Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:57:13.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinship Structure and Political Authority: The Middle East and Central Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Charles Lindholm
Charles Lindholm
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kinship studies have traditionally been the core of the anthropological enterprise, but the knowledge gained in studies of indigenous kinship systems has not generally been of interest to other disciplines. This essay intends to draw attention to some of the political and social implications of patterns of kinship relations by comparing two large historical culture areas, that of the frontier region of Inner Asia, and that of the peripheral tribes of the Middle East.

Type
The Ties that Bind
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 334 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aberle, D. 1953. The Kinship System of the Kalmuk Mongols. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Abrahamian, E. 1975. “European Feudalism and Middle Eastern Depotism”. Science and Society, 12:2, 129–56.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. 1979. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Antoun, R. 1967. “Social Organization and the Life Cycle in an Arab Village”. Ethnology, 6:3, 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayalon, D. 1975. “Preliminary Remarks on the Mamluk Military Institution in Islam,” in War Technology, and Society in the Middle East, V. Parry and M. Yapp, eds. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacon, E. 1954. “Types of Pastoral Nomadism in Central and Southwest Asia”. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 10:144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, E 1958. Obok. New York: Wenner-Gren.Google Scholar
Barfield, T. 1982. “The Hsiung-nu Imperial Confederacy: Organization and Foreign Policy”. Journal of Asian Studies, 41:1, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, F. 1954. “Father's Brother's Daughter Marriage in Kurdistan”. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 10:2164–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, F 1959. “Segmentary Opposition and the Theory of Games”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 89:1, 5–21.Google Scholar
Barth, F 1961. Nomads of South Persia. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Barth, F 1965. Political Leadership among the Swat Pathans. London: Athalone.Google Scholar
Black, J. 1972. “Tyranny as a Strategy for Survival in 'Egalitarian' Society”. Man, 7:4, 614–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, C. 1975. “Recruitment, Muster, and Review in Medieval Islamic Armies,” in War Technology, and Society in the Middle East, V. Parry and M. Yapp, eds. LondonOxfordUniversityPress.Google Scholar
Burnham, P. 1979. “Spatial Mobility and Political Centralization in Pastoral So cieties,”in Pastoral Production and Society, L'équipe écologic et anthropologic des sociétés pastorales, eds. New York: CambridgeUniversityPress.Google Scholar
Chelod, J. 1965. “La mariage avec la cousine parallele dans le systeme arabe”. L'homme, 5:3–4, 113–73.Google Scholar
Cheney, G. 1979. The Pre-Revolutionary Culture of Outer Mongolia. Bloomington: Mongolia Society.Google Scholar
Cleaves, F. 1983. The Secret History of the Mongols. Cambridge: HarvardUniversityPress.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. 1983. “Ten Section Systems, Omaha Kinship, and Dispersed Alliance among the Ancient Chinese”. Current Anthropology, 24:3, 327–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crone, P. 1980. Slaves on Horses. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuisenier, J. 1962. “Endogamie et exogamie dans le manage arabe”. L'homme, 2:2, 80–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuisenier, J 1964. “Materiaux et hypotheses pour une etude des structures de la parente en Turquie”. L'homme, 4:1, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuisenier, J 1975. Economie et parente. Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuisenier, J., and Miguel, A. 1965. “La terminologie arabe de la parenté analyse semantique et analyse componentielle”. L'homme 5:1, 17–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. 1977. People of the Mediterranean. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Denham, W.; McDaniel, C.; and Atkins, J. 1979. “Aranda and Alyawara Kinship: A Quantitative Argument for a Double Helix Model”. American Ethnologist, 6:1, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eickelman, D. 1976. Moroccan Islam: Tradition and Society in a Pilgrimage Center. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1949. The Sanusi of Cyrenaica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernea, R. 1970. Shaykh and Effendi. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 1979. System, Structure, and Contradiction in the Evolution of Asiatic Social Systems. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1979. “Suq-the Bazaar Economy in Sefrou,” in Meaning and Order in Moroccan Society, Geertz, C., Geertz, H., and Rosen, L., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1969. Saints of the Atlas. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Gellner, E 1981. “Flux and Reflux in the Faith of Men”. in Muslim Society, Gellner, E., ed. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibb, H., and Bowen, H. 1963. Islamic Society and the West, vol. I, pt. 1. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilsenan, M. 1976. “Lying, Honor, and Contradiction,” in Transaction and Meaning, Kapferer, B., ed. Philadelphia: lshi.Google Scholar
Harmatta, J. 1952. “The Dissolution of the Hun Empire”. Acta Archaeologica, 2:4, 277–304.Google Scholar
