Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:48:53.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Secularisation and the religious components of marriage seasonality in the Don Army Territory (Southern Russia), 1867–1916

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2013

NOËL BONNEUIL  and
ELENA FURSA
NOËL BONNEUIL
Affiliation:
Institut national d'études démographiques and École des hautes études en sciences sociales.
ELENA FURSA
Affiliation:
Federal University of South Russia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The quality of the statistical archives of the Don Army Territory for the period 1867–1916 offers a unique opportunity to compare the denominations present (Orthodox, Old Believers and Coreligionists, Catholics, Lutherans, Jews, Armenian-Gregorians, Lamaist Buddhists and Muslims) in a context of urbanisation, secularisation and industrialisation. The observance of religious interdicts varied between and within denominations depending on levels of urbanisation and the district considered. These contrasts reveal the segmentation of Don society, the constraints imposed by agrarian imperatives and military obligations, the differences in the economy and between town and country, and the advance of secularisation or persistence of tradition.

Sécularisation et composantes religieuses de la saisonnalité des mariages dans le territoire de l'armée du don (au sud de la russie), 1867–1916

La qualité des archives statistiques du Territoire de l'armée du Don pour la période 1867–1916 offre une occasion unique de comparer les groupes de confessions religieuses différentes qui s'y trouvaient alors en présence (orthodoxes, vieux-croyants et coreligionnaires, catholiques, luthériens, juifs, arméniens grégoriens, bouddhistes tibétains et musulmans) dans un contexte d'urbanisation, de sécularisation et d'industrialisation. Le respect des interdits religieux variait suivant les confessions et au sein des groupes eux-mêmes, selon le niveau d'urbanisation et le secteur considéré. Ces contrastes révèlent une segmentation de cette société du Don qui subissait les contraintes imposées d'un côté par les impératifs agricoles et de l'autre par les obligations militaires; des différences apparaissent dans l'économie et aussi entre ville et campagne, et l'on note soit l'avance d'une sécularisation soit la persistance d'une tradition.

Säkularisierung und religiöse komponenten der heiratssaisonalität in der armeeregion am don (südrussland), 1867–1916

Die Qualität des für den Zeitraum 1867–1916 verfügbaren statistischen Archivmaterials für die Armeeregion am Don eröffnet die einzigartige Möglichkeit, die dort lebenden Glaubensgemeinschaften (Orthodoxe, Altgläubige and Glaubensbrüder, Katholiken, Lutheraner, Juden, armenische Gregorianer, lamaistische Buddhisten und Muslime) im Kontext von Urbanisierung, Säkularisierung und Industrialisierung miteinander zu vergleichen. Die Einhaltung religiöser Interdikte variierte zwischen den Glaubensgemeinschaften sowie innerhalb derselben und hing sowohl vom Urbanisierungsgrad als auch von der Region ab. Diese Kontraste verdeutlichen die Segmentierung der Geslleschaft am Don, die aus agrarischen Bedingungen und militärischen Verpflichtungen erwachsenen Zwänge, die ökonomischen Unterschiede zwischen Stadt und Land, und den Fortschritt der Sakularisierung sowie die Beharrungskraft der Tradition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Continuity and Change , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , May 2013 , pp. 51 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ENDNOTES

1 K. C. Talheim, ‘Russia's economic development’, in G. Katkov, E. Oberländer, N. Poppe and G. von Rauch eds., Russia enters the twentieth century (London, 1971), 85–110; Blackwell, Peter ed., Russian economic development from Peter the Great to Stalin (New York, 1974)Google Scholar.

2 Andreas Kappeler, La Russie empire multiethnique (Paris, 1994).

3 Anatoli Agafonov and Anatoli Venkov, История донского казачества [History of the Don Cossacks] (Rostov-on-Don, 2008).

4 Ibid.

5 O'Rourke, Shane, Warriors and peasants, the Don Cossacks in late imperial Russia (London, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 John S. Curtiss, ‘Church and state’, in Cyril E. Black ed., The transformation of the Russian society since 1861 (Cambridge, MA, 1960), 405–24.

7 Ibid.

8 Bonneuil, Noël and Fursa, Elena, ‘Optimal population path fitting for flawed vital statistics and censuses’, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 148, 2 (2011), 301–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bonneuil, Noël and Fursa, Elena, ‘Optimal marriage fitting for imperfect statistics’, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 153, 2 (2012), 532–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Peter Holquist, Making war, forging revolution: Russia's continuum of crisis 1914–1921.

