Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:23:45.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Participation in Dance on the Attitudes of French Children as Measured by Domain Discrimination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Nelson D. Neal  and
Jeanne Marie Dineur
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is generally agreed that attitudes are composed of elements from the affective, behavioral, and cognitive domains. The affective component has been referred to as a feeling or an emotional response of liking or disliking, a gut reaction, or sympathetic nervous activity. The behavioral component includes overt actions or intentions of action, and verbal statements regarding future behavior. The cognitive component includes knowledge and beliefs of the attitude object that describe its characteristics, and its relationship to other objects (Breckler 1984, Katz 1960, Morris and Stuckhardt 1977).

Recent attitude research suggests discriminating between the three psychological domains, either by measuring each or by specifying which one is the focus of concern. Discrimination may be appropriate since the three domains are distinguishable from one another and correlations among them are sometimes moderate (Breckler 1984). Discrimination among attitudinal domains also appears to be necessary since it has been found that directing change at one of the three domains may affect a shift in the other two (Cialdini et al. 1976, Katz 1960), and because differences between groups of subjects may fall within one or two of the domains rather than all three (Quattrone 1985).

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , Fall 1991 , pp. 11 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, P. (1976). An instrument to measure the creative dance attitudes of grade five children. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alabama, 1976), Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 7065A.Google Scholar
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191–1205.Google Scholar
Brown, F. G. (1970). Principles of Educational and Psychological Testing, Hinsdale, Illinois: The Dryden Press Inc.Google Scholar
Burton, C. (1977). Influence of instructional media on attitudes of modern dance students toward movement. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia), Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 6599A.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Levy, A., Herman, C. P., Kozloski, L., and Petty, R. E. (1976). Elastic shifts of opinion: Determinants of direction and durability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 663–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsted, C. E. D. (1980). An analysis of attitudes and definitions by selected teachers and pupils toward dance in general and dance in the classroom. (Doctoral Dissertation, Wayne State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 4330A.Google Scholar
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.Google Scholar
Kenyon, G. S. (1968). Six scales for assessing attitude toward physical activity. Research Quarterly, 39, 566–574.Google Scholar
Lord, M., and Petiot, B. (1985). A characterization of recreational dance classes. Unpublished presentation, Association International des Ecoles Superieurd'Education Physique World Conference, New York, August 1985.Google Scholar
Magill, R. A. (1985). Motor Learning Concepts & Applications, (2nd edition). Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown, Publishers.Google Scholar
Morris, J. W. and Stuckhardt, M. H. (1977). Art attitude: Conceptualization and implication. Studies in Art Education, 17, 25–31.Google Scholar
Neal, N. D. (1983). The effects of a modern dance workshop on the attitude of fourth grade boys and girls. Final report (83–209), Commission for the Arts, Richmond, Virginia.Google Scholar
Neal, N. D. (1985). Assessment of attitude change and position shift in fourth graders after participation in modern dance. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Virginia, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2962A.Google Scholar
Neal, N. D., Bonaiuto, P., Giannini, A. M. Laakso, L., and Lord, M. (1986). An international comparison of children's attitudes toward dance. Unpublished presentation, Association International des Ecoles Superieurd'Education Physique World Conference, Heidelberg, West Germany, August 22–26, 1986.Google Scholar
Neal, N. D. & Laakso, L., (1987). Amerikkalaisten ja suomalaisten peruskoululaisten tanssiasenteista [A comparison of dance attitudes between American and Finnish Children], Liikunta ja Tieda, 24, 196–199.Google Scholar
Neal, N. D. and Fortin, S. (1989). Domain discrimination in dance attitude research. Unpublished presentation, American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance National Convention, Boston, April 19–23, 1989.Google Scholar
Quattrone, G. A. (1985). On the congruity between internal states and action. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. A. (1982). Motor Control and Learning, Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
Schutz, R. W., Smoll, F. L. and Wood, T. M. (1981). Physical activity and sport: Attitudes and perceptions of young Canadian athletes. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science, 6, 32–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Simon, J. A. and Smoll, F. L. (1974). An instrument for assessing children's attitudes toward physical activity. Research Quarterly, 45, 407–415.Google Scholar
SPSS Inc. (1986). SPSSx User's Guide (2nd ed.). Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Starkes, J. L., Deakin, J. M., Lindley, S., and Crisp, F. (1987). Motor versus verbal recall of ballet sequences by young expert dancers. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 222–230.Google Scholar
Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798–810.Google Scholar
Wood, W., Kallgren, C.A., and Priesler, R. M. (1982). Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message and communicator attributes. Unpublished presentation, Midwestern Psychological Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1982.Google Scholar