Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:38:36.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Engaging Power of English-Language Promotion in Franco's Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2015

ÓSCAR J. MARTÍN GARCÍA  and
FRANCISCO J. RODRÍGUEZ JIMÉNEZ
ÓSCAR J. MARTÍN GARCÍA
Affiliation:
COFUND Marie Curie Junior Fellow, Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies (AIAS), Aarhus University, Denmark; [email protected]
FRANCISCO J. RODRÍGUEZ JIMÉNEZ
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Researcher at University of Salamanca and Fellow of the Real Colegio Complutense, Harvard University; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The United States' support for the Franco dictatorship, along with British dominion over Gibraltar, caused an increasing sense of frustration towards the United States and United Kingdom amongst broad sectors of the Spanish public during the 1960s and 1970s. Growing resentment towards the Anglo-American presence in Spain threatened to jeopardise the geopolitical objectives of these two governments given the strategic importance of the Iberian Peninsula in the Cold War. Both the Americans and the British identified the promotion of the English language as a cultural tool to develop empathy amongst those Spaniards who would drive forward the eventual transition to a post-Franco era. This ‘soft power’ strategy fit perfectly with the pro-modernisation efforts taking place in several parts of the world. English teaching did not serve as a magic potion, however. Cultural seduction was not a cure-all to right the wrongs inflicted by the Anglo-American geostrategic priorities. This article explores the benefits and limitations of English language promotion in Franco's Spain and reflects on the ability of ‘soft power’ to influence what was a rather hostile hard-power context.

Type
Articles
Information
Contemporary European History , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , August 2015 , pp. 415 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of the President's Task Force on International Relations, Nov. 1965, box 39, Papers of David Bell, Series 3, 4, JFK Presidential Library (JFKL). See also: Teaching English Abroad, 22 Oct. 1963, box 121, Record Group 306, Subject folders 1955–1971, US National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Washington DC.

2 US-UK Talks: Alden Memo on English Language Teaching, 17 Jul. 1963, NARA, RG 306, Subject folders 1955–1971, Box 5; USIA Role in the Teaching of English in Foreign Countries, 6 Mar. 1961, NARA, RG 306, Subject folders, box 118. British quotations in Donaldson, Frances, The British Council. The First Fifty Years, (London: Jonathan Cape, 1984)Google Scholar, 7 and White, Arthur, The British Council. The First 25 years, 1934–1959 (London, BC: 1965), 10Google Scholar.

3 Fensworth, Lawrence, ‘Spain in Western Defense’, Foreign Affairs, 31 (1953), 648–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 In the literature about the international context affecting Spanish transition to democracy more attention has been paid to the geopolitics and economic factors, with the cultural sphere being largely neglected. See González, Damián, ‘Actores y factores internacionales en el cambio político español. Una mirada a la historiografía’, in Martín, Óscar and Ortiz, Manuel, (eds.), Claves internacionales en la transición española, (Madrid: La Catarata, 2010), 39–65Google Scholar.

5 Di Nolfo, Ennio, ‘The Cold War and the transformation of the Mediterranean, 1960–1975’, in Leffler, Melyn and Westad, Odd Arne eds., The Cambridge History of the Cold War. Crisis and Détente (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 238CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Frankel, Charles, The Neglected Aspect of Foreign Affairs, (Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1966), 100Google Scholar.

7 The purportedly generous aspect of cultural diplomacy was inevitably tainted by the geostrategic imperatives of the Cold War. See Lebovic, Sam, ‘The World War II Origins of the Fulbright Program and the Foundations of American Cultural Globalism’, Diplomatic History, 37, 2 (2013), 280–312Google Scholar.

8 Zimmerman, Jonathan, Innocents abroad: American teachers in the American century, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006) pp. 181–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar and 199–206.

9 Osgood, Kenneth, Total Cold War: Eisenhower's Secret Propaganda Battle at Home and Abroad, (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006)Google Scholar.

