Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2011
This article explores how the reputations and agency of middling and plebeian women in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century London were affected by what they wore. Compared with provincial England, markets for women's clothes in the capital were more diverse and accessible. Ambiguous moral judgments were made of women based on their dress, but many sought to acquire good, fashionable attire as the right clothes would improve their options in terms of courtship, sociability and employment, as well as facilitating their ability to negotiate the metropolitan environment and providing them with a ready store of capital. Clothes were thus contested commodities which helped define the limits of the possible for women in early modern London.
L'ambition de cet article est de rechercher comment la réputation et l'action des femmes ordinaires ou de milieu très populaire, vivant à Londres aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles, étaient affectées par les vêtements qu'elles portaient. Si l'on compare avec la province anglaise, le marché du vêtement féminin était, dans la capitale, plus varié et plus accessible. La valeur morale des femmes était, de façon ambiguë, souvent estimée à l'aune de la robe qu'elles portaient. Mais beaucoup cherchaient à acquérir de bons atours qui soient à la mode, étant donné que des habits comme il faut ne manqueraient pas d'améliorer leurs chances de se faire courtiser, de se socialiser et d'être employée. Tout autant, un vêtement convenable les aiderait à s'adapter à l'environnement métropolitain et leur constituerait un capital immédiat. Pour les femmes de la Londres de l'époque moderne, les vêtements étaient par conséquent des produits contestés qui les aidaient à définir les limites du possible.
Dieser Beitrag untersucht, inwiefern Ansehen und Verhalten von Frauen in den Mittel- und Unterschichten im London des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts davon beeinflusst wurden, was sie anhatten. Im Vergleich zur englischen Provinz war in der Hauptstadt der Markt für Frauenkleidung reichhaltiger und leichter zugänglich. Auch wenn die Werturteile, die über Frauen auf Grund ihrer Kleidung gemacht wurden, mehrdeutig waren, setzten viele Frauen auf den Erwerb guter und modischer Kleidung, weil die richtige Garderobe ihre Handlungsmöglichkeiten beim Werben um Männer, im Bereich der Geselligkeit bei der Suche nach Beschäftigung verbesserten und es ihnen überdies erleichterte, sich in der Umgebung der Metropole zu bewegen, und sie dadurch nicht zuletzt über einen handlichen Kapitalstock verfügten. Kleider waren somit heiß umkämpfte Waren, die Frauen im frühneuzeitlichen London dabei halfen, die Grenzen des Möglichen abzustecken.
1 C. Richardson, ‘Introduction’, in C. Richardson ed., Clothing culture, 1350–1650 (Aldershot, 2004), 17; S. Mendelson and P. Crawford, Women in early modern England 1550–1720 (Oxford, 1998), 59.
2 Hooper, W., ‘The Tudor sumptuary laws’, English Historical Review 30 (July 1915), 433–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; F. E. Baldwin, Sumptuary legislation and personal regulation in England (Baltimore, 1926), 192–275; N. B. Harte, ‘State control of dress and social change in pre-industrial England’, in D. C. Coleman and A. H. John eds., Trade, government and economy in pre-industrial England: essays presented to F. J. Fisher (London, 1976), 132–65; S. Vincent, Dressing the elite: clothes in early modern England (Oxford and New York, 2003), 117–52; A. Ribiero, Fashion and fiction: dress in art and literature in Stuart England (New Haven and London, 2005), 161–2; Phillips, K. M., ‘Masculinities and the medieval English sumptuary laws’, Gender and History 19, 1 (2007), 22–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 An acte for reformation of apparell to be worn by prentices, and maid-servants, within the Citty of London, and the Liberties thereof (1611); London Metropolitan Archives, London (hereafter LMA), MSS MJ/SR/1096, items 59, 63; MJ/SR/1111, items 49, 79; R. B. Shoemaker, Prosecution and punishment: petty crime and the law in London and rural Middlesex, c. 1660–1725 (Cambridge, 1991), 179–80.
