Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:48:35.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Larry Lavender
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In introducing and teaching art-critical skills—i.e., the skills of description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment—the greatest challenge for teachers of college and university dance students is to teach them confidently to formulate interpretations of the dances they see. With modest effort and practice students are able to gain proficiency in describing the visible features of a dance, as well as in marshaling descriptive/analytical evidence into defensible reasons for an aesthetic judgment. But the concept of interpretation is often difficult for students to grasp for two reasons. First, interpretation is tied to the philosophically slippery term “meaning.” Second, there is little consensus among theorists, artists, critics, and educators on what “interpretation” actually is, or how to go about doing it. This uncertainty in the professional ranks naturally filters down to students, causing some of them to grow nervously silent when faced with questions about meaning in dances and other works of art. Once silenced, of course, students are more likely to accept at face value the interpretive arguments of others rather than to develop their own aesthetic perspectives.

If students are to become critically literate, however, it is imperative for dance educators to explore with them various approaches to interpretation. Only then is it possible to present to students—as I will try to do here—an account of interpretation that they will find sensible, easy to articulate, and directly applicable in their own critical practice.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , Fall 1995 , pp. 25 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Hazard, and Searle, Leroy, eds. Critical Theory Since Plato. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971.Google Scholar
Adams, Hazard, and Searle, Leroy, eds. Critical Theory Since 1965. Tallahassee: University Presses of Florida, 1986.Google Scholar
Barnes, Annette. On Interpretation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Image, Music and Text. New York: Noonday Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe C.The Possibility of Criticism. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe C.Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism: New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., 1958.Google Scholar
Best, David. Philosophy and Human Movement. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1978.Google Scholar
Codd, John A. “Interpretive Cognition and the Education of Artistic Appreciation.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 16.3 (1982): 15–33.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. Art as Experience. New York: Perigree Books, 1934.Google Scholar
Ecker, David W. “Justifying Aesthetic Judgments.” Art Education 20 (1967): 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecker, David W. “The Artistic Process as Qualitative Problem Solving.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 21.3 (1963): 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecker, David W., and Kaelin, Eugene F.. “The Limits of Aesthetic Inquiry: A Guide to Educational Research.” In Philosophical Redirection of Educational Research: The Seventy-First Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, edited by Thomas, Lawrence G., 258–286. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Edie, James M.Edmund Husserl's Phenomenology: A Critical Commentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “Working on the Chain Gang: Interpretation in the Law and in Literary Criticism.” Critical Inquiry 9 (1982): 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Gardner, Howard. “Multiple Intelligences: Implications for Art and Creativity.” In Artistic Intelligences, edited by Moody, William J., 11–27. New York: Teachers College Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys. “Interpreting the Arts: The Patchwork Theory.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51.4 (1993): 597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Reinhardt. Phenomenology and Existentialism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar
Hanstein, Penelope. “On the Nature of Art Making in Dance: An Artistic Process Skills Model.” Ph.D. Diss., The Ohio State University, 1986.Google Scholar
Heyl, Bernard C. “The Critic's Reasons.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 16 (1957): 169–179.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E.D.The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E.D.Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Horton-Fraleigh, Sondra. Dance and the Lived Body - A Descriptive Aesthetics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Gibson, W.R. Boyce. New York: Collier Books, 1913/1962.Google Scholar
Ihde, Don. Experimental Phenomenology. New York: State University of New York Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Arnold. Aesthetics and the Theory of Criticism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Kaelin, Eugene F.An Existentialist Aesthetic. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Kaelin, Eugene F.An Aesthetics for Art Educators. New York: Teachers College Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Knapp, Steven, and Michaels, Walter Benn. Against Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavender, Larry. “Critical Evaluation in the Choreography Class.” Ph.D. Diss., New York University, 1993.Google Scholar
Lavender, Larry, and Oliver, Wendy. “Learning to ‘See’ Dance: The Role of Critical Writing in Developing Students' Aesthetic Awareness.” Impulse 1.1 (1993): 10–20.Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. “Reinterpreting Interpretation.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47.3 (1989): 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Robert J. “Describing and Interpreting a Work of Art.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36.1 (1977): 5–14.Google Scholar
Pepper, Stephen. The Basis of Criticism in the Arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine., ed. Illuminating Dance. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. Pragmatist Aesthetics. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. “Interpretation, Intention, and Truth.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46 (1988): 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. “The Logic of Interpretation.” Philosophical Quarterly 28 (1978): 310–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirridge, Mary, and Armelagos, Adina. “The In's and Out's of Dance: Expression as an Aspect of Style.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36.1 (1977): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Ralph. “Teaching Aesthetic Criticism in the Schools.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 7.1 (1973): 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sontag, Susan. Against Interpretation. New York: Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert. Doing Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975.Google Scholar
Stecker, Robert. “Relativism about Interpretation.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53.1 (1995): 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. Jr., and Beardsley, Monroe C.. “The Affective Fallacy.” Sewanee Review 57 (1949): 31–55.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. Jr., and Beardsley, Monroe C.. “The Intentional Fallacy.” In Wimsatt's, W. K.The Verbal Icon. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press (1954).Google Scholar