10 We are especially interested in Joseph Nye's conception of international influence based more on cultural enticement than on military might. This article revolves around the concept of ‘soft power’, a term coined by Nye in allusion to those intangible means of power that do not stem from mere coercion but rather result from the state's ability to attract foreign audiences by disseminating its cultural achievements and its institutions abroad. See Nye, Joseph, Soft Power (New York: Public Affairs, 2004), 107–9Google Scholar. An illuminating debate on the concept of public diplomacy and soft power can be found in Cull, Nicholas: ‘Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 616 (2008), 31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Shaw, Tony, ‘The Politics of Cold War Culture’, Journal of Cold War Studies, 3/3 (2001), 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Scott-Smith, Giles and Krabbendam, Hans, eds., The Cultural Cold War in Western Europe, 1945–1960 (London, Frank Cass Publishers, 2003)Google Scholar; Caute, David, The Dancer Defects: The Struggle for Cultural Supremacy during the Cold War, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Gienow-Hecht, Jessica and Schumacher, Frank, Culture and International History, (Oxford: Berghahn books, 2004)Google Scholar; Wagnleitner, Reinhold, ed., Satchmo meets Amadeus: Transatlantica, Vol. 2 (Transatlantica), (Gebundene Ausgabe: Hardcover, 2006)Google Scholar; Gieienow, Jessica and Donfried, Mark, eds., Searching for a Cultural Diplomacy (New York: Berghahn Books, 2010)Google Scholar.

13 Arndt, Richard, The First Resort of Kings. American Cultural Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century (New York: Potomac Books, 2005), 1–10Google Scholar and 187–94; Wagnleitner, Richard, Coca-Colonization and the Cold War: the Cultural Mission of the United States in Austria After the Second World War, (London: UNCP, 1994), 98–101Google Scholar; Pells, Richard, Not Like US. How Europeans have loved, hated and transformed American Culture since World War II, (New York: Basic Books, 1997), 270–3Google Scholar. For more on the situation with other languages see Delgado, Lorenzo, ‘La acción cultural exterior de España: trayectoria reciente y retos pendientes’, in Marco, Elvira and Otero, Jaime, eds., El discreto encanto de la cultura, (Barcelona: Ariel, 2012), 15–36Google Scholar; de Raymond, Jean-François, L'action culturelle extérieure de la France, (Paris: La Documentation Française, 2000)Google Scholar; Luconi, Stefano, La “Diplomazia Parallela”. Il regime fascista e la mobilita-zione politica degli italo-americani, (Milano: Angeli, 2000)Google Scholar. More recently, China's efforts to promote its language and culture have increased in extraordinary fashion. See Hongyi, Lai and Yiyi, Lu, eds., China Soft Power and International Relations, (London: Routledge, 2012)Google Scholar. Other works have analysed the promotion of the language abroad only tangentially. See, for example, Kelts, Ronald, Japanamerica: how Japanese pop culture has invaded the U.S. (Nueva York, 2006)Google Scholar; Zhuk, Sergei, Rock and Roll in the Rocket City: The West, Identity, and Ideology in Soviet Dniepropetrovsk, 1960–1985 (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

14 Portugal was not considered a fascist dictatorship by the Allies and was one of NATO's founding members in 1949. Numerous works have been written on the post-war international isolation of Franco's Spain. See, for instance, Portero, Florentino, Franco aislado: La cuestión española 1945–1950 (Madrid: Aguilar, 1989)Google Scholar or Edwards, Jill, Anglo-American Relations and the Franco Question, 1945–1955 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Pardo, Rosa, “La política norteamericana”, Ayer, 49 (2003), 36–7Google Scholar.

16 Spanish-American political relations during the 60s and 70s in Viñas, Ángel, En las garras del águila (Barcelona: Crítica, 2003)Google Scholar; Delgado, Lorenzo, ‘¿El amigo americano? España y Estados Unidos durante el franquismo’, Studia Historica, 21(2003), 231–76Google Scholar; Powell, Charles, El amigo americano. España y Estados Unidos: de la dictadura a la democracia (Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg, 2011)Google Scholar, Lemus, Encarnación, Estados Unidos y la Transición española. Entre la Revolución de los Claveles y la Marcha Verde (Madrid: Sílex, 2011)Google Scholar.