10 Ibid.

11 A. Agafonov, ДОНСКИЕ КАЗАКИ. ГРУДь В КРЕСТАХ … /Из истории пожаловани&icybreve;, наград и знаков отличия донского казачества. XVI – начало XX веков [Don Cossacks: breasts covered with crosses … through the history of rewards, medals, and marks of distinction of the Don Cossacks, 16th to early 19th century] (Rostov-on-Don, 2009).

12 O'Rourke, Warriors and peasants.

13 Ibid.

14 Holquist, Making war, forging revolution.

15 McNeal, Robert, Tsar and Cossack, 1855–1914 (London, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Dupâquier, Michel, ‘Le mouvement saisonnier des mariages en France (1856–1968)’, Annales de démographie historique (1977), 131–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Houdaille, Jacques, ‘Un indicateur de pratique religieuse: la célébration saisonnière des mariages avant, pendant et après la Révolution française (1740–1829)’, Population 2 (1978), 365–80Google Scholar; Noël Bonneuil, ‘Démographie de la nuptialité au XIXe siècle’, in Jacques Dupâquier and Denis Kessler eds., La société française au XIXe siècle (Paris, 1992), 82–120.

17 McQuillan, Kevin, ‘Economic structure, religion, and age at marriage: some evidence from Alsace’, Journal of Family History 14, 4 (1989), 331–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 González-Martín, A., ‘Ecological and cultural pressure on marriage seasonality in the principality of Andorra’, Journal of Biosocial Sciences 40, 1 (2008), 1–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

19 van Poppel, Frans, ‘Seasonality of work, religion and popular customs: the seasonality of marriage in the nineteenth- and twentieth century Netherlands’, Continuity and Change 10, 2 (1995), 215–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 García-Moro, C., Hernández, M. and Martinic, M., ‘Estacionalidad de los matrimonios en Magallanes, Chile (1885–1920)’, Anales Instituto Patagónico 21 (1992), 47–61Google Scholar.

21 Gunn, P. A., ‘Productive cycles and the season of marriages: a critical test’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History XXI, 2 (1990), 217–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Luchetti, E., Manfredini, M., Boëtsch, G., Bley, D., Aluja, P., Pena, J., Revello, D., Melleri, R. and Sevin, A., ‘Changes in marriage seasonality among some European rural populations’, International Journal of Anthropology 11, 2–4 (1996), 73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Avdeev, A., Blum, A. and Troitskaia, I., ‘Le mariage paysan russe au XIXe siècle’, Population 6 (2004), 833–76Google Scholar.

24 Bourgeois, Jean, ‘Le mariage comme coutume saisonnière, contribution à une étude sociologique de la nuptialité en France’, Population 4 (1946), 623–42Google Scholar; Jacques Houdaille, ‘Un indicateur de pratique religieuse…’; Galloway, Patrick, ‘Basic patterns in annual variations in fertility, nuptiality, mortality and prices in preindustrial Europe’, Population Studies 42 (1988), 275–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar; A. Kussmaul, A general view of the rural economy of England, 1538–1840 (Cambridge, 1990).

25 Bonneuil, ‘Démographie de la nuptialité au XIXe siècle’.

26 Van Poppel, ‘Seasonality of work, religion and popular customs’.

27 Ronald Lesthaeghe, ‘Moral control, secularization and reproduction in Belgium (1600–1900)’, in Société belge de démographie ed., Historiens et populations (Louvain-la-Neuve, 1991), 259–79; Bonneuil, ‘Démographie de la nuptialité au XIXe siècle’.

28 McNeal, Tsar and Cossack; Holquist, Making war, forging revolution; O'Rourke, Warriors and peasants.

29 Agafonov and Venkov, History of the Don Cossacks.

30 Cyril E. Black ed., The transformation of the Russian society since 1861 (Cambridge, MA, 1960).

31 The ‘Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire’ (Svod Zakonov Rossiskoj imperii) Volume X, article no. 25–33, St-Petersburg, was presented to Nicholas II in 1900; Edition of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Empire. Anatoli Agafonov, historian emeritus, says that no name was attached to this edition.

32 The Julian calendar was used until 14 February 1918 when it was abrogated by the Soviet government who adopted the Gregorian calendar.