4 K. Newman, Fashioning femininity and English Renaissance drama (Chicago and London, 1991), 111–27, 131–40; Warren, I., ‘“Witty offending great ones”? Elite female householders in an early Stuart Westminster parish’, London Journal 32 (2007), 211–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 M. Pelling, ‘Appearance and reality: barber surgeons, the body and disease’, in A. L. Beier and R. Finlay eds., London 1500–1700: the making of the metropolis (London, 1986), 91–3; Dabhoiwala, F., ‘The construction of honour, reputation and status in late-seventeenth and early-eighteenth century England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 6th series, 6 (1996), 207–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar; L. Gowing, Domestic dangers, women, words and sex in early modern London (Oxford, 1996), 82–3, 90–1; J. Styles, The dress of the people: everyday fashion in eighteenth-century England (New Haven and London, 2007), 32–3, 52–4, 210–11; Korhonen, A., ‘To see and be seen: beauty in the early modern London street’, Journal of Early Modern History 12 (2008), 340CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Varholy, C. M., ‘“Rich like a lady”: cross-class dressing in the brothels and theatres of early modern London’, Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 8 (2008), 4–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 F. Braudel, The structures of everyday life: the limits of the possible, trans. S. Reynolds (New York, 1981), 315–21, 325–8; D. Keene, ‘Material London in time and space’; J. Thirsk, ‘England's provinces: did they serve or drive material London?’; J. Schneider, ‘Fantastical colors in foggy London: the new fashion potential of the late sixteenth century’; A. R. Jones and P. Stallybrass, ‘“Rugges of London and the Diuell's Band”: Irish mantles and yellow starch as hybrid London fashion’, in L. C. Orlin ed., Material London, ca. 1600 (Philadelphia, 2000), 66, 100–3, 109–49; Lemire, B., ‘Domesticating the exotic: floral culture and the East India calico trade with England, c. 1600–1800’, Textile 1 (2003), 64–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ribiero, Fashion and fiction, 297–8.
7 R. Hentschell, ‘A question of nation: foreign clothes on the English subject’, in C. Richardson ed., Clothing culture, 1350–1650 (Aldershot, 2004), 49–53; Ribiero, Fashion and fiction, 164–5, 297.
8 Sermons, or homilies, to be read in churches in the time of Queen Elizabeth of famous memory (London, 1817), 286, 290.
9 T. Dekker, A rod for run-awayes (1625), sig. C2v.
10 R. Parkinson ed., The life of Adam Martindale (Manchester, 1845), 6–7.
11 L. L. Peck, Consuming splendour: society and culture in seventeenth-century England (Cambridge, 2005), 28; E. Salter, ‘Reworked material: discourses of clothing culture in early sixteenth-century Greenwich’, in C. Richardson ed., Clothing culture, 1350–1650 (Aldershot, 2004), 180; T. Tuke, A treatise against painting and tincturing of men and women (1616), 62; J. Williams, A sermon of apparell, preached before the Kings Maiestie and the Prince his Highnesse at Theobalds, the 22 of February, 1619 (1620), 11.
12 C. Barron, C. Coleman and C. Gobbi eds., ‘The London journal of Alessandro Magno 1562’, London Journal 9 (1983), 144.
13 W. B. Rye ed., England as seen by Foreigners in the Days of Elizabeth (London, 1865), 7–8.
14 Thomas Platter's travels in England 1599, trans. C. Williams (London, 1937), 182.
15 F. Morrison, An itinerary written by Fynes Moryson gent. First in the Latin tongue and then translated by him into English. Containing his ten yeeres travell through the twelve dominions of Germany, Bohmerland, Switzerland, Netherland, Denmarke, Poland, Italy, Turky, France, England, Scotland, and Ireland (1617), part III, book iii, chapter 3, 179.
16 The journal of William Schellinks travels in England 1661–1663, ed. and trans. M. Exwood and H. L. Lehmann, Camden fifth series, I (London, 1993), 84.