17 Inspection Report USIS-Spain, 27 Apr. 1959, NARA, RG 306, Box 8.

18 García, Óscar Martín, ‘A Complicated Mission. The United States and Spanish Students during the Johnson Administration’, Cold War History, 13 (2012 /3), 311–29Google Scholar.

19 Operations Plan for Spain, 6 Nov. 1959, NARA, RG 59, Bureau of European Affairs, Spain 1956–66, Box 5; Inspection Report USIS-Spain, 29 May 1959, NARA, RG 306, Inspection Reports and Related Records 1954–62, box 8.

20 The Succession Problem in Spain, 17 July 1963, box. 16, RG 59, Subject Files, 1963–73.

21 Simpson, B., Economists with Guns. Authoritarian Development and US-Indonesian Relations, 1960–1968, (Stanford, 2008), 95–106Google Scholar; Field, T., ‘Ideology as Strategy: Military-Led Modernization and the Origins of the Alliance for Progress in Bolivia’, Diplomatic History, 36 (2012/1): 152–5.Google Scholar

22 The ‘secular utopia’ of modernisation was also promoted by the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CFC). This intellectual institution represented one of the cornerstones of the Cultural Cold War waged in western Europe. The involvement of the CIA in CFC is discussed in Saunders, Frances, Who Paid the Piper: The CIA and the Cultural Cold War, (London, Granta Books, 2000Google Scholar) and Scott-Smith, Giles, The Politics of Apolitical culture (London, Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar. On the Spanish case and the role of the CFC in the international rehabilitation of the Franco regime, see Glondys, Olga, La Guerra fría cultural y el exilio republican español. Cuadernos del Congreso por la Libertad de la CUltura (1953–1965) (Madrid: CSIC, 2012).Google Scholar

23 Shah, Heman, Production of Modernization: Daniel Lerner, Mass Media, and the Passing of Traditional Society (Philadelphia: TUP, 2011), 29–30.Google Scholar

24 English Language Teaching as an Important Tool of Foreign Policy, 23 Sept. 1963, NARA, RG 306, Subject folders 1955–1971, box 121.

25 Héctor Lindo-Fuentes, Diálogos: Modernizing Minds in El Salvador: Education Reform and the Cold War, 1960–1980 (Albuquerque, UN M, 2012), 174.

26 Buchanan, Tom, Britain and the Spanish Civil War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar, 1; and by the same author, ‘Receding Triumph: British Opposition to the Franco Regime, 1945–59’, Twentieth Century British History 12 (2001), 163–84.

27 Information Policy Report, 27 Feb. 1969, NA, FCO 26/256; Spain: Inspector's Report, 22 Sept. 1969, NA, FCO 26/255 and Annual Report of the British Council in Spain (1967/1968), 22 May 1968, NA, BC 56/30.

28 On Spanish-British relations during these decades see Carolina Labarta, ‘Las relaciones hispano-británicas bajo el franquismo, 1950–1973’, Studia Histórica, Historia Contemporánea, 22 (Salamanca, 2004). Also see García, Óscar Martín, ‘Gran Bretaña y España. Relaciones y estrategias para el fin de una dictadura, 1969–1977’ in Martín, Óscar and Manuel, Ortiz, Claves internacionales en la transición española (Madrid: La Catarata, 2010).Google Scholar

29 Representative's Annual Report (1959–1960), NA, FCO 924/1342.

30 Anglo-Spanish Contacts, 1966–1970, 8 Oct. 1970. NA, FCO 13/379; Spain: Inspector's Report, 22 Sept. 1969, NA, FCO 26/255 and Annual Report of the British Council in Spain (1967/1968), 22 May 1968, NA, BC 56/30.

31 de la Torre, Joseba, ‘España como Mercado: oportunidades de negocio, desarrollo económico y franquismo,” Hispania, 237 (2011), 181–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Puig, Nuria and Álvaro, Adoración, ‘International Aid and National Entrepreneurship: A comparative Analysis of Pro-American Business Networks in Southern Europe, 1950–1975’, Business and Economic History Online, 1 (2003), 1–31Google Scholar.

33 Area Program Memorandum, 5 Sept. 1968. LBJ. Area Program Memorandum, West Europe, 1968.

34 Quoted in Wieck, Randolph, Ignorance Abroad. American Educational and Cultural Foreign Policy and the Office of Assistant Secretary of State (London, Praeger, 1992), 65Google Scholar.

35 R. Cecil to G. West, 6 Feb. 1967, NA, BC 56/25; Some General Observations on United States Policy Towards Spain, 25 Jun. 1965, NARA, RG. 59. Bureau of European Affairs, Spain, 1956–1966, box 2.

36 Rosendorf, Neal Moses, ‘Be El Caudillo's Guest: The Franco Regime's Quest for Rehabilitation and Dollars after World War II via the Promotion of U.S. Tourism to Spain’, Diplomatic History, 30, (2006/3): 372–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also see Appadurai, Arjun, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis, 1996)Google Scholar. The inspiring work of Óscar Calvo on the US aid programmes also contributes to a better understanding of how peripheral nations were able to influence their American ally. Óscar Calvo González, ‘Neither a Carrot Nor a Stick: American Foreign Aid and Economic Policymaking in Spain during the 1950s’, Diplomatic History, 30 (2006/3), 437. Similar examples can be found in Karabell, Z., Architects of Intervention: The United States, the Third World, and the Cold War, 1946–1962 (Baton Rouge, LA, 1999).Google Scholar

37 For the tendency in studies of international relations to view developing states in this way, see Gaddis, J. L., ‘On Starting All Over Again: A Naïve Approach to the Study of the Cold War’, in Westad, O. A., ed., Reviewing the Cold War: Approaches, Interpretations, Theory (London, 2000)Google Scholar, 31. See also: Some General Observations on United States Policy Towards Spain, 25 Jun. 1965, NARA, RG. 59. Bureau of European Affairs, Spain, 1956–1966, box 2.

38 Manuel Vázquez Montalbán, La penetración norteamericana en España (Madrid: Cuadernos para el Diàlogo, 1973).

39 Sanz, Luis, Estado, Ciencia y tecnología en España: 1939–1997 (Madrid: Alianza, 1997)Google Scholar, 133 and La enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras en España (Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, 2000), 52.

40 Rodríguez, Francisco J., ¿Antídoto contra el antiamericanismo? American Studies en España, 1945–69 (Valencia: PUV, 2010).Google Scholar

41 Survey of CU's English Language Programs, June 1963, NARA, RG 306, Subject folders 1955–1971, Box 121.

42 English Language Teaching as an Important Tool of Foreign Policy, 23 Sept. 1963, NARA, RG 306, Subject folders 1955–1971, box 121. The concepts of ‘prime movers’ and ‘multiplier effect’ are discussed in Delgado, Lorenzo, ‘La maquinaria de persuasión’, Ayer, 75, 3 (2009)Google Scholar, 97–132 and Scott-Smith, Giles, Networks of Empire. The US State Department's Foreign Leader Program in the Netherlands, France and Britain, 1950–70 (Brussels: Peter Lang, 2008) 31–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Teaching English Abroad, 22 Oct. 1963, box 121, Record Group 306, Subject folders 1955–1971, US National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Washington DC.; Coombs, Philip, The Fourth Dimension of Foreign Policy: Education and Cultural Affairs (New York, 1964), 63.Google Scholar

44 Cultural Convention between the Government of the United Kingdom and the Government of Spain, NA, FCO 924/1314.

45 Spain: Inspector's Report, 22 Sept. 1969, NA, FCO 26/255. More information on the British Council in Lee, John, ‘British cultural diplomacy and the cold war: 1946–61’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, 1 (1998), 112–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Aldrich, Richard, ‘Putting the Culture into the Cold War: The Cultural Relations Department (CRD) and British Covert Information Warfare’, Intelligence and National Security, 18, 2 (2003), 109–33Google Scholar.

46 J. Bruton to Overseas Division, 03 Jan. 1969, NA, BC 56/25; Representative's Annual Report (1971–1972), 8 May 1972. NA, FCO, 13/568; Triennial Report on British Community in Spain, 8 Feb. 1971, NA, FCO 47/531; Hand Over Notes, 28 July 1972, NA, BC 56/34.

47 The Coordination of US Government English Language Teaching Activities, 19 Jul. 1963. RG 306, Subject folders 1955–1971, Box 121. More details about the US government's and the American civil society's cooperation in this realm are available in Scott Lucas ‘Negotiating Freedom’, in Laville, Helen and Wilford, Hugh, eds., The US Government, Citizen Groups and the Cold War, (London, 2006), 3–13.Google Scholar

48 As for the role of the Ford Foundation on the Cultural Cold War, see Gemmlli, Giuliana and MacLeod, Roy, eds., America Foundations in Europe. Grant-Giving Policies, Cultural Diplomacy and Trans-Atlantic Relations, 1929–80 (Brussels, 2003)Google Scholar and Berghahn, Volker, America and the Intellectual Cold Wars in Europe, (Princeton, 2001)Google Scholar. On the subject of this English teaching program see The English Program in Spanish Universities by Robert Lado, June 1966, FFA, R-4574/62–42; Ford Foundation Program for English Teaching in Spain, 31 May 1973. FFA, R.1083/66–48; Cursillo sobre la Metodología de la Enseñanza del Inglés en Barcelona, 9 Nov. 1967. FFA, R.1083, Box 66–48.

49 The BBC led the spread of English through the airwaves. In the early 1960s it released around 140 lessons a week in western Europe. See, for example, A Case for External Broadcasting, 16 Feb. NA, FCO 26/1535.

50 Noticias de Actualidad, Feb. 1963, 1.

51 Ibid.

52 More information about several attacks against the British Council across the world in Fisher, Ali, A Story of Engagement: the British Council 1934–2009 (London, 2009), 20–48Google Scholar.

53 British Institute School, Madrid, 4 July 1974, NA, BC 56/36; Handing Over Notes, Representative Spain, 30 Sept. 1976, NA, BC, 56/34.

54 Representative's Annual Report (1971–1972), 20 Sept 1972, NA, FCO 13/568, Representative's Annual Report (1972/1973), Apr. 1973, NA, FCO 13/680.

55 Handing Over Notes, 30 Sept. 1976. NA., BC 56/34; Annual report 1975/76. The British Council, Spain, 30 Apr. 1976. NA, FCO 13/821.

56 US Policy Assessment. 30 June 1967. NARA, RG59, CFP, 1967–1969, Political and Defense, Box 2493; Report of the President's Task Force on International Relations, November 1965. JFK Library, Papers of David Bell, Series 3.4, Presidential Commissions, Committees and Task Forces 1964–1977, box 39. See likewise León, Pablo, ‘Los canales de la propaganda norteamericana en España, 1945–1960’, Ayer 75, 3 (2009), 133–58.Google Scholar

57 Fernández, J. Manuel, ‘Influencias nacionales europeas en la política educativa española’, Historia de la educación, 24 (2005), 31–2.Google Scholar

58 US Policy Assessment, 8 Oct. 1969 and Annual US Policy Assessment, 21 Nov. 1970, NARA, RG 59, CFPF 1967–69, Spain, Box 2493.

59 Annual Review of Spain, 1970, 4 Feb. 1971. NA, FCO 9/1451; Internal situation of Spain, 5 Jan. 1974. NA, FCO 9/2085.

60 The American support for the creation of the CENIDE and the ICE in Delgado, Lorenzo, ‘After Franco, What? La diplomacia pública de Estados Unidos y la preparación del post-franquismo’, in Martín, Óscar and Ortiz, Manuel, eds., Claves internacionales, 102–6.Google Scholar

61 Representative's Annual Report (1971–1972), Apr. 1972, NA, FCO 13/568; British Council Visitors, 01 Mar. 1976. NA, FCO 13/821.