Héritier, F. 1981. L'exercice de la parenté. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. 1938. Kazak Social Structure. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C. 1979. “The Uses of Genealogy: A Historical Survey of the Nomadic and Sedentarized Buryat,” in Pastoral Production and Society, L'équipe écologic et anthropologic des sociétés pastorales, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ibn, Khaldun. 1967. The Muyaddimah, F. Rosenthal, trans., N. Dawood, abridg. Princeton: Bollingen.Google Scholar
Irons, W. 1979. “Political Stratification among Pastoral Nomads,” in Pastoral Production and Society, L'équipe écologic et anthropologic des sociétés pastorales, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jagchid, S., and Hyer, P. 1979. Mongolia's Culture and Society. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Keyser, J. 1974. “The Middle Eastern Case: Is There a Marriage Rule?” Ethnology, 13:3, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, G. 1958. The Pathans: A Sketch. Peshawar: University Books.Google Scholar
Khazanov, A. 1981. “The Early State among the Eurasian Nomads,” in The Study of the State, Claessen, H. and Skalnik, P., eds. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Khuri, F. 1970. ”Parallel Cousin Marriage Reconsidered”. Man, 5:4, 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krader, L. 1963. The Social Organization of the Mongol-Turkic Pastoral Nomads. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Krader, L 1979. “The Origin of the State among the Nomads of Asia,” in Pastoral Production and Society, L'équipe écologic et anthropologic des sociétés pastorales, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, R., and Lane, B. 1959. “On the Development of Dakota-Iroquois and Crow-Omaha Kinship Terminologies”. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 15:3, 254–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, O. 1940. Inner Asian Frontiers of China. New York: American Geographical Society.Google Scholar
Lattimore, O 1962. Studies in Frontier History: Collected Papers, 1928–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Lindholm, C. 1981. “The Structure of Violence among the Swat Pukhtun”. Ethnology, 20:2, 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindholm, C 1982. Generosity and Jealousy: The Swat Pukhtun of Northern Pakistan. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lindner, R. 1982. “What Was a Nomadic Tribe?” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 24:4, 689–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, E. 1967. Bedouin of the Negev. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Meeker, M. 1979. Literature and Violence in North Arabia. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montaigne, R. 1973. The Berbers: Their Social and Political Organization. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Murphey, R., and Kasdan, L. 1959. “The Structure of Parallel Cousin Marriage”. American Anthropologist, 61:1, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, V., and Yapp, M. 1975. “Introduction,” in War Technology, and Society in the Middle East, Parry, V. and Yapp, M., eds. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patai, R. 1951. “Nomadism: Middle Eastern and Central Asian”. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 7:4, 401–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E. 1967. “Some Structural Aspects of the Feud among the Camel-Herding Bedouin of Cyrenaica”. Africa, 37:3, 263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E 1970. “The Proliferation of Segments in the Lineage of the Bedouin of Cyrenaica,” in Peoples and Cultures of the Middle East, vol. 1, Sweet, L., ed. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Pipes, D. 1981. Slave Soldiers and Islam. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson-Smith, W. 1903. Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Rosen, L. 1979. “Social Identity and Points of Attachment: Approaches to Social Organization,” in Meaning and Order in Moroccan Society, Geertz, C., Geertz, H., and Rosen, L., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, H. 1965. “The Social Composition of the Military in the Process of State Formation in the Arabian Desert”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 95:12, 75–194.Google Scholar
Rubel, P. 1967. The Kalmyk Mongols. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1961. “The Segmentary Lineage System: An Organization of Predatory Expansion”. American Anthropologist, 63:2, 322–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, P. 1974. “Tribal Chiefs as Middlemen”. Anthropological Quarterly, 47:2, 203–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, P I978a. “Does Complementary Opposition Exist?” American Anthropolo gist, 80:1, 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, P 1978b. “Ideology and Change in Middle Eastern Tribal Societies”. Man,13:4, 618–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, P. 1979. “Inequality and Oppression in Nomadic Society,” in Pastoral Produc tion and Society, L'équipe écologic et anthropologic des sociétés pastorales, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szynkiewicz, S. 1978. “Kinship Terminology and Kinship Change among the Mongols,” in Poland and the Tenth ICAES, Frankowska, M., ed. Wroclaw: Polish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Szynkiewicz, S. 1979. “What Is Wrong with Some Restrictive Interpretations of the Crow Omaha Terminology”. Ethnologia Polona, 5:2, 135–49.Google Scholar
Turner, B. 1974. Weber and Islam. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Vignet-Zernz, J. 1979. “A propos des Bedouins,” in Pastoral Production and Society, L'équipe écologie et anthropologic des sociétés pastorales, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vladimirtsov, B. 1948. Le regime social des Mongols. Paris: Musée Guimet.Google Scholar
Vreeland, H. 1962. Mongol Community and Kinship Structure. New Haven: Human Relations Area Files Press.Google Scholar
Waterbury, J. 1972. “Tribalism, Trade, and Politics: The Transformation of the Swasa of Morocco,” in Arabs and Berbers, Gellner, E. and Micaud, R., eds. Lexington, Mass.: Heath.Google Scholar