Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:05:59.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Specter of Interdisciplinarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Ramsay Burt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Theater dance is an interdisciplinary form, and some of the most interesting advances in progressive and experimental dance work in recent years have been interdisciplinary in nature. Where Anglo-American dance scholarship is concerned, however, a “theoretical turn” that has led some dance scholars to develop interdisciplinary methodologies has proved highly controversial. Interdisciplinarity is in danger of becoming a specter haunting dance scholarship.

Dance has not been alone in finding this transition difficult. As art historian and cultural theorist Mieke Bal has recently noted, one challenge facing the academy today is to find “a theoretical link between linguistic, visual and aural domains that blend so consistently in contemporary culture but remain so insistently separated as fields of study in the academy” (Bal 1999a, 10). Where dance is concerned, corporeality needs to be added to Bal's list of domains. This essay explores some of the reasons underlying resistance among Anglo-American dance scholars to the use of interdisciplinary methodologies. By doing so it aims to give an account of the public space in which recent examples of theater dance from Europe and the United States map out complex webs of relationships between corporeal, linguistic, visual, and aural levels of signification.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , Summer 2009 , pp. 3 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Albright, Ann Cooper. 1997. Choreographing Difference. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke, ed. 1999a. Introduction. The Practice of Cultural Analysis, 1–14. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bal, Mieke. 1999b. Quoting Caravaggio: Contemporary Art, Preposterous History. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Banes, Sally. 1987. Terpsichore in Sneakers. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Banes, Sally. 1989. “Letter (Terpsichore in Combat Boots)” TDR 33 (1) T-121: 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, Norman. 1997. “Cultural Studies and Dance History.” In Meaning in Motion, New Cultural Studies of Dance, edited by Desmond, Jane, 55–77. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ramsay. 2006. Judson Dance Theater: Performative Traces. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Nöel. 1981. “Postmodern Dance and Expression.” In Philosophical Essays on Dance, edited by Fancher, G. and Myers, G.. New York: Dance Horizons.Google Scholar
Carroll, Nöel. 2003. “Art History, Dance, and the 1960s.” In Reinventing Dance in the 1960s: Everything Was Possible, edited by Banes, Sally, 81–97. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marshall. 1981. “Primitivism, Modernism and Dance Theory.” In Philosophical Essays on Dance, edited by Fancher, G. and Myers, G., 138–56. New York: Dance Horizons.Google Scholar
Copeland, Roger. 1986. “Theatrical Dance: How Do We Know It When We See It If We Can't Define It?” Performing Arts Journal 26/27: 174–84.Google Scholar
Crow, Thomas. 1985. Painters and Public Life in Eighteenth-Century Paris. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Crow, Thomas. 1987. “The Birth and Death of the Viewer.” In Discussions in Contemporary Culture, edited by Foster, Hal, 1–8. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Crow, Thomas. 1996. Modern Art in the Common Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Ann. 1987. “The Balanchine Woman” Dram Review 113: 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Ann. 1998. “Bill T. Jones in Conversation with Ann Daly.” In Art Performs Life: Merce Cunningham, Meredith Monk, Bill T. Jones, 118–25. Minneapolis: Walker Art Center.Google Scholar
Dance Heritage Coalition (DHC). 2000. “America's Irreplaceable Dance Treasures: The First 100.” Retrieved April 20, 2006, from http://www.danceheritage.org/publications/dance_treasures.html.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur. 1997. The End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Demptster, Elizabeth. 1988. “Women Writing the Body: Let's Watch a Little How She Dances.” In Grafts: Feminist Cultural Criticism, edited by Sheridan, Susan, 35–54. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Desmond, Jane, ed. 1997. Meaning in Motion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forti, Simone. 1993. Art Archives: Simone Forti. Exeter: Arts Documentation Unit, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Foster, Hal, ed. 1987. Discussions in Contemporary Culture. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Susan Leigh. 1998. “Choreographies of Gender.” Signs 24 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2007. “Period Plots, Canonical Stages, and Post-Metanarrative in American Modern Dance.” In The Returns of Alwin Nikolais: Bodies, Boundaries and the Dance Canon, edited by Gitelman, Claudia and Martin, Randy, 170–89. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael. 1969. “Art and Objecthood.” In Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology, edited by Battcock, Gregory, 116–47. London: Studio Vista.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael. 1980. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and the Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Michael. 1987. “Theories of Art after Minimalism and Pop.” In Discussions in Contemporary Culture: Number One, edited by Foster, Hal, 55–58. Seattle: Dia Foundation/Bay Press.Google Scholar
Genné, Beth, and Hill, Constance Vallis. 2005. “Balanchine and the Black Dancing Body: A Preface.” Discourses in Dance 3 (3): 21–30.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Marianne. 1987/1988. “Ballerinas and Ball Passing.” Women and Performance 3 (2): 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschild, Brenda Dixon. 1996. Digging the Africanist Presence in American Performance: Dance and Other Contexts. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Clement. 1960–1965/1982. “Modernist Painting” In Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology, edited by Frascina, Francis and Harrison, Charles, 5–19. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Holzer, Jenny. 1998. “Truisms.” In Jenny Holzer, edited by Joselit, David, Simon, Joan, and Saleci, Renata, 116–19. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Joselit, David. 1998. “Voices, Bodies and Spaces: The Art of Jenny Holzer.” In Jenny Holzer, edited by Joselit, David, Simon, Joan, and Saleci, Renata, 40–77. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Kirstein, Lincoln. 1935/1969. Dance: A Short History of Classic Theatrical Dancing. New York: Dance Horizons.Google Scholar
Koritz, Amy. 1996. “Re/Moving Boundaries: From Dance History to Cultural Studies.” In Moving Words, edited by Morris, Gay, 88–103. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levin, David Michael. 1983. “Balanchine's Formalism.” In What Is Dance? edited by Copeland, Roger and Cohen, Marshall, 123–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, André. 1983. “The Idea of Dance from Aristotle to Mallarmé.” In What Is Dance? edited by Copeland, Roger and Cohen, Marshall, 47–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, Susan. 1988. “Modernist Dogma and Post-Modem Rhetoric.” TDR 32 (4) T-120: 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Susan. 1989. “Terpsichore in Combat Boots.” TDR 33 (1) T-121: 15–16.Google Scholar
Manning, Susan. 2006a. “Letter from the President.” Society of Dance History Scholars Newsletter 26 (1): 1–2.Google Scholar
Manning, Susan. 2006b. “Letter from the President.” Society of Dance History Scholars Newsletter 26 (2): 1–2.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1939/1965. Introduction to the Dance. New York: Dance Horizons.Google Scholar
Morris, Gay, ed. 1996. Moving Words. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Owens, Craig. 1992. Beyond Recognition: Representation, Power, and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rainer, Yvonne. 1974. Work 1961–73. Halifax, NS: Press of Novia Scotia College of Art and Design.Google Scholar
Rifkin, A. 1986. “Art Histories.” In The New Art History, edited by Rees, A. L. and Borzello, F., 157–63. London: Camden Press.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 1979. The Phenomenology of Dance. London: Dance Books.Google Scholar
Wolff, Janet. 1997. “Reinstating Corporeality: Feminism and Body Politics.” In Meaning in Motion: New Cultural Studies of Dance, edited by Desmond, Jane, 55–57. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar