Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:29:15.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Endoscopy and cohomology growth on $\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}U(3)$

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2014

Simon Marshall*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Northwestern University, 2033 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA email [email protected]

Abstract

We apply the endoscopic classification of automorphic forms on $U(3)$ to study the growth of the first Betti number of congruence covers of a Picard modular surface. As a consequence, we establish a case of a conjecture of Sarnak and Xue on cohomology growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Artin, E., The orders of the classical simple groups, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 8 (1955), 455472.Google Scholar
Bergeron, N., Millson, J. and Moeglin, C., The Hodge conjecture and arithmetic quotients of complex balls, Preprint (2013), arXiv:1306.1515.Google Scholar
Borel, A. and Wallach, N., Continuous cohomology, discrete subgroups, and representations of reductive groups, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol 67 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000).Google Scholar
Chan, P.-S. and Flicker, Y., Cyclic odd degree base change lifting for unitary groups in three variables, Int. J. Number Theory 5 (2009), 12471309.Google Scholar
Cossutta, M. and Marshall, S., Theta lifting and cohomology growth in p-adic towers, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2012), doi:10.1093/imrn/rns139.Google Scholar
Ferrari, A., Théorème de l’indice et formule des traces, Manuscripta Math. 124 (2007), 363390.Google Scholar
Flicker, Y., Characters, genericity, and multiplicity one for U(3), J. Anal. Math. 94 (2004), 115.Google Scholar
Flicker, Y., Automorphic representations of low rank groups (World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2006).Google Scholar
Gelbart, S. and Rogawski, J., L-functions and Fourier–Jacobi coefficients for the unitary group U(3), Invent. Math. 105 (1991), 445472.Google Scholar
Landherr, W., Äquivalenze Hermitscher Formen über einem beliebigen algebraischen Zahlkörper, Abh. Math. Sem. in Univ. Hambg. 11 (1936), 245248.Google Scholar
Mok, C. P., Endoscopic classification of representations of quasi-split unitary groups, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear, arXiv:1206.0882v5.Google Scholar
Prasad, G. and Yeung, S.-K., Fake projective planes, Invent. Math. 168 (2007), 321370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogawski, J., Automorphic representations of unitary groups in three variables, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 123 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1990).Google Scholar
Rogawski, J., The multiplicity formula for A-packets, in The zeta functions of Picard modular surfaces (Université de Montréal, QC, 1992), 395419.Google Scholar
Sarnak, P. and Xue, X., Bounds for multiplicities of automorphic representations, Duke Math. J. 64 (1991), 207227.Google Scholar