17 Guildhall Library, London (hereafter GL) MS 33011/4, fos. 40r, 62v.
18 The unnatural grand mother (1659), 7.
19 R. Latham and W. Matthews eds., The diary of Samuel Pepys (London, 1970–76), 9 volumes: i, 248; Old Bailey Papers Online (hereafter OBP), 3 September 1690 (t16900903-32); 2 July 1684 (t16840702-6).
20 Styles, Dress of the people, 290; Ribiero, Fashion and fiction, 168.
21 H. Woolley, The gentlewoman's companion; or a guide to the female sex (1673), 55–6.
22 The London lasses lamentation: or, her fear she should never be married (n.d., 1688–92?); The sorrowful assembly: or, the maidens humble petition to the batchelors of London, to be kind to them in their distress (n.d., 1684–85?).
23 P. Clark, The English alehouse: a social history 1200–1830 (London, 1983), 149.
24 Diary of Samuel Pepys, ii, 192; iv, 199; v, 273; vi, 332.
25 E. Kynd, Londons-nonsuch; or, the glory of the Royal Exchange (1668), no pagination.
26 A. Marsh, The ten pleasures of marriage, relating all the delights and contentments that are mask'd under the bands of matrimony (1682), 58, 203.
27 S. Shesgreen, Images of the outcast: the urban poor in the cries of London (Manchester, 2002), 56–9; I. W. Archer, ‘Material Londoners?’, in L. C. Orlin ed., Material London, ca. 1600 (Philadelphia, 2000), 186; L. Thomson, , ‘“As proper a woman as any in Cheap”: women in shops on the early modern stage’, Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 16 (2003), 146–7Google Scholar, 159.
28 Styles, Dress of the people, 52.
29 C. Heyl, ‘When they are veyl'd on purpose to be seen: the metamorphosis of the mask in seventeenth and eighteenth century London’, in J. Entwistle and E. Wilson eds., Body dressing (Oxford and New York, 2001), 121–42; Ribiero, Fashion and fiction, 124–6, 263–4.
30 Diary of Samuel Pepys, vi, 41.
31 Crawford, P. and Mendelson, S., ‘Sexual identities in early modern England: the marriage of two women in 1680’, Gender and History 7, 3 (1995), 362–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Capp, B., ‘Playgoers, players and cross-dressing in early modern London: the Bridewell evidence’, The Seventeenth Century 18 (2003), 164–7Google Scholar.
32 OBP, 12 December 1677 (t16771212-9); 12 December 1683 (t16831212-27).
33 Weatherill, L., ‘Consumer behaviour, textiles and dress in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries’, Textile History 22 (1991), 297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
34 N. Harte, B., ‘The economics of clothing in the late seventeenth century’, Textile History 22 (1991), 277–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. P. Earle, The making of the English middle class: business, society and family life in London, 1660–1730 (London, 1989), 285–90; Styles, Dress of the people, 218–20.
35 A. L. Beier, ‘Engine of manufacture: the trades of London’, in A. L. Beier and R. Finlay eds., London 1500–1700: the making of the metropolis (London, 1986), 147–8; M. Spufford, The great reclothing of rural England: petty chapmen and their wares in the seventeenth century (London, 1984), 16–17, 88–105, 118–46; Spufford, M., ‘The cost of apparel in seventeenth-century England, and the accuracy of Gregory King’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, 53 (2000), 677–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lemire, B., ‘Consumerism in preindustrial and early industrial England: the trade in secondhand clothes’, Journal of British Studies 27 (January 1988), 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; B. Lemire, The business of everyday life: gender, practice, and social politics in England, c. 1600–1900 (Manchester, 2005), 18–26, 82–109, 115–6; A. Laurence, Women in England 1500–1750 (London, 1994), 146; C. Walsh, ‘Social meaning and social space in the shopping galleries of early modern London’, in J. Benson and J. Ugolini eds., A nation of shopkeepers: five centuries of British retailing (London, 2003), 52–79; J. F. Merritt, The social world of early modern Westminster: Abbey, court and community 1525–1640 (Manchester, 2005), 154–9; Ribiero, Fashion and fiction, 34–6, 122–3, 254–5, 313–5; Styles, Dress of the people, 166–78.