33 Agafonov and Venkov, History of the Don Cossacks.

34 Curtiss, ‘Church and state’, 407.

35 V. Tzipin, Церковное право. Издательство МФТИ [Ecclesiastical law] (Moscow, 1994); S. V. Rimskii, Православная церковь и государство в XIX веке: Д онская епархия от прошлого к настоящему [The Orthodox Church and the state in the nineteenth century. Don Eparchy: from past to future] (Rostov-on-Don, 1998).

36 F. Elkin and P. Koulkess eds., All Rostov-on-Don and Nakhichevan' in 1913 [in Russian] (Rostov-on-Don, 1913, 1914).

37 McNeal, Tsar and Cossack; Curtiss, ‘Church and state’.

38 Van Poppel, ‘Seasonality of work, religion and popular customs’.

39 Procedures X11 and X12 in SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

40 See Chapter 21: the X11 procedure, SAS OnlineDocTM: Version 7-1, http://www.okstate.edu/sas/v7/saspdf/ets/chap21.pdfcf1

41 Jean Ganiage, Le Beauvaisis au XVIIIe siècle: la campagne (Paris, 1988); Ogden, Philip, ‘Patterns of marriage seasonality in rural France’, Local Population Studies 10 (1973), 53–63Google Scholar; Dupâquier, ‘Le mouvement saisonnier des mariages en France (1856–1968)’.

42 Van Poppel, ‘Seasonality of work, religion and popular customs’.

43 Bonneuil, ‘Démographie de la nuptialité au XIXe siècle’.

44 Ibid. Figure III.9 has a printing error that has inverted the ‘urban’ and ‘rural’ labels.

45 Dupâquier, ‘Le mouvement saisonnier des mariages en France (1856–1968)’.

46 Bonneuil, ‘Démographie de la nuptialité au XIXe siècle’.

47 Van Poppel, ‘Seasonality of work, religion and popular customs’.

48 E. I. Serii, Рабочие юга России в период империализма (1900–1913) [Workers in southern Russia in the imperialist era (1910–1913)] (Rostov-on-Don, 1971).

49 Ibid.; Dorothy Atkinson, The end of the Russian land commune: 1905–1930 (Stanford, 1983).

50 Noël Bonneuil and Elena Fursa, ‘Religions and nuptiality patterns in the Don Army Territory (Southern Russia), 1867–1916’ (in preparation).

51 Noël Bonneuil, Transformation of the French demographic landscape, 1806–1906 (Oxford, 1997).

52 Lesthaeghe, Ronald, ‘On the social control of human reproduction’, Population and Development Review VI, 4 (1980), 527–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Longworth, Philip, The Cossacks (London, 1969)Google Scholar.

54 F. F. Mendels, ‘Seasons and regions in agriculture and industry during the process of industrialization’, in S. Pollard ed., Region and industrialisation. Studies on the role of the region in the economic history of the last two centuries (Göttingen, 1980), 179–80.

55 Bonneuil, ‘Démographie de la nuptialité au XIXe siècle’.

56 Ibid.

57 Kappeler, La Russie empire multiethnique.

58 Van Poppel, ‘Seasonality of work, religion and popular customs’.

59 Mendels, ‘Seasons and regions in agriculture and industry during the process of industrialization’.

60 Kussmaul, General view of the rural economy of England.

61 Fursa, Elena, ‘Armenians and Jews of the Don Territory from early 19th to early 20th century (until 1930)’, Population and Crises 7 (2001), 93–119Google Scholar [article in Russian].

62 Kappeler, La Russie empire multiethnique.

63 Ibid.

64 O'Rourke, Warriors and peasants.

65 The dates of the Muslim calendar vary with the lunar phases observed locally, so the day of the celebration of Aïd el-Kebir varies geographically depending on when the full moon is observed. European Muslim communities generally take the same rule as the countries they originate from. For example, the year 1425 began on 20 or 21 January 2004, the year 1426 on 10 or 11 January 2006, the year 1427 on 30 or 31 December 2006, the year 1428 on 21 December 2007 in Morocco and on 19 December in the rest of the world.

66 Anderson, M., ‘Marriage patterns in Victorian Britain: an analysis based on registration district data for England and Wales 1861’, Journal of Family History 1, 1 (1976), 55–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

67 Akima, H., ‘A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures’, Journal of the ACM 17, 4 (1970), 589–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D. and Vecchi, M. P., ‘Optimization by simulated annealing’, Science 220, 4598 (1983), 671–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.