62 ACFE, Annual Report 15 Oct. 1972, AGA, Box 54/10570; ACFE. Annual Program Proposal, 11 Feb. 1969, AGA, Box 54/10519; External Cultural and Information activities of major European countries in 1962, 14 Mar. 1963, NARA, RG 306, Research Memorandums, 1963–82, Box 1; Conversation with Manuel Conejero, 15 June 1975, Library of Congress, American Studies Association (ASA), Part I: Administrative File, 1946–2003, Box I: 101; Francisco J. Rodríguez, ¿Antídoto contra el antiamericanismo? American Studies en España, 1945–69, 243.

63 English Language Teaching as an Important Tool of Foreign Policy, 23 Sept. 1963, NARA, RG 306, Subject folders 1955–1971, box 121.

64 Commission for Educational Exchange between the United States of America and Spain, Annual Program Proposal, 12 Mar. 1963, AGA, Box 54/10519; Commission for Educational Exchange between the United States of America and Spain, Annual Program Proposal, 12 June 1965, AGA, Box 54/10519 and Ford Foundation Program for English Teaching in Spain, 31 May 1973, FFA, R. 1083/66–48.

65 Representative's Annual Report (1971–1972), 8 May 1972, NA. FCO 13/568.

66 García, Joaquín, ‘Los servicios de innovación en los Institutos de Ciencias de la Educación’, Studia Paedagógica, 9 (1982), 67.Google Scholar

67 Ali Fisher offered an interesting reflection on the effectiveness of cultural diplomacy: ‘while much emphasis is currently placed on measurement and concrete outcomes, the reality is that public diplomacy can offer no more than influence, to change the odds of particular outcomes occurring’. See Collaborative Public Diplomacy (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013), ix.

68 Country Assessment Report, 16 Feb. 1961, NARA, RG 59, B.C.A-Country Files, 1955–64, box 215; Country Assessment Report, 31 Jan. 1964, NARA, RG 59, B.C.A-Country Files, 1955–64, box 215; Commission for Educational Exchange between the United States of America and Spain, Annual Program Proposal, 4 July 1971, AGA, 54/10519; The United States Communicates with the World, 25 Aug. 1975, NARA RG 306, Post Publications, 1953–99, box 65; Representative's Annual Report (1971–1972), 20 Sept. 1972, NA, FCO 13/568; Representative's Annual Report (1972/1973), Apr. 1973, NA, BC 13/680.

69 Ford Foundation Program for English Teaching in Spain, 31 May 1973, FFA, R.1083/66–48.

70 Fernández, María E. and Suso, Javier, La enseñanza del francés en España (1767–1936), Estudio histórico: objetivos, contenidos, procedimientos (Granada: Método, 1999)Google Scholar; Morales, Francisco J.: ‘La modernidad en la enseñanza del francés en España’, in Bonnet, Dominique, Chaves, María and Duchêne, Nadia, eds., Littérature, langages et arts: rencontres et création (Universidad de Huelva, 2007)Google Scholar. Apart from these works, to our knowledge the case of France has yet to be examined from the same perspective and methodology used in this article.

71 La enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras en España (Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, 2000), 31.

72 First Impressions: A Country Poised, 4 Apr. 1977, NA, FCO 2641; Powell, Charles, ‘España en Europa: de 1945 a nuestros días’, Ayer, 49 (2003), 110Google Scholar; William Chislett, ‘El antiamericanismo en España: el peso de la historia’, Instituto Elcano, working paper 47 (2005), 1.

73 Nye, Joseph, ‘Public Diplomacy and Soft Power’, in Cull, Nicholas and Cowan, Geoffrey, eds., Public Diplomacy in a Changing World, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences (2008)Google Scholar, 102; see also Nye, Soft Power (New York, 2004), 107–9.