36 T. B. (Thomas Brewer), The bloudy mother, or the most inhumane murthers, committed by Iane Hattersley vpon diuers infants, the issue of her owne bodie & the priuate burying of them in an orchard with her araignment and execution (1610), sig. Bv.
37 GL MS 33011/3, fo. 324r.
38 GL MS 33011/4, fo. 71v.
39 GL MS 9189/1, fo. 116v.
40 Lemire, B., ‘The theft of clothes and popular consumerism in early modern England’, Journal of Social History 24 (1990), 255–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; B. Capp, When gossips meet: women, family and neighbourhood in early modern England (Oxford, 2003), 66–7.
41 G. Walker, ‘Women, theft and the world of stolen goods’, in J. Kermode and G. Walker eds., Women, crime and the courts in early modern England (London, 1994), 87–93; G. Walker, Crime, gender and social order in early modern England (Cambridge, 2003), 162–7.
42 C. Schen, ‘Strategies of poor aged women and widows in sixteenth-century London’, in P. Thane and L. Botelho eds., Women and ageing in British society since 1500 (Harlow, 2001), 15, 23; I. W. Archer, , ‘The charity of early modern Londoners’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 6th series, 12 (2002), 235CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; S. Sweetinburgh, ‘Clothing the naked in late medieval east Kent’; J. Crawford, ‘Clothing distributions and social relations c.1350–1500’; Salter, ‘Reworked material’, in C. Richardson ed., Clothing culture, 1350–1650 (Aldershot, 2004), 109–21, 153–64, 179–91; Hindle, S., ‘Dependency, shame, and belonging: badging the deserving poor, c.1550–1750’, Cultural and Social History 1 (2004), 6–35Google Scholar; P. Griffiths, Lost Londons: change, crime and control in the capital city, 1550–1660 (Cambridge, 2008), 260.
43 J. C. Jeaffreson ed., Middlesex county records (London, 1886–92), 4 volumes: iii, 69–70.
44 GL MS 877/1, fo. 185.
45 H. Woolley, The compleat servant-maid; or the young maidens tutor (1677), 2; Woolley, The gentlewoman's companion, 55.
46 Three bloodie murders (1613), Sig. Cr-v.
47 GL MS 33011/4, fo. 8r; Styles, Dress of the people, 290, 397 (n. 38).
48 GL MS 33011/3, fo. 396r.
49 GL MS 33011/4, fo. 8r.
50 Diary of Samuel Pepys, iv, 282; vi, 51; vii, 299, 329; viii, 212.
51 T. Meldrum, Domestic service and gender 1660–1750: life and work in the London household (London, 2000), 199–204; Capp, When gossips meet, 137–8; Styles, Dress of the people, 249.
52 M. K. McIntosh, Working women in English society, 1300–1620 (Cambridge, 2005), 24–5.
53 Gowing, Domestic dangers, 192.
54 LMA MS DL/C/231, fos. 159v, 161v.
55 Shepard, A., ‘Poverty, labour and the language of social description in early modern England’, Past and Present 201 (November 2008), 61–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
56 OBP, 6 September 1682 (t16820906-2).
57 Capp, When gossips meet, 151.
58 Diary of Samuel Pepys, vi, 238.
59 Meldrum, Domestic service and gender, 55–6.
60 M. Ingram, Church courts, sex and marriage in England, 1570–1640 (Cambridge, 1987), 196–9, 267–8, 274; Gowing, Domestic dangers, 159–64; D. Cressy, Birth, marriage, and death: ritual, religion, and the life-cycle in Tudor and Stuart England (Oxford, 1997), 263–6; D. O'Hara, Courtship and constraint: rethinking the making of marriage in Tudor England (Manchester, 2000), 57–98.
61 C. Richardson, ‘“Havying nothing upon hym saving onely his sherte”: event, narrative and material culture in early modern England’, in C. Richardson ed., Clothing culture, 1350–1650 (Aldershot, 2004), 216–7.
62 GL MS 9057/1, fo. 113r.
63 Ribiero, Fashion and fiction, 134.
64 GL MS 33011/5, fo. 3r.
65 LMA MS DL/C/235, fo. 279v.
66 Morrison, An itinerary, III, iii, 3, 179; Hayward, M., ‘Reflections on gender and status distinctions: an analysis of the liturgical textiles recorded in mid-sixteenth-century London’, Gender and History 14, 3 (2002), 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mendelson and Crawford, Women in early modern England, 131.
67 Richardson, ‘Havying nothing upon hym’, 217–8.
68 A. MacFarlane ed., The Diary of Ralph Josselin 1616–1683 (Oxford, 1991), 410. When his own daughter, Jane, married on 30 August 1670, Josselin provided £10 for ‘her clothes and wedding’, 555.
69 Diary of Samuel Pepys, viii, 141–2.
70 L. C. Orlin, Locating privacy in Tudor London (Oxford, 2007), 35–6.
71 Capp, When gossips meet, 75.
72 GL MS 9057/1, fo. 175r.
73 A mad crue; or, that shall be tryde (1625).
74 Diary of Samuel Pepys, vii, 258–9.
75 Diary of Samuel Pepys, iii, 298; iv, 10, 400; iii, 77; iv, 181; ix, 134; vii, 236–7.
76 Ibid., i, 224–25; iii, 65; v, 84, 110; vi, 48, 53, 55; ix, 406, 427, 453.
77 Ibid., iii, 85, 99, 125; ii, 235; iii, 110; vii, 379; viii, 124, 211.
78 H. Peacham, Worth of a penny: or, a caution to keep money (1677), 27; Morrison, An itinerary, III, iii, 3, 179.
79 A. Jones, McShane, ‘Revealing Mary’, History Today March (March 2004), 44Google Scholar; Vincent, Clothing the elite, 34–6.
80 A. Denny-Brown, ‘Rips and slits: the torn garment and the medieval self’, in C. Richardson ed., Clothing culture, 1350–1650 (Aldershot, 2004), 223–7; R. Sarti, Europe at home: family and material culture 1500–1800 (New Haven and London, 2002), 197–8.
81 Diary of Samuel Pepys, viii, 227.
82 Gowing, Domestic dangers, 104; L. Gowing, Common bodies: women, touch and power in seventeenth-century England (New Haven and London, 2003), 58; Walker, Crime, gender and social order, 98.
83 Gowing, Domestic dangers, 203; Walker, Crime, gender and social order, 58–9; Richardson, ‘Havying nothing upon hym’, 218–21. Cf. Ribiero, Fashion and fiction, 42, 52 who suggests that the disordered garments of men signified mental instability or melancholy.
84 GL MS 9057/1, fo. 184v.
85 GL MS 33011/3, fos. 9r, 208r.
86 GL MS 33011/4, fo. 23r.
87 GL MS 9057/1, fos. 107v–8r, 121r-v.
88 Gowing, Common bodies, 34; Walker, Crime, gender and social order, 54; Ribiero, Fashion and fiction, 132, 160.
89 GL MS 33011/3, fo. 76r.
90 LMA MS DL/C/231, fo. 211r.
91 Hic mulier: or, the man-woman: being a medicine to cure the coltish disease of the staggers in the masculine-feminine of our times (1620), sig. A3v ff. Cf. Haigh, C., ‘Slander and the church courts in the sixteenth century’, Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society 78 (1975), 3Google Scholar for a woman being considered a whore due to ‘the high wearing of her cap’.
92 Diary of Samuel Pepys, i, 323; viii, 193.