “Performance Anxiety: Copyright Embodied and Disembodied.” Journal of the Copyright Society for the U.S.A. 60 (2): 1001–1040.Google Scholar
Van Camp, Julie. 1994. “Copyright in Choreographic Works.” In Entertainment, Publishing, and the Arts Handbook, edited by Breimer, Stephen F., Thorne, Robert, and Viera, John David, 59–92. New York: Clark Boardman Callaghan.Google Scholar
Wallis, Leslie Erin. 1986. “The Different Art: Choreography and Copyright.” UCLA Law Review 33 (5): 1442–1471.Google Scholar
Watkins, Edwina. 2003. “May I Have This Dance? Establishing a Liability Standard for Infringement of Choreographic Works.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law 10 (2): 437–463.Google Scholar
Weinhardt, Anne. 1987–1988. “Copyright Infringement of Choreography: The Legal Aspects of Fixation.” Journal of Corporation Law 13: 839–860.Google Scholar
Whiting, Evie. 2012. “Square Dance: Fitting the Square Peg of Fixation into the Round Hole of Choreographic Works.” Vanderbilt Law Review 65: 1261–1294.Google Scholar
Yeoh, Francis. 2013a. “Choreographers’ Moral Right of Integrity.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 8 (1): 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeoh, Francis. 2013b. “The Copyright Implications of Beyoncé's Choreographic ‘Borrowings.’” Choreographic Practices 4 (1